Shiv Kumar Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Shiv Kumar Sharma vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 23, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1040893

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1040893
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jul 23, 2012
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shiv Kumar Sharma

Advocate Shri. Aditya Sanghi

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Advocate Shri. R.K.Tripathi

Excerpt

1....r.p.no.666 o”23. 7.2012 shri aditya sanghi, counsel for the petitioner. shri jaideep singh, dy.g.a.for the respondents no.1 and 2. shri rajendra tiwar, learned senior advocate with shri r.k.tripathi, counsel for respondent no.3. learned counsel for respondents/state submitted that he has been informed by the director, medical education that there is no government quota in the college of respondent no.3 and because of this the petitioner cannot be accommodated for the academic session 2012-13. the aforesaid position is disputed by the petitioner and also by shri tiwari, learned senior advocate who have submitted that there is government quota in the college of respondent no.3. it was also submitted that there is inflated quota in the college of respondent no.3 of government. in view of the aforesaid, we direct the director, medical education to file an affidavit, clarifying the aforesaid position. list for hearing on 31.7.2012. (krishn kumar lahoti) (smt. vimla jain) judge judge vj

Full Judgment

1....R.P.No.666 o”

23. 7.2012 Shri Aditya Sanghi, Counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Jaideep Singh, Dy.G.A.for the respondents No.1 and 2.

Shri Rajendra Tiwar, learned Senior Advocate with Shri R.K.Tripathi, Counsel for respondent No.3.

Learned counsel for Respondents/State submitted that he has been informed by the Director, Medical Education that there is no government quota in the College of respondent No.3 and because of this the petitioner cannot be accommodated for the academic session 2012-13.

The aforesaid position is disputed by the petitioner and also by Shri Tiwari, learned Senior Advocate who have submitted that there is government quota in the College of respondent No.3.

It was also submitted that there is inflated quota in the college of respondent No.3 of government.

In view of the aforesaid, we direct the Director, Medical Education to file an affidavit, clarifying the aforesaid position.

List for hearing on 31.7.2012.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.

Vimla Jain) Judge Judge vj

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Shiv Kumar Sharma vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Land Acquisition