Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a m punchi · Page 1 of about 19 results (0.045 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 20 1966

Nand Nandan Sarup Vs. Dist. Magistrate and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-20-1966

Subject : Civil

Acts : Police Act, 1861 - Sections 12; Punjab Police Rules, 1934 - Rule 16.38 and 16.38(2); Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 161

Reported in : AIR1967P& H342; 1967CriLJ1047; (1969)ILLJ472P& H

Advocate for Appellant : M.M. Punchi,; Nand Lal Punchi and; A.S. Anand, Advs.

ORDERMehar Singh, J.1. The petitioner, Nand Nandan Sarup, in this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, was, on September 16, 1968, Naib Court Foot Constable in the Court of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 1958

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Raj Kumar Piarelal Jain

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-30-1958

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Independence (Rights, Property and Liabilities) Order, 1947 - Article 8

Reported in : AIR1959P& H311

Advocate for Appellant : N.L. Salooja,; H.S. Gujral and; M.M. Punchi, Advs. f

D. Falshaw, J.1. These are two appeals by the Union of India (Regular First Appeals Nos. 56 and 69 of 1950) against decree for Rs. 5,373/- and Rs. 5,400/-passed by a Court at Ambala in favour...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2006

Om Parkash Vs. Rangil Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-17-2006

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (2006)143PLR456

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Punchi, Adv.

Hemant Gupta, J. 1. The present revision petition is directed against the ejectment order passed by the Courts below in respect of shop No. 83 owned by respondent at Badheri, falling within the city of Chandigarh.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 19 1998

Ajmer Singh and ors. Vs. Virender Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-19-1998

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 23, Rule 3 and 3A

Reported in : (1999)121PLR296

Advocate for Appellant : Ashu M. Punchi, Adv.

Swatanter Kumar, J.1. Learned 1st Appellate Court vide Judgment and Decree dated 31.1.1997 dismissed the appeal preferred by Ajmer Singh and Ors. (Defendants No. 1 to 3 in the suit) with costs. This judgment of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1997

Surjeet Singh Mahan Sing Vs. Wealth-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Aug-27-1997

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1998)64ITD104(Delhi)

1. These are three appeals for assessment years 1982-83, 1983-84 and 1984-85. The following is the family tree in order to have correct appreciation of facts in this case :Jasbir Kour (Daughter of S. Mahan Singh)Kuldeep...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 1995

Ashok Chhaganlal Doshi Vs. the High Court of Judicature at Bombay and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-03-1995

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 235; Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 - Rule 10 and 10(4); Civil Services Rules

Reported in : 1996(2)BomCR397

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh, Adv., i/b., S.G. Udeshi, Adv.

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has impugned Order of Compulsory Retirement dated 13th September, 1995, passed by the Governor of Maharashtra, copy whereof is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 29 1995

Tatikonda Papaiah and ors. Vs. Land Acquisition Officer/Revenue Divisi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-29-1995

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 18 and 28A

Reported in : 1996(1)ALT584

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ramakrishna Reddy, Adv.

ORDERG. Bikshapathy, J.1. The Writ Petition is filed seeking appropriate Writ or Direction declaring the proceedings No. B/737/91 dated 18-11-1992 of 1st respondent. Land Acquisition Officer, Peddapalli as arbitrary and illegal and for consequential direction to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2002

The A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by Its Managing Director and anr. Vs. B. Vijaya ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-31-2002

Subject : Motor vehicles Civil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 171; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1988; Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rule 473; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 34; Interest Act, 1978; Workmen's Comepnsation Act, 1923 - Sections 4A and 4A(3)

Reported in : 2002ACJ1846; AIR2002AP441; 2002(4)ALT525; 2002(3)CTC385

Advocate for Appellant : Nanda R. Rao, SC

Ar. Lakshmanan, C.J.1. What is the reasonable interest payable on the amount of compensation awarded to a claimant in a motor accident claim case is the issue involved in these matters referred to by a Division...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 1998

Vijay Shankar Mishra Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-17-1998

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; Terrorism and Destructive Activities (Prevention) Act; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 241(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 314; Income Tax Act - Sections 269UD and 276A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16(1), 141, 162, 226, 309, 310, 311, 311(2) and 313; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 5, 13(1)(E) and 13(2); Contempt of Courts Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 24, 24(4), 34 and 321; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(7); Uttar Pradesh State Law Officers Rules, 1942 - Rules 2, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 10, 13 and 14; Uttar Pradesh Crown Law Officers Rules, 1942; Uttar Pradesh Forest Service Rules, 1952 - Rule 27; Audi Alt

Reported in : 1999CriLJ521

Advocate for Appellant : W.H. Khan, Adv.

S.H.A. Raza, J.1. The fate of this writ petition hinges on the upright on the following questions :1. Whether the duties of the public prosecutor/Government Advocate are statutory in nature? If so, its effect?2. Whether the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 1989

M/S. Chandigarh Food and Services Ltd., Chandigarh Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-07-1989

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 299; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1990P& H206

Advocate for Appellant : H.L. Sibal, Sr. Adv. and;Ajay Lamba. Adv.

ORDERM.M. Punchi, J. 1. Pithily put, the case of the petitioner is that it has been supplying meat to the Union of India through the Army Authorities of the Western Command for the last so many...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial