Advanced Search Results

Saraswati Mahila Mandal Swa Sahayata Samooh Salaiya Vs. the State of M ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ashok Singh

W.P.No.6379 / 2012 (Saraswati Mahila Mandal ..Vs.State of M.P.& otheRs.09-07-2012 Shri Ashok Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.K.Shrivastava, learned panel lawyer, for the State/respondents. Heard on the question of admission and interim relief. Though...

Ganga Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ashok Singh

Writ Petition No.11235/2013 (Ganga Singh ..Vs..State of M.P.& otheRs.15-07-2013 Heard Shri Ashok Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Rahul Rawat, learned panel lawyer, on the question of admission and interim relief. The learned panel...

Smt. Ranu Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Ho ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ashok Singh

1 W.P.No.8074/2013 7/1/2014. Shri Ashok Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Devashish, learned Panel Lawyer for respondents No.1 to 5. Shri R.B.Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.6. Challenging the order passed by the Commissioner, Rewa...

B.R. Pandey Vs. Senior Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ashok Singh

1 WA No.751/13 26.08.2013. Shri Ashok Singh, learned counsel for appellant. Shri Vikram Singh, learned counsel for respondents. This appeal is directed against an Order dated 24.07.13 passed in WP No.12692/13 by which the writ petition...

Mir Abdul Hai &Anr vs.sanjeev Verma &Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ashok Singh, Mr. R.K. U, Mr. Jagvir Bhadana

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h October, 2017 C.R.P. 222/2017 & CM No.36507/2017 (for stay). MIR ABDUL HAI &ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashok Singh, Mr....

iran National Airlines Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Finance Act, 1979 - Sections 35 and 38(3); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129DD; Foreign Travel Tax (Amendments) Rules, 1979 - Rule 10A(1); Foreign Travel Tax (Amendments) Rules, 1994

Reported in : 2006(202)ELT588(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Singh and ;Sushama Joshi, Advs., i/b., Haresh Mehta & Co.

ORDER1. Heard Mr. Ashok Singh, the learned Counsel for the petitioner.2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner did not dispute that there was default by the petitioner in filing the Foreign Travel Tax Returns (FTT) and...

Satya Narayan Dwivedi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ashok Singh

Writ Petition No.16740/2012 08/10/2012 Shri Ashok Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Lalit Joglekar, learned Panel Lawyer, for the respondents-State on advance copy. With the consent of learned counsel for parties heard finally. Stating that...

Harshraj Vaidya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ashok Singh

M.C.C.No.998/12 08.10.2012 Heard Shri Ashok Singh, learned counsel for applicants on the application for restoration of W.P.No.7834/12. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that as he had no knowledge about peremptory order...

Dr. D.P. Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ashok Singh

1....W.A.No.890 o”17. 08.2012 Shri Ashok Singh, Counsel for the appellant. This appeal is directed against an order dated 25.7.2012 in W.P.10862 of 2012 by which a writ petition preferred by the petitioner against his transfer order...

Bankelal Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ashok Singh

W.P.No.2369/2009 05.10.2012 Shri Ashok Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. The petition is hopelessly delayed as in accordance to the petitioner himself, for the fiRs.time, the supersession had taken place in the year 1969, and repeatedly...