Advanced Search Results
C. Sathiyanathan Vs. Veeramuthu
Chennai
Nov-14-2008
Criminal
Scheduled Caste and Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1), 7, 14, 18, 19, 20 and 23; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 4, 4(2), 5(2), 26, 29, 154, 156(3), 174, 200, 200(1), 360, 438 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 463, 464, 465, 466 and 471; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act; Customs Act; Scheduled Caste and Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995 - Rules 5 to 7
2009CriLJ1512
S. Packiaraj, Adv.
ORDERP.R. Shivakumar, J.1. This criminal original petition has been filed invoking the inherent powers of the High Court under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code to quash the criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioner herein in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Muthuram Vs. the Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Khadi and Vill ...
Chennai
Jun-17-2009
Service
Constitution of India - Article 20(2); Board's Service Regulations - Rules 3 and 34
(2009)5MLJ1287
S. Packiaraj, Adv.
ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. Challenging the proceedings of the 1st respondent in Na.Ka. No. 21315/E3(1)/2002 dated 11.08.2003 and the consequential Board's Order in (Ms) No. 9, dated 08.03.2004 and for a direction to the 1st respondent to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhanavel Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Feb-12-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 12-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI1. Dhanavel S/o.Arumugam, No.10, Ramanpettai, Manikavalasu, Salangapalayam, Gundhapadi, Singanallur Post, Bhavani Tk, Erode District-638 4552. R.Palanisamy S/o.Rangasamy No.7, Ramanpettai, Salangapalayam, Bhavani Tk, Erode District-638...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
V.S. Babu and Mrs. Suyambukaniammal Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu, ...
Chennai
Jul-07-2006
Property
(2006)3MLJ762
P. Wilson, Spl. Govt., Pleader for R.1 and D.Veerasekaran for R2 and 3
P. Sathasivam, J.1. The writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 07.12.2001 made in WP.No.24069 of 2001, in and by which the learned Judge, based on the conclusion of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG.Ganammal and ors. Vs. the Govt of Tamilnadu and ors.
Chennai
Jun-19-2012
Property
Land Acquisition Act - Section 4(1), 5(A),; Constitution of India - Section 226; Land Acquisition Rules - Rules 4(b)
Mr.R.Rajeswaran Spl.G.P, Adv.
PRAYER: Writ Petition has been filed under section 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records in G.O,Ms.248 Housing and Urban Development (U.D.III) dated 09.03.1994 and quash...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr.Selvajothi Ranjitham Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Apr-28-2014
Education
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJ.W.P.No.1002 of 2013 Dr.Selvajothi Ranjitham S.P .Petitioner -versus 1. The Government of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Secretary Department of Health Fort...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Subramanian Vs. K. Rajendran and ors.
Chennai
Apr-21-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109, 148, 420, 427, 448 and 453; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 190(1), 197, 197(1), 200, 202, 204, 245(2), 460 and 483
2007CriLJ4092
S. Ayyathurai, Adv. for Respondent No. 1
ORDERT. Sudanthiram, J.1. This petition has been filed to quash the proceedings pending against the petitioner herein who is 7th accused in C. C. No. 3 of 2005, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate II,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs.C.Mailammal vs the District Collector
Chennai
Feb-19-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 19.02.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE C.Mailammal ... Petitioner Vs.Gujji Naicken Street, Chennai - 30. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Muthambika Vs. the Chairman,
Chennai
Apr-23-2010
Service
S. Packiaraj, Adv. for Respondents 1 to 3
ORDERT. Raja, J.1. The short point raised in the present Writ Petition is that the petitioner was removed from service by the second respondent, by an order of removal passed by the disciplinary authority who was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD.Gurusamy .Vs. Dr.Shanthini Kapoor Ias, and ors.
Chennai
Aug-31-2010
Contempt of Courts
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Section 11
Mr.S.Packiaraj; Mr.S.Sathiamurthi, Advs.
1. The petitioner herein seeks to punish the respondents under Section-11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for having violated the order, dated 26.10.1999, passed in W.P. No.11015 of 2009, whereby, the respondents were directed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »