Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a p lahiri · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.053 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 13 1989

Balai Chand Basak Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on : Sep-13-1989

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1990)(26)LC248Tri(Kol.)kata

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. A.P. Lahiri

1. This matter was originally filed by the appellant Shri Balai Chand Basak, proprietor, M/s. Minar Jewellers on 1st August, 1980 before the Gold Control Administrator, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi, under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 1955

Abanindra Kumar Maity and anr. Vs. A.K. Majumdar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-05-1955

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;West Bengal Bargadars Act, 1950; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115

Reported in : AIR1956Cal273,60CWN299

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Das, ;R.P. Lahiri, ;Benode Behari Haldar and ;Dwijendra Nath Basu, Advs. in all the cases, ;S.M. Bose, ;Jaineswar Majumdar, ;Mihir Kumar Sarkar and ;Smriti Kumar Roy Chaudhury, Advs. for the Appe

Chakravartti, C.J. 1. These are thirty Rules, taken out by the same or different owners of different plots of lands, so long cultivated by Bargadars under, them and are directed against orders passed by the Appellate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2003

Management of Calcutta Telephones Vs. Presiding Officer

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-14-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 25F

Reported in : (2003)IIILLJ1060Cal

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Lahiri and ;Swapan Banerjee, Advs.

Amitava Lala, J.1. This petition originally was made in he year 1997 challenging the order of the Tribunal passed on February 14, 1996, that the order of termination against the casual employees under the management of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 25 1998

Sri Faderi Ram Vs. Sri Kalika Singh and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-25-1998

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14, 16, 21 and 226;; The West Bengal Board of Secondary Education Act, 1963;; School Service Commission Act;; Recruitment Rules, 1995 - Rule 6;; Management of Recognised Non-Government Institutions (Aided and Unaided) Rules, 1969 - Rule 28(1 and 4)

Reported in : (1998)3CALLT248(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.P. Lahiri, ;Ms. Nadira Patheria and ;Mr. Tapas Saha, Advs.

S.B. Sinha, J.1. These two appeals having been directed against judgment and order dated 11-3-1998 passed by a learned single Judge of this court in Writ Petition No.22037(W) of 1997 were heard together and are being...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 2009

Biswanath Shaw Vs. the Central Bank of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-27-2009

Subject : Banking

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Asset and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 9 and 10; ;Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226; ;Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 - Rules 8(6) and 9

Reported in : AIR2009Cal243

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Lahiri, ;Swapan Banerjee and ;Lalit Mondal, Advs.

Sanjib Banerjee, J.1. The writ petitioner challenges the respondent bank's conduct in cancelling a tender and inviting further offers without reference to the petitioner who was the only eligible bidder following the initial invitation. The writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1999

Coal Indian Officers Association and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-31-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21 and 226;; Coal Mines Regulations, 1957

Reported in : (2000)2CALLT381(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Z. Rahaman, ;Mr. A.P. Lahiri, ;Mr. S. Bajerjee, ;M.K. Goswami, ;Mr. Saktinath Mukherjee, ;Mrs. Chameli Majumdar and ;Mr. Mintu Goswami, Advs.;Mr. S.K. Garai and ;Mr. P.K. Das, Advs.;Mr. Alok Bane

M.H.S. Ansari, J.1. As common questions of facts and law arise and also the commonality of the reliefs claimed in the above writ applications, all the above writ applications have been heard analogously.2. For the sake...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 1984

Keshablal Hansraj Patel Vs. Wealth-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-10-1984

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1985)12ITD665(Kol.)

1. This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 28-8-1982 of the AAC, relating to the assessment year 1977-78.2. The assessee is an individual. The subject-matter of this appeal relates to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 1963

In Re: Sulekha Works Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-19-1963

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 209(4), 372, 372(2), 372(4), 374, 433, 439, 442, 443, 443(2) and 449; ;Income Tax Act; ;Sales Tax Act; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115

Reported in : AIR1965Cal98

Advocate for Appellant : Gouri Mitter, ;J. Roy and ;Dipankar Gupta, Advs.;Samaren C. Sen and ;S.B. Mukherjea, Advs. for Amar Nath Sarma

ORDERB.C. Mitra, J.1. Sulekha Works Ltd. (hereinafter, referred to as the (Company) is a public Company which was incorporated in 1946. The objects of the Company inter alia are the manufacture of ink and allied products....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 1957

Satya Narayan Nathani Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-01-1957

Subject : Property

Acts : West Bengal Premises Requisition and Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1947 - Sections 1, 1(4), 3(1) and 4(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 31, 31A, 31(2), 31(5) and 226; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115

Reported in : AIR1957Cal310,61CWN420

Advocate for Appellant : Binayak Nath Banerjee, ;Pravat Kumar Sen Gupta and ;Amiya Kumar Chatterjee, Advs.

Chakravartti, C.J. 1. The appellant, Satya Narayan Nathani, complains of the requisition of a flat in the ground-floor of Premises No. 102-G, Russa Road, which is owned by him. He says that the requisition was not...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial