Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dev Singh Thakur Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Dev Singh Thakur vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Sep 25, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1089717

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dev Singh Thakur

Advocate Shri. Ashish Tiwari

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

.....was dismissed. the applicant has also challenged the order dated 26.3.2012 passed by the learned additional sessions judge bijawar, district chhatarpur in criminal revision no.5/12, whereby the revision filed by the applicant was also dismissed. facts of the case, in short are that, a criminal case for the offence punishable under section 392 of ipc was registered against the applicant. in that case, during the investigation, a motorcycle bearing registration no.mp36 mb7326was seized, which was admittedly of the applicant. the applicant applied for the temporary possession of the motorcycle, but the learned j.m.f.c.vide order dated 1.3.2012 dismissed the application and the revision filed by the applicant was also dismissed. after considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it is apparent that the seized motorcycle was of the applicant himself and sufficient time will be required for the disposal of the case. in the meantime, if the motorcycle is parked at police station concerned or malkhana then, it should be deteriorated. under such circumstances, it is not necessary to keep the motorcycle with the prosecution or the court, whereas it can be given to the applicant with the conditions that if the trial court desires to get the motorcycle back then, it may be produced before the trial court. on the basis of aforesaid discussion, the petition under section 482 of cr.p.c.filed by the applicant namely dev singh thakur is hereby allowed. his application under sections 451 and 457 of cr.p.c.is also allowed. it is directed that, if the applicant furnishes a supurginama bond in the sum of `41,000/- alongwith a surety bond that he shall produce the motorcycle as and when required by the police or by the trial court on his own expenditure and he shall not sell or mortgage the motorcycle to anyone else during pendency of the case then, the motorcycle bearing registration no.mp36mb7326may be.....

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.11162/2013 25.09.2013 Shri Ashish Tiwari, counsel for the applicant.

Shri R.N.Yadav, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State.

As prayed by learned counsel for the applicant, heard the learned counsel for the parties finally with the consent of learned Panel Lawyer.

The applicant has challenged the order dated 1.3.2012 passed by the learned J.M.F.C.Bijawar, District Tikamgarh in Criminal Case No.893/11, whereby the application under Sections 451 & 457 of Cr.P.C.filed by the applicant was dismissed.

The applicant has also challenged the order dated 26.3.2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Bijawar, District Chhatarpur in Criminal Revision No.5/12, whereby the revision filed by the applicant was also dismissed.

Facts of the case, in short are that, a criminal case for the offence punishable under Section 392 of IPC was registered against the applicant.

In that case, during the investigation, a motorcycle bearing registration No.MP36 MB7326was seized, which was admittedly of the applicant.

The applicant applied for the temporary possession of the motorcycle, but the learned J.M.F.C.vide order dated 1.3.2012 dismissed the application and the revision filed by the applicant was also dismissed.

After considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it is apparent that the seized motorcycle was of the applicant himself and sufficient time will be required for the disposal of the case.

In the meantime, if the motorcycle is parked at Police Station concerned or Malkhana then, it should be deteriorated.

Under such circumstances, it is not necessary to keep the motorcycle with the prosecution or the Court, whereas it can be given to the applicant with the conditions that if the trial Court desires to get the motorcycle back then, it may be produced before the trial Court.

On the basis of aforesaid discussion, the petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.filed by the applicant namely Dev Singh Thakur is hereby allowed.

His application under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C.is also allowed.

It is directed that, if the applicant furnishes a Supurginama bond in the sum of `41,000/- alongwith a surety bond that he shall produce the motorcycle as and when required by the police or by the trial Court on his own expenditure and he shall not sell or mortgage the motorcycle to anyone else during pendency of the case then, the motorcycle bearing registration No.MP36MB7326may be handed over to the applicant on Supurginama.

Copy of the order be sent to the trial Court for information and compliance.

(N.K.GUPTA) JUDGE pnkj

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial