Harshraj Vaidya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Harshraj Vaidya vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 08, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048689

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1048689
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Oct 08, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Harshraj Vaidya

Advocate Shri. Ashok Singh

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.c.c.no.998/12 08.10.2012 heard shri ashok singh, learned counsel for applicants on the application for restoration of w.p.no.7834/12. it is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that as he had no knowledge about peremptory order dated 27.06.2012 he could not comply with the same which resulted in dismissal of the writ petition for non-compliance of the peremptory order. the application is supported by an affidavit of the applicant no.1 and as the reasons stated therein appear to be bona fide, the application for restoration is allowed. the impugned order dated 27.06.2012 passed in w.p.no.7834/12 is recalled and the aforesaid writ petition is directed to be restored to its original number subject to the petitioner clearing the default within a week and also paying p.f.within seven days for issuance of notice to the respondents in the aforesaid writ petition informing them of the restoration of the writ petition. m.c.c.stands allowed accordingly. a copy of this order be placed in the record of w.p.no.7834/12. c.c.as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge msp

Full Judgment

M.C.C.No.998/12 08.10.2012 Heard Shri Ashok Singh, learned counsel for applicants on the application for restoration of W.P.No.7834/12.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that as he had no knowledge about peremptory order dated 27.06.2012 he could not comply with the same which resulted in dismissal of the writ petition for non-compliance of the peremptory order.

The application is supported by an affidavit of the applicant No.1 and as the reasons stated therein appear to be bona fide, the application for restoration is allowed.

The impugned order dated 27.06.2012 passed in W.P.No.7834/12 is recalled and the aforesaid writ petition is directed to be restored to its original number subject to the petitioner clearing the default within a week and also paying P.F.within seven days for issuance of notice to the respondents in the aforesaid writ petition informing them of the restoration of the writ petition.

M.C.C.stands allowed accordingly.

A copy of this order be placed in the record of W.P.No.7834/12.

C.C.as per rules.

(R.S.Jha) Judge msp

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Harshraj Vaidya vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education