Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: salil kumar datta · Page 1 of about 169 results (0.079 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 26 1973

P.V. Nayudu and ors. Vs. Andhra Pradesh Mining Corporation and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-26-1973

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1974)IILLJ353AP

Obul Reddy, J.1. These two writ petitions filed by employees of the Andhra Pradesh Mining Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation), raising a common question, are directed against the orders of the Corporation terminating...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 1978

Bombay Gas Company Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Mercantile Bank Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-08-1978

Subject : Company

Acts : Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 5, 6(1), 6(2), 38, 44, 44(1) and 49C; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 173(2), 190 and 433

Reported in : [1980]50CompCas202(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Mukerjee, ;P.K. Das and ;Jayanta Mitra, Advs.

Salil K. Roy Chowdhury, J. 1. This is a winding up petition presented by a contributory on the 26th of September, 1977, for the winding up of the company on the ground that the substratum of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1975

Shyam Sunder Charkraborty Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-14-1975

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1977)ILLJ305Cal

Amiya Kumar Mookerji, J.1. This Rule is directed against an order of transfer dated 9-12-74 passed by the Post Master General, West Bengal Circle by which the petitioner was transferred from Lake Gardens Post Office in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 29 1970

Hindusthan General Insurance Society Ltd. Vs. Punam Chand Chhajar

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-29-1970

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Section 19

Reported in : AIR1971Cal285

Advocate for Respondent : Amarendra Mohan Mitra, ;Dipti Kana Basu and ;Bhabesh Chandra Ghose Roy, Advs.

S.K. Chakravarti, J.1. The only point that arises for determination in this appeal is as to whether a contract of insurance is liable to be avoided by the insurer on account of the fact that there...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 1972

Asmi Pramanik Vs. Vice-chancellor, Burdwan University and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-19-1972

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Burdwan University Regulations - Regulations 7 and 18

Reported in : AIR1972Cal482,76CWN787

Advocate for Respondent : Tapas Banerjee and ;Malay K. Ghosh, Advs.

Salil Kumar Datta, J. 1. The petitioner in this case appeared in B. A. Part II Examination of 1971 of the Burdwan University. The marks he obtained in the said examination would be evident from the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 1964

Shellac Industries Ltd. Vs. their Workmen (represented by Shellac Indu ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-16-1964

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 7, 7(1), 8, 10, 10(1) and 33B; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 21

Reported in : AIR1966Cal371

Advocate for Respondent : Salil Kumar Datta, Adv.

Datta, J. 1. This is a Rule directed against the award of the 7th Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal arising out of a dispute between the workers of the petitioner company represented by its Union, the Shellac...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 1981

Gauribidnaur Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane Ltd. Vs. the Government of Andh ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-13-1981

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1981Kant187; 1981(1)KarLJ555

Advocate for Respondent : G.N. Seshagiri Rao, Adv.

ORDER1. The writ petitioner is a Cooperative Society registered under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 and is running a Sugar Factory at Gouribidanur in Kolar Dist. Gouribidanur is approximately at a distance of 15 kilometres...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 1985

The Coffee Board Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-16-1985

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 5(3), 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 17

Reported in : ILR1986KAR1365; 1985(2)KarLJ397; [1985]60STC142(Kar)

Advocate for Respondent : N. Santosh Hegde, Advocate-General

ORDERPuttaswamy, J.1. On a reference made by one of us, these cases were posted before a Division Bench for disposal. 2. A statutory Board called 'the Coffee Board' ('the Board') which was formerly called the Indian...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1980

New Satgram Engineering Works and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-14-1980

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3(1), 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 17(1), 18, 18(1), 18(2), 18(3), 18(4), 18(5), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(3), 19(4), 19(6), 19(7), 20 to 27; Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 - Sections 22(3); Coal Mines Nationalisation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1978; Coal Mines (Taking over of Management) Act, 1973; Coal Mines (Taking over of Management) Ordinance, 1973; Constitution of India - Article 32 and 226; Coal Mines (Conservation, Safety and Development) Act, 1952 - Sections 4; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Coal Mines Provident Fund, Family Pension and Bonus Schemes Act, 1948 - Sections 3C, 20(3), 21, 22, 23, 24, 24-A, 25, 26, 26(1) and 26(5); Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Constitution of India (Thirty ninth Amendment) Ac

Reported in : AIR1981SC124; (1980)4SCC570; [1981]1SCR406

Sen J.1. These appeals by special leave from a judgment of the Delhi High Court, involve interpretation of Section 2(h) of the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973, as amended by the Coal Mines Nationalisation Laws (Amendment)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 1976

Ram Khilari and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-10-1976

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 16; Railway Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968 - Rules 9 to 13 and 14

Reported in : AIR1976Raj219; 1976(9)WLN300

Advocate for Respondent : C.L. Agarwal and; L.R. Bhansali, Advs.

ORDERD.P. Gupta, J.1. These 29 writ petitions arise in somewhat similar circumstances and, therefore, it would be proper to dispose them of by a common order.2. The petitioners in all these writ petitions were employed in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial