Advanced Search Results

Post Master General Vs. District Judge

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106 and 113; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 25; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2006All1; 2006(1)AWC282

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Mishra, Adv. and ;B.P. Verma, S.C.

ORDERVikram Nath, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the tenant, Postmaster General, U.P. Lucknow and two others praying for writ of certiorari quashing the judgment and order dated 20 7-1996 passed by the District...

Lakshmikant Ingole Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

30.8.2012 W.P.No.5231/2009 Shri R.P.Mishra, earned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.P.Rai, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. In this writ petition, the...

Haseen Siddiqui @ Jahangir Vs. State of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Law and ...

Court : Allahabad Lucknow

Subject : MRTP

Arvind Kumar Tripathi (II), J. 1. This writ petition has been filed by Haseen Siddiqui @ Jahangir for issuing a writ or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the administrative order dated 22.4.2013 passed by...

Laxminarayan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 W.P.No.9977/12 25/07/12 Shri R.P.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Panel Lawyer for the State. Petitioner was appointed as a 'Daily wages employee' in the year 1998. His services were terminated...

Balmoo Baiga Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

W.P.No.20257/2012 (Balmoo Baiga & ORS.versus State of M.P.& Ors.) 05.12.2012 Shri R.P.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Puneet Shroti, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State on advance copy. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioners...

Vishwanath Prasad Mishra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

W.P.No.1187/2012 11.10.2012 Shri R.P.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Lalit Joglekar, learned Panel Lawyer for respondents. Though earlier the writ petition was admitted by this Court and notices were issued to the respondents, no return...

M/S Prahlad Rai and ors. Vs. Nagar Panchayat,jaisinghnagar and ors

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. R.P. Mishra, Shri. Anshul Dixit, Shri. R.K. Patel, Shri. Som Mishra

1 Writ Petition No. 2701 Of 2001 5.8.2013 None for the petitioneRs.Shri R.P. Mishra, learned Counsel for respondent No. 8. Shri Anshul Dixit, learned counsel for respondent No. 9. Shri R.K. Patel, learned counsel for respondent...

U.S. Kushwaha Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

W.P.No.17922/2012 05.12.2012 Shri R.P.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Lalit Joglekar, learned Panel Lawyer for respondents No.2 and 4, on advance copy. The petitioner was allocated to the State of Chhattisgarh on re-organisation of State...

Gayatri Devi Daughter of Late Bhoopal Das Vs. Principal, P.M.V. Polyte ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh (Recruitment of Government Servants) Dying In Harness Rules, 1974; Uttar Pradesh (Recruitment of Government Servants) Dying In Harness (Fifth Amendment) Rules, 1999 - Rule 5

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2974

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Goyal, Adv. and ;C.S.C.

V.C. Mishra, J.1. Heard Shri R.P. Mishra learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri A.K. Goel learned Counsel for the respondents. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged On the joint request of learned Counsel for...

New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Mohsina and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(2007)ACC75

R.P. Mishra, J.1. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. It has been submitted by learned Counsel for the appellant that it was specific issue No. 4 which was raised before the Claim Tribunal that...