Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: b p agarwal · Page 1 of about 67 results (0.187 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 12 2004

Smt. Shanti Devi (Since Dead Represented by L.Rs.) and ors. Vs. Ram Na ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-12-2004

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Muslim Law; Jaipur Laws Act, 1923 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27; Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : AIR2004Raj232; 2004(3)WLC85

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Agarwal, Sr. Adv. and; R.P. Agarwal, Adv.

Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. This Special Appeal, preferred by defendant appellants, arises out of the judgment and decree dated November 9, 1984 of the learned single Judge whereby Civil Regular First Appeal of the plaintiff respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1979

Suratram Vs. the Addl. District Development Officer, Ajmer and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-20-1979

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226(1); Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953 - Sections 19; Rajasthan Panchayat Rules - Rule 15

Reported in : AIR1979Raj186

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Agarwal and; K.K. Sharma, Advs.

ORDERG.M. Lodha, J. 1. This writ petition provides a typical example of attempt of an undemocratic Sarpanch to flout majority verdict on the heels of legal technicalities. 2. Before I proceed to give the facts of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 1996

Kamani Engineering Corporation Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-26-1996

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 11 and 173J; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B

Reported in : 2003(159)ELT125(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Agarwal, Adv.

M.P. Singh, J.1. The petitioner has claimed the refund of the excise duty wrongly recovered under Item No. 26-AA(ia) of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 ('the Act No. 1 of 1944')2. The petitioner is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 09 2002

Rajasthan Central Stores (P) Ltd. Vs. Cit

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-09-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)176CTR(Raj)616

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Agarwal, for the Assessee J.K. Singh & Anuroop Singhi, for the Revenue

By the CourtOn an application filed under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following question :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 1977

Gyasi Ram Vs. Ram Chandra Singh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-06-1977

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106, 107 and 111; Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 3 and 3(1); ;Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildigs (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 29A

Reported in : AIR1978All376

Advocate for Appellant : Prakash Gupta, Adv.

M.P. Mehrotra, J.1. This is the defendant's second appeal arising out of a suit for the tenant's eviction filed by the landlord after determining the former's tenancy. The brief facts are these: The plaintiff claimed to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2001

Mahesh Kumar Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-01-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 1, 8, 32, 32(1), 113-B and 114; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 201, 304-B and 498-A

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4417

Advocate for Appellant : Shiv Nath Singh and ;V.S. Singh, Advs.

U.S. Tripathi, J.1. Appellant Mahesh Kumar has preferred this appeal against the Judgment and order dated 8-2-1991 passed by 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Kanpur Dehat in S.T. No. 198 of 1988 convicting the appellant under Sections...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2018

North Delhi Power Limited ( Now Known as Tata Power Delhi Distribution ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-17-2018

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Manish Srivastav, Mr. Ankit Agrawal, Mr. Adib K. Khan

* % + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h July, 2018 EX.S.A. 4/2014 & CM No.9650/2014 (for stay). NORTH DELHI POWER LIMITED ( NOW KNOWN AS TATA POWER...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 28 1983

Hindustan Motors Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on : Dec-28-1983

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1984)(16)ELT647Tri(Kol.)kata

1. Hindustan Motors Ltd., P.O. Hindmotor, Dist. Hooghly, West Bengal has filed an appeal being aggrieved from Order No. 13/WB/83, dated 9th March, 1983 passed by the Collector (Appeals), Calcutta.2. Briefly the facts are that the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 1998

B. Kistaiah Vs. Government of India and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-06-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 12(A and E), 13 and 23; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 120-B, 199, 200, 201, 416, 419, 465 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1908 - Sections 164

Reported in : 1998(5)ALD135; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)466; 1998(4)ALT738

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Ramachandra Rao, ;Mr. E. Seshagiri Rao, Advs. and ;Advocate-General, A.P., Hyd.

ORDERB. Sudershan Reddy, J 1. Both these writ petitions can be disposed of by a common order, as common questions arise for consideration. This is a tell tale story of unscrupulous litigants abusing the judicial process....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1989

Kishan Lal Vs. Shyam Lal Represented by Kedar and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-02-1989

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 2(2), 13, 26 and 27; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47

Reported in : AIR1990Raj46

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Sharma, Adv.

Israni, J.1. This revision petition hasbeen referred by learned single Judge fordecision to larger Bench and has formulatedfollowing two questions:1. Whether a decree for eviction passed prior to the applicability of the provisions of the Rajasthan...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial