Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: ram prasad · Page 1 of about 2,060 results (0.213 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 02 2000

Mahboob Alam and ors. Vs. Khatiza Khatoon and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Feb-02-2000

Subject : Property

S.K. Chattopadhyaya, J.1. This letters patent appeal is directed against the concurrent findings of fact, by reason of which the learned Single Judge dismissed First Appeal No. 138 of 1985(R) filed by the plaintiffs-appellants affirming the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1984

Ram Mani Gupta and ors. Vs. Mohammad Ibrahim and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-13-1984

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 92A

Reported in : I(1985)ACC505; [1986]60CompCas977(All)

Advocate for Respondent : Sudhir Chandra, Adv.

O.P. Saxena, J. 1. This is an appeal under Section 110D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, against the order dated April 25, 1970, passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (III Addl. District Judge), Allahabad,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

Queen-empress Vs. Imam Ali and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1888)ILR10All150

John Edge, Kt., C.J.1. Two men, Imam Ali and Amiruddin, were convicted by the Magistrate of Shahjahanpur Under Section 295, Indian Penal Code, for having on the 30th August 1887, at Tilhar municipality on the side...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 29 1921

Ram Prasad Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-29-1921

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : AIR1921All246(1); 65Ind.Cas.554

Lindsay, J.1. This is an application by one Ram Prasad against whom an order has been made by the District Magistrate of Muzaffarnagar on the 2nd of September 1921. A certified copy of this order is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1920

Murtaza Khan Vs. Lalta Singh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-30-1920

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1920All191; 58Ind.Cas.729

Rafique, J.1. The facts which have given rise to this revision are as follows:One Bhadani executed a deed of mortgage in respect of a house in favour of the applicant, Murtaza Khan. The latter sued for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 2010

Suraj Bhan Meena and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-07-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 309,

1. Since common questions of fact and law are involved, five Special Leave Petitions have been taken up for hearing and final disposal together. While SLP(C)No.6385 of 2010 has been filed by Suraj Bhan Meena &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 1955

Raghubir Saran Agarwal Vs. Ram Prasad Misra

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-26-1955

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 499; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 439

Reported in : AIR1956All267; 1956CriLJ470

Advocate for Respondent : Aqiq Hasan, Adv.

ORDERRoy, J.1. A complaint had been lodged by Raghubir Saran Agarwal in the Court of the City. Magistrate, Banaras, against two persons under Section 500, Penal Code on the allegation that certain utterances made toy them...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 1939

Smt. Asharfi Kuer Vs. Smt. Ram Pearey

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-22-1939

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1939All442

Thom, C.J.1. These are two connected appeals by the defendant in a suit for accounts and may appropriately be disposed of in one judgment. The relief claimed by the plaintiff is in the following terms:The defendant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 1929

Bikram Singh and anr. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-07-1929

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1929All535

1. The two appellants Bikram Singh and Nanhey Singh have been convicted, the first under Section 302 read with Section 114, I.P.C., and the second under Section 302, I.P.C., and sentenced to transportation for life.2. That...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2002

Raj Kumar Yadav (In Jail) Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-07-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 299 and 300; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 27, 32 and 32(1)

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2075

Advocate for Respondent : A.G.A.

M.C. Jain, J. 1. Having been convicted by the then IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad by judgment dated 16-10-1994 in S.T. No. 4 of 1992 and S.T. No. 5 of 1992, the accused has preferred this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial