Advanced Search Results
Cit Vs. Lakshmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd.
Delhi
Dec-03-2012
Direct Taxation
Mr. S.N. Kumar, Mr. K.B. Soni
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:03.12.2012 + ITA 1288/2011 CIT Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Puneet Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel. Versus LAKSHMI SUGAR MILLS...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurendra S/O Laxman Nikose Vs. Chief Manager and Authorized Officer St ...
Mumbai Nagpur
Aug-14-2013
Education
Mr. S. N. Kumar
Oral Judgment: (A.S. Chandurkar, J.) 1. Heard Mr. P. S. Tiwari learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. N. Kumar learned Counsel for the respondent. 2. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and heard by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mahalakshmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd.
Delhi
Nov-27-2000
Direct Taxation
Pepsu Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1954 - Sections 8(2); Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 41(2) and 256(1)
2001IAD(Delhi)599; [2001]249ITR90(Delhi)
S.N. Kumar and ; K.B. Soni, Advs.
D.K. Jain, J.1. At the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. Delhi Bench 'D' (for short 'the 'Tribunal''), has referred, under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'), the following...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Union of India and Others Vs. Jagir Singh
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-08-1993
SICA
Sick Textile undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3; Sick Textile Undertakings (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1972 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 31-B; Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Ordinance, 1974
AIR1993P& H223; [1994]80CompCas47(P& H); (1993)104PLR134
Mr. S.N. Kumar, Sr. Adv. and; Mr. P.S. Saini, Adv.
ORDERM.R. Agnihotri, J.1. This letters patent appeal arises out of the judgment of learned single Judge delivered in C.W.P. No. 1294 of 1975 on 4th June, 1991, whereby while allowing the writ petition filed by one...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSardar Carbonic Gas Co. Vs. Sher-i-punjab Tading Co. and ors.
Delhi
Aug-06-1976
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 40
15(1979)DLT129
Shri. S.N. Kumar
Yogeshwar Dayal, J.(1) This order will dispose of LA. 444 of 1976 filed by the plaintiff under order 40 rule 1 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for appoiltment of receivers for taking...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay Tandon Vs. Sarabjit Singh
Delhi
Apr-30-1997
PropertyContract
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1
AIR1997Delhi380; 67(1997)DLT686; 1997(42)DRJ426
Shri. S.N.Kumar
K.S. Gupta, J. (1) This appeal by Sanjay Tandon, plaintiff-appellant, is directed against the order dated November 21, 1996 of learned Single Judge whereby No. 879/96 filed by him under Order Xxxix Rules 1 & 2...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors. Overruled
Supreme Court of India
Dec-30-1981
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 32, 74, 74(1), 74(2), 124, , 136, 139A, 163, 216, 217, 217(1), 217(2), 218, 221(1), 222, 224, 224(1) 226, 233(1), 234 and 368; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 166; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 133, 162 and 162(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 91 and 92 - Order 17, Rule 2 - Order 31, Rule 19A; Evidence Act - Sections 114, 123, 124, 132, 162 and 162(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 220; Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968
AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365
P.N. Bhagwati, J.1. These writ petitions filed in different High Courts and transferred to this Court under Article 139 of the Constitution raise issues of great constitutional importance affecting the independence of the judiciary and they...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChitralekha Bukshi Vs. Abhay Sapru and anr.
Delhi
Dec-20-2002
PropertyFamily
103(2003)DLT152; 2003(67)DRJ181
S.N. Kumar, Sr. Adv. and ; S.K. Gupta, Adv.
Usha Mehra, J. 1. The learned Single Judge by the impugned judgment allowedthe amendment of the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff. Theappellant/defendant is aggrieved by the said amendment and, thereforee,this appeal. 2. In order to appreciate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShamsher Singh Sandhu Vs. Union of India and Others
Jammu and Kashmir
Jan-29-2014
Education
1. These two writ petitions relating to two different causes, filed by the petitioner, have been clubbed and heard together. Though SWP no. 2729/2012 is the first in point of time, yet I deem it appropriate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSusheela S vs the Unified Souharda Credit Co Op Ltd
Karnataka
Mar-17-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 44514 OF 2018 (CS-RES) BETWEEN1. SUSHEELA S W/O G RUDRAPPA AGED...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »