Advanced Search Results

Narmada Construction Company Vs. UjjaIn Nagar Palika Nigam and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 - Sections 19

Reported in : 2003(1)MPHT191

Advocate for Respondent : K. Vijayvargiya, Adv.

ORDERA.K. Gohil, J. 1. This order shall also govern disposal of Civil Revision Nos. 568, 569, 570, 571, 572 and 573 of 1996 (M/s. Narmada Construction Company, Khalghath v. Ujjain Nagar Palika Nigam, Ujjain and 2...

Harishankar S/O Kishanlal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 307; Evidence Act - Sections 145

Reported in : 1996(0)MPLJ1121

Advocate for Respondent : K.N. Vijayvargiya, Panel Lawyer

S.B. Sakrikar, J.1 This Judgment shall also govern the disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 536/89; Nana @ Basantilal v. State of M. P. and Criminal Appeal No. 540/89; Nana @ Basantilal v. State of M. P.2....

Peer Mohd. Vs. Hasinabee

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125, 271 and 482; Mohammedan Law; Muslim Women (Protection on Divorce) Act, 1985

Reported in : I(1995)DMC209; 1995(0)MPLJ664

Advocate for Respondent : Vijayvargiya, Adv.

J.G. Chitre, J.1. The petitioner is hereby praying for invoking the powers of High Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred, to as 'Code').2. The marriage between the petitioner and the...

Arun Dixit Vs. Chairman and Managing Director, Bharat Petroleum Corpor ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 294, 323 and 341

Reported in : 2002(3)MPHT441; 2002(2)MPLJ125

Advocate for Respondent : Sandeep Kochatta, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2; ;Vinay Vijayvargiya, Adv. for the Respondent No. 3, ;B.L. Pavecha, Sr. Adv. and ;Sadhna Pathak, Adv. for the Respondent No. 4

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J. 1. The question involved in this writ is a short one. The question is whether respondent No. 4 was qualified to bid for the dealership of Bharal Petroleum Corporation for commodity popularly known...

Wg Cdr Soumya Deep Das vs Union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Nidhi Raman, Mr. Rajan Prakash, Mr. Akash Mishra, Mr. Arnav Mittal, Mr. Mayank Sansonwal, Mr. Om Ram, Mr. Anilva Shishat

$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 29.01.2026+ W.P.(C) 1223/2026 WG CDR SOUMYA DEEP DAS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anurag Bhatt, Mr. Lokesh Pathak, Mr. Ansh Narayan Tripathi, Mr....

Kanhaiyalal Vs. the Board of Revenue M.P., Gwalior and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Societies Rules, 1962 - Rule 66(2) and 66(6); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 85; Madras Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act

Reported in : AIR1977MP94

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Vijayavargia, Adv., ;G.S. Solanki, Dy. Govt. Adv. and ;Nimgaonkar, Adv.

Verma, J. 1. The respondent No. 3 Society obtained an award against the petitioner for the recovery of a certain sum of money under the M. P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the...

Daya Shanker Pandey and anr. Vs. U.P. State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2001ACJ1869

U.S. Tripathi, J.1. The claimants have preferred this first appeal from the order against judgment/award dated 28.2.1983 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/2nd Additional District Judge, Basti in Claim Petition No. 12 of 1982 dismissing...

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Sushila Harendra Bahadur Singh a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Oral Judgment: 1. Admit. With the consent of the Learned Counsel for the parties heard forthwith. 2. The above First Appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 19.09.2013 passed by the Learned Member of the Motor...

Yennarkay R Rajaratnam Vs. State Of Karnataka By

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE11H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2280 OF2018BETWEEN: YENNARKAY R RAJARATNAM S/O RAVINDRAN, AGED ABOUT51YEARS, R/AT NO.3,...

Shree Shyam Pulp&board Mills Ltd. (In Liquidation) vs.tata Capital ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Rajiv Rattan

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.APP. 22/2018 SHREE SHYAM PULP&BOARD MILLS LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Ashutosh Dubey, Mr. Pranav Vashishtha and...