Advanced Search Results

Mohan Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentence) Rules, 1958 - Rule 9; Rajasthan Prisons Rules, 1951 - Rule 135; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 395, 397 and 460

Reported in : RLW2004(2)Raj1118; 2004WLC(Raj)UC410

Advocate for Appellant : D.N. Yadav, Adv.

Mathur, J.1. We have heard Mr. D.N. Yadav learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.R. Bishnoi learned Public Prosecutor.2. The petitioner a life convict voiced his grievances to the effect that inspite of the fact...

Smt. Vimala Devi W/O Late Banwari Lal, Vs. the State of U.P. Through I ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Regularisation of Daily Wagers Appointment on Group 'D" Posts Rules, 2001; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 309

Reported in : 2005(2)ESC1098; [2005(107)FLR42]

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Yadav and ;Dharmendra Singh, Advs.

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed that a writ of mandamus be issued to the respondents to regularise their services under the U.P. Regularisation of Daily Wagers Appointment...

Radhey Shyam and ors. Vs. District and Sessions Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 32(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC628

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Yadav, Adv.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Sri. R. N. Yadav for petitioners and Sri Manish Nigam for caveator-respondent No. 3.2. Petitioners have challenged an order dated 16.11.2002 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge (Court No. 18), Allahabad,...

Krishna Kumar Mishra and anr. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Bihar and ors. Et ...

Court : Patna

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 243D, 243D(1), 243D(2), 243D(3), 243D(4), 243D(5), 243D(6) and 243D(7); Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 - Sections 13(1), 15(7), 36(1), 38(2), 63(1), 65(2) and 88

Advocate for Appellant : Jay Nandan Singh, A.S.C.

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J. 1.The controversy relating to reservation in the matter of education and service, which started since 1951, was ultimately set at rest in the end of 1992, by the Supreme Court in Indra Sawhney...

Upendra Narayan Pandit and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Sachchidanand Jha, J.1. These two letters patent appeals by the interveners arise from the judgment and order of a learned Single Judge in CWJC No. 10942/98 directing the Bihar Public Service Commission (in short, 'the Commission')...

Ansar Ahmad Vs. Sub-divisional Officer, Kairana and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ElectionLimitation

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 12C; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Settlement of Election Disputes) Rules, 1994 - Rules 3, 4 and 4(1); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 to 24, 5, 12(2), 29(2) and 116(A); Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 81, 82, 86(1), 100(1), 101 and 117; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Election of Members and Pradhan and Up-Pradhan) Rules, 1962 - Rules 52, 55, 62, 72, 72(2) and 77

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC1807

Advocate for Appellant : Shiam Lal Mishra, Adv.

D.K. Seth, J.1. Sri Shiam Lal Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner has raised a very Interesting question as to whether the Prescribed Authority under Section 12C of U. P. Panchayat Raj Act, is empowered to...

Shamsher Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

Raj Kumar Arora CWP-5338-2012 (O&M) 2013.09.02 14:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5338-2012 (O&M).Date of decision: August 26, 2013. Shamsher Singh...

Dev Singh Thakur Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ashish Tiwari

M.Cr.C.No.11162/2013 25.09.2013 Shri Ashish Tiwari, counsel for the applicant. Shri R.N.Yadav, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. As prayed by learned counsel for the applicant, heard the learned counsel for the parties finally with the consent of...

The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Maskoor Khan Judgement Given By: Hon'b ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

M.Cr.C.No.8038/2013 4.2.2014 Shri R.N.Yadav, Panel Lawyer for the applicant/State. Heard on admission. The State has preferred an application for grant of leave to appeal against the judgment dated 8.4.2013 passed by JMFC, Bareli, District Raisen in...

Committee of Management, S.D.P.G. College Vs. V.B.S. Purvanchal Univer ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ConstitutionElection

Acts : Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 - Sections 2(13); Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 5

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC462; (2003)1UPLBEC462

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Khare and ;J.P. Singh, Advs.

Ashok Bhushan, J.1. We have heard Sri Ashok Khare, senior advocate assisted by Sri J.P. Singh for the appellant, Dr. R.G. Padia, senior advocate assisted by Sri R. N. Yadav for respondent Nos. 3 and 4...