Advanced Search Results

Sant Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 - Sections 8, 15 and 60; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 457

Reported in : RLW2006(2)Raj890

Advocate for Respondent : Arun Sharma, Adv.

R.S. Chauhan, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the order 30.9.2005 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dholpur whereby he has rejected the application of the petitioner to release the truck involved in an offence under Section...

Raghuraj Pratap Singh Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 3, 3(3), 4, 32, 32(1), 32(5), 34, 49, 49(6) to 49(9), 52 and 60; Uttar Pradesh Gangster and and Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 2(1) and 3; Uttar Pradesh Dacoity Affected Areas Act - Sections 10; Evidence Act, 1872; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act - Sections 20; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 37; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120, 120B, 201, 302, 320, 364 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161 and 439; Arms Act; Explosives Act; Prevention of Terrorism Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)MPHT222

Advocate for Respondent : T.S. Ruprah, ;R.S. Patel, Addl. Advs. General, ;Surendra Singh, Sr. Adv. and ;Pratulya Shandilya, Adv. for ;Awdhesh Pratap Shukla, Adv.

1. In this appeal preferred under Section 34 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (for brevity 'the POTA') the defensibility and pregnability of the order dated 29-11-2005 passed by the Special Court under the POTA...

Max Hypermarket India Private Limited vs.curo India Private Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. U.K. Shandilya, Mr. Pawan Verma

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d November, 2018 CS(COMM) 95/2016 MAX HYPERMARKET INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Saransh Jain and Mr. Madhavan Sharma, Advs....

Narmada Shankar Vs. Bajrang Lal and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 10A - Order 22, Rule 10A

Reported in : RLW2005(4)Raj2557; 2005(4)WLC654

Advocate for Respondent : Preet Shandilya, Adv.

Gyan Sudha Misra, J.1. This is an application filed on behalf of the legal representatives of the deceased-respondent No. 1 praying for dismissal of the appeal as having abated since the sole-respondent No. 1-Bajrang Lal S/o...

Mukesh Kumar vs Union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Harsh Kumar, Mr. Shekhar Kumar, Mr. Neel Kr. Sharma, Ms. Shweta Shandilya, Mr. Suhail Malik, Mr. Amit Acharya, Mr. Vinod Sawant, Mr. Ajay Pal, Mr. Ramniwas Yadav

$~85 * IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1089/2026 CM APPL. 5327/2026 MUKESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....RespondentsThrough: Mr. Harsh Kumar, SPC, Mr. Shekhar Kumar,...

Sh. Vinod Kumar Mittal and Ors vs Registrar of Co-Op. Societies and Or ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Urvi Mohan, Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, Mr. Sameer Shandilya, Mr. D.S. Kundu, Mr. V.K Rastogi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1836/2026SH. VINOD KUMAR MITTAL AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit Kumar Modi, Adv.versusREGISTRAR OF CO-OP. SOCIETIES AND ORS.....Respondents Through: Ms. Urvi Mohan, Adv. Ms. Meenakshi...

Seth Oil Mills Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 14B; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Act - Sections 146; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : [2000(85)FLR591]; (2000)IILLJ407MP

Advocate for Respondent : P. Shandilya, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

D.P.S. Chauhan, J.1. By means of this petition the petitioner has challenged notice of demand issued under Section 146 of M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 asking the petitioner for depositing the amount as mentioned in the...

Krishan Kumar Wadhwa Vs. Delhi Floorings Pvt. Ltd. and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Mr. R.S. Mathur, Mr. U.K. Shandilya

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h January, 2013 % + CS(OS) 97/2010 & IA Nos.17678/2010 & 6635/2011 (both u/S 15.CPC) KRISHAN KUMAR WADHWA ..... Plaintiff Through: Dr. Bhatia &...

Pyara Lal Taheem and anr. Vs. Mohan Murti Shandilya

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mohan Shandilya, Ms. Ananya Bhattacharya

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) No. 1348 of 2012 & IA No.18426 of 2012 (u/O 15.R-2 by the Plaintiffs); IA no.4500 of 2013 (u/O XXXVIII R 5 by Plaintiffs) and...

Brahan Dutt Shukla Vs. Ashok Leyland Finance

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, - Sections 5, 8 and 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2004(1)ARBLR493(MP); 2003(4)MPHT564; 2004(1)MPLJ337

Advocate for Respondent : P. Shandilya, Adv.

Shantanu Kemkar, J.1. The appellant has filed this appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order dated 15th March, 2001 passed by the learned VIth Additional District Judge, Jabalpur in Civil...