Advanced Search Results

Mohammed Nachiyar and ors. Vs. Hirudaya Dass

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Pondicherry Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1971 - Sections 3(4) and 10

Reported in : AIR1983Mad81

Advocate for Respondent : Thirugnanam, Adv.;S. Govindaswami, Govt. Pleader, Pondicherry

1. The intention of the enactment is not to give power only for the landlord to evict the tenant under some ground or other. Under the provisions of Section 3(4) (a) of the Pondicherry Cultivating Tenants...

Mytrah Energy (India) Limited Vs. Gamesa Renewable Private Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. This application is filed by the applicant/second defendant to revoke the leave granted to the first respondent/plaintiff by this Court in A.No.5574 of 2015 dated 18.08.2015 to institute C.S.No.697 of 2015. 2. For the sake...

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Bharati Adhik Patil and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Rule. By consent of the parties, rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally. 2. In this appeal, the judgment and award dated 31.7.2013 passed by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Kolhapur, in Application (WCA)...

Gangaram Kandaram Vs. Sunder Chikha AmIn and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 470; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 405, 406 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections - 155(2), 156(1), 157, 468, 469, 470 and 482; Government of India Act - Sections 107

Reported in : 2000(2)ALD824; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)625; 2000(2)ALT448

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. C. Subba Rao, Adv. and Goverment Pleader for Home

ORDERV. Eswaraiah, J 1. The 1st respondent in this appeal is the writ petitioner and the 7th respondent in the writ petition is the appellant in this writ appeal. For the sake of clarity, the parties...

Rukmani Ammal Vs. the Union Territory of Pondicherry, Represented by t ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1984)2MLJ198

ORDERS. Nainar Sundaram, J.1. W.P. Nos. 798 & 833 of 1980.: The petitioner is the same in both the writ petitions. A few facts are necessary to appreciate the grievance of the petitioner in these two...

Oriental Fire and Genl. Ins. Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Mira Devi and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : I(1991)ACC229,1991ACJ155

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Sharma, Adv.

Bhawani Singh, J.1. The Oriental Fire & General Insurance Co. Ltd. and the owner of the vehicle have assailed the award of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mandi in Claim Petition No. 68 of 1981, decided on...

State of Madras, Represented by Deputy Commr. of Commercial Taxes, Mad ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 8

Reported in : AIR1954Mad885; (1954)IIMLJ138

Advocate for Respondent : S. Srinivasan, ;V. Thyagarajan, ;B. Santhalingam and ;C.S. Govindaswami, Advs.

Rajagopalan , J.1. The same question of law arises in these applications and they have been heard together. These cases deal with sellers in flowers, fruits and vegetables in the Madras markets. It was not disputed...

Pondicherry Fertiliser Co. Vs. Union Territory of Pondicherry

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Pondicherry General Sales Tax Act

Reported in : [1982]51STC37(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : S. Govindaswamy, Government Pleader for Pondicherry

Sethuraman, J.1. This is a revision petition to revise the order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pondicherry. It relates to the assessment year 1974-75. The assessee is a dealer in fertilisers. According to the assessee,...

Shanmugham Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Subject : CustomsFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7(1) and 16(1)

Reported in : 1989(42)ELT196(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : S. Govindaswamy, Public Prosecutor (Pondicherry)

ORDER1. This petition coming on for hearing on Monday the fourth day of April, 1988 and on this day, upon perusing the Petition and the order of the Lower Courts, and the record in the case...

B. Prabhakar and anr. Vs. Bachima

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110AA; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 3(5)

Reported in : I(1985)ACC230; AIR1984Kant225

Advocate for Respondent : A.J. Gunjal, Adv.

Sabahit, J. 1. This appeal by the employer and the insurer is directed against the Judgment and Award dated 14-4-1980 made by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation Chikmagalur, in KOC/WEA/4/79-80 on his file directing the employer...