Advanced Search Results
Smt. Jyoti Gupta Vs. Registrar General, High Court of M.P. and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
May-07-2008
Service
2008(3)MPHT13
Mr. Aditya Sanghi
ORDERA.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. The question which arises for decision in this writ petition is whether a Public Prosecutor or Assistant Public Prosecutor who has been an Advocate for not less than seven years is eligible for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.P. Sanghi Vs. the State Bar Counsil of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-11-2006
Civil
Allotment of Chambers Rules, 1998 - Rules 3, 4 and 6; Advance Act, 1961 - Sections 5, 6, 6(1), 15(1), 16 and 17; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 14; Statutory Rules
2006(3)MPLJ612
Aditya Sanghi, Adv.
ORDERA.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. The petitioner is a Senior Advocate practicing in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur and is aggrieved by the non-allotment of a chamber to him by the respondent No. 1, State...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaghelkhand Filling Station and anr. Vs. Brijbhan Prasad and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-28-2005
Motor Vehicles
Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rule 9(2), 9(3) and 9(4); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 149(2) and 173
2006ACJ2503
J.P. Sanghi and; Aditya Sanghi, Advs.
Deepak Verma, Actg. C.J. and A.K. Saxena, J.1. This order shall govern the disposal of M.A. Nos. 1556, 1557, 1558, 1559, 1560, 1561 and 1562 of 2004.2. This and the connected appeals are being heard analogously...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Premchand Khatwani and ors. Vs. Gopal Thakre and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-16-2003
Motor Vehicles
2005ACJ980
Aditya Sanghi, Adv.
Bhawani Singh, C.J.1. This appeal is directed against the award dated 5.10.2001, passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal in Claim Case No. 46 of 2000.2. Shortly stated, the accident took place on 18.10.1999 when Tempo-Trax...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMayank JaIn Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-10-2003
Constitution
Madhya Pradesh edical and Dental Graduate Entrance Examination Rules, 2003 - Rules 5 and 9.3; Constitution of India - Articles 15(4), 16 and 16(4)
2003(4)MPHT275; 2003(4)MPLJ497
Aditya Sanghi, Adv.
ORDER1. In this writ petition preferred under Article 226 ot' the Constitution of India the petitioner has sought the relief to declare the Rule 9.3 of Madhya Pradesh Medical and Dental Graduate Entrance Examination Rules, 2003...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnkit Khare Vs. the High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Jun-27-2012
Education
Shri. M.A.Khan, Shri. Aditya Sanghi
27.6.2012 W.P.No.8783/2012, W.P.No.8568/12, W.P.No.8624/2012, W.P.No.8377/12, W.P.No.8632/2012, W.P.No.8631/2012 and W.P.No.8630/2012 Shri Anuwad Shrivastava, Shri Vipin Yadav, Shri M.A.Khan and Shri Aditya Sanghi, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri V.S.Shroti, learned senior counsel with Shri Vikram Johri, learned counsel...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSonu Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-12-2013
Education
Shri. Aditya Sanghi
W.P.No.4589/2012 12/8/2013: Shri Aditya Sanghi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Nirmala Nayak, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents State. This Court on 10.7.2013 after taking note of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGyan Prakash Vs. Government of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon' ...
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-10-2014
Education
W.P.No.529/2013 (PIL) and W.P.No.18800/2013 (PIL) 10/01/2014 Petitioner in person with Shri Aditya Sanghi, Advocate as amicus curiae in W.P.No.529/2009 (PIL).Shri Prashant Singh, Advocate for the petitioner in W.P.No.18800/2013 (PIL).Shri P.K.Kaurav, Additional Advocate General for the respondents/State....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. V.K. JaIn Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-01-2007
Constitution
2008(1)MPHT219; 2007(3)MPLJ576
Mr. Aditya Sanghi
ORDERA.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. This is a Public Interest Litigation tiled under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner who claims to be a reputed Surgeon of Indore and who is also a Member...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShiv Kumar Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-23-2012
Land Acquisition
Shri. Aditya Sanghi
1....R.P.No.666 o”23. 7.2012 Shri Aditya Sanghi, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Jaideep Singh, Dy.G.A.for the respondents No.1 and 2. Shri Rajendra Tiwar, learned Senior Advocate with Shri R.K.Tripathi, Counsel for respondent No.3. Learned counsel for Respondents/State...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »