Advanced Search Results

Rajkumar Shukla Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ajeet Kumar Rawat

W.P.No.1379/2011 Raj Kumar Shukla vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 31.07.2013 Shri Ajeet Kumar Rawat, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Piyush Jain, learned Panel Lawyer, for the respondent/State. Heard. The petitioner has filed this petition...

Brijesh Kumar Namdeo Vs. Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgeme ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ajeet Kumar Rawat

Brijesh Kumar Namdeo & ORS.versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No.658 / 2014 16.1.2014: Shri Ajeet Kumar Rawat, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Devashish Sakalkar, learned Panel Lawyer for the State. It is stated in the...

Jiwan Ram Gupta Vs. State Thr. Cbi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Mr. Ajeet Kumar

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl. M.C. No. 2183/2011 % Reserved on: 18th January, 2012 Decided on: 8th February, 2012 JIWAN RAM GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Mr....

Vishnu Dutt Sharma Vs. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority, Gha ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1998(2)AWC1292

Advocate for Appellant : Ajeet Kumar, Adv.

D.S. Sinha, J. 1. Heard Sri Yasharth, holding brief of Sri Ajeet Kumar, learned counsel of the petitioner, and Sri U. S. Awasthi, learned counsel representing the respondents.2. The twin Principal reliefs claimed by the petitioner...

Varanasi Development Authority Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [2008(119)FLR736]

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Ajeet Kumar Singh

Bharati Sapru, J.1. Heard Sri Ajeet Kumar Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Devendra Pratap Singh holding brief of Sri B.N. Singh for the respondent workman..This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner...

Surendra Kumar JaIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ajeet Kumar Rawat

Surendra Kumar Jain & others versus State and others W.P.No.12242/2012 24/08/2012 Shri Ajeet Kumar Rawat, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri B.P.Pandey, learned Dy. GA for the respondents/ State. The petitioners claim grant of regular pay scale...

Mahesh Kumar Mishra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ajeet Kumar Rawat

Mahesh Kumar Mishra versus State & ORS.W.P.No.16237/2012 08/10/2012 Shri Ajeet Kumar Rawat, learned counsel for the petitioner. Petitioner is working as a Head Constable and has been transferred from Tikamgarh to Sagar, he has joined on...

Anti-Corruption Council of India Trust Through Its Authorised Signator ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.K. Singh, Mr. Hussain Mueen Farooq, Ms. B. Sudha, Mr. Mohd. Kamran Khan, Mr. Ajeet Kumar Sharma, Mr. Osama Abbasi, Mr. Imran Pandith

$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h October, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11455/2019 ANTI-CORRUPTION COUNCIL OF INDIA TRUST THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY A IMRAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K....

Subhash Chandra Saxena Vs. Viith Addl. District Judge, Bareilly and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 12, 16 and 18; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(3)AWC1776

Advocate for Appellant : Ajeet Kumar and ;M. Saxena, Advs.

B.K. Rathi, J.1. The premises in dispute is house No. 143-C Mohalla Zakati, Koocha Kole-walan, Bareilly. Originally, Tej Bahadur was tenant in the said house who had died leaving his only son Subhash Chandra Saxena. the...

Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Ltd. ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : RLW2008(2)Raj1018

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ajeet Kumar Sharma

S.N. Jha, C.J.1. The dispute in this appeal relates compensation for the lands bearing khasra Nos. 99 and 101 measuring 24 bighas situate at Jhalana Chod within Sanganer tehsil of Jaipur district.2. The land in question...