Advanced Search Results
Nand Nandan Sarup Vs. Dist. Magistrate and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-20-1966
Civil
Police Act, 1861 - Sections 12; Punjab Police Rules, 1934 - Rule 16.38 and 16.38(2); Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 161
AIR1967P& H342; 1967CriLJ1047; (1969)ILLJ472P& H
M.M. Punchi,; Nand Lal Punchi and; A.S. Anand, Advs.
ORDERMehar Singh, J.1. The petitioner, Nand Nandan Sarup, in this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, was, on September 16, 1968, Naib Court Foot Constable in the Court of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Raj Kumar Piarelal Jain
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-30-1958
Civil
Indian Independence (Rights, Property and Liabilities) Order, 1947 - Article 8
AIR1959P& H311
N.L. Salooja,; H.S. Gujral and; M.M. Punchi, Advs. f
D. Falshaw, J.1. These are two appeals by the Union of India (Regular First Appeals Nos. 56 and 69 of 1950) against decree for Rs. 5,373/- and Rs. 5,400/-passed by a Court at Ambala in favour...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOm Parkash Vs. Rangil Singh
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-17-2006
Tenancy
(2006)143PLR456
A.M. Punchi, Adv.
Hemant Gupta, J. 1. The present revision petition is directed against the ejectment order passed by the Courts below in respect of shop No. 83 owned by respondent at Badheri, falling within the city of Chandigarh.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ajmer Singh and ors. Vs. Virender Singh
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-19-1998
CivilFamily
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 23, Rule 3 and 3A
(1999)121PLR296
Ashu M. Punchi, Adv.
Swatanter Kumar, J.1. Learned 1st Appellate Court vide Judgment and Decree dated 31.1.1997 dismissed the appeal preferred by Ajmer Singh and Ors. (Defendants No. 1 to 3 in the suit) with costs. This judgment of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurjeet Singh Mahan Sing Vs. Wealth-tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Aug-27-1997
Direct Taxation
(1998)64ITD104(Delhi)
1. These are three appeals for assessment years 1982-83, 1983-84 and 1984-85. The following is the family tree in order to have correct appreciation of facts in this case :Jasbir Kour (Daughter of S. Mahan Singh)Kuldeep...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Chhaganlal Doshi Vs. the High Court of Judicature at Bombay and ...
Mumbai
Nov-03-1995
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 235; Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 - Rule 10 and 10(4); Civil Services Rules
1996(2)BomCR397
C.U. Singh, Adv., i/b., S.G. Udeshi, Adv.
D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has impugned Order of Compulsory Retirement dated 13th September, 1995, passed by the Governor of Maharashtra, copy whereof is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTatikonda Papaiah and ors. Vs. Land Acquisition Officer/Revenue Divisi ...
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-29-1995
PropertyCivil
Constitution of India - Article 226; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 18 and 28A
1996(1)ALT584
K. Ramakrishna Reddy, Adv.
ORDERG. Bikshapathy, J.1. The Writ Petition is filed seeking appropriate Writ or Direction declaring the proceedings No. B/737/91 dated 18-11-1992 of 1st respondent. Land Acquisition Officer, Peddapalli as arbitrary and illegal and for consequential direction to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by Its Managing Director and anr. Vs. B. Vijaya ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-31-2002
Motor vehicles Civil
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 171; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1988; Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rule 473; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 34; Interest Act, 1978; Workmen's Comepnsation Act, 1923 - Sections 4A and 4A(3)
2002ACJ1846; AIR2002AP441; 2002(4)ALT525; 2002(3)CTC385
Nanda R. Rao, SC
Ar. Lakshmanan, C.J.1. What is the reasonable interest payable on the amount of compensation awarded to a claimant in a motor accident claim case is the issue involved in these matters referred to by a Division...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijay Shankar Mishra Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Feb-17-1998
CriminalConstitution
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; Terrorism and Destructive Activities (Prevention) Act; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 241(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 314; Income Tax Act - Sections 269UD and 276A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16(1), 141, 162, 226, 309, 310, 311, 311(2) and 313; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 5, 13(1)(E) and 13(2); Contempt of Courts Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 24, 24(4), 34 and 321; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(7); Uttar Pradesh State Law Officers Rules, 1942 - Rules 2, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 10, 13 and 14; Uttar Pradesh Crown Law Officers Rules, 1942; Uttar Pradesh Forest Service Rules, 1952 - Rule 27; Audi Alt
1999CriLJ521
W.H. Khan, Adv.
S.H.A. Raza, J.1. The fate of this writ petition hinges on the upright on the following questions :1. Whether the duties of the public prosecutor/Government Advocate are statutory in nature? If so, its effect?2. Whether the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Chandigarh Food and Services Ltd., Chandigarh Vs. Union of India ...
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-07-1989
Commercial
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 299; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115
AIR1990P& H206
H.L. Sibal, Sr. Adv. and;Ajay Lamba. Adv.
ORDERM.M. Punchi, J. 1. Pithily put, the case of the petitioner is that it has been supplying meat to the Union of India through the Army Authorities of the Western Command for the last so many...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »