Advanced Search Results

Krishna Rice Mills and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Banking

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1973 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2583

Advocate for Respondent : Satish Chaturvedi, ;R.K. Saxena, Advs. and ;S.C.

Palok Basu and Ratnakar Dash,JJ.1. Petitioner M/s. Krishna Rice Mills through its partners Arun Kumar. Smt. Prakashwati Devi widow of late Krishna Prasad and Smt. Bina Devt wife of Ashok Kumar have challenged the recovery proceedings...

Vishwanath Singh and anr. Vs. Kumari Kamlesh Priyadarshi, District Ins ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 12

Reported in : (1997)3UPLBEC1554

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Saxena, Sr. Standing Counsel and ;S.C.

O.P. Garg, J.1. This is an application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 with the prayer that the opposite-party Km. Kamlesh Priyadarshi be summoned and punished for her wilful and deliberate disobedience...

Gajendra Singh Vs. Joint Director of Education, Agra and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Dying-in-Harness Rules

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2632; (1999)3UPLBEC1914

Advocate for Respondent : S.C., ;P.K. Jain and ;R.K. Saxena, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner claims to have been appointed on 14th September. 1995, in the post of Chowkidar in the Mahatma Gandhi Sniarak Inter College, Sonkh, district Mathura. According to him, instead of paying salary...

Vinod Kumar Singh Vs. District Magistrate, Mau and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 1999(4)AWC3508

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Saxena, S.C

D.K. Seth, J.1. Pursuant to an order dated 10.4.1996 in Writ PetitionNo. 949 of 1995, the case of the petitioner was considered by the respondent No. 1, viz., the District Magistrate, Mau by order dated 8.8.1996...

Bharthari Prasad Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Fundamental (Financial Handbook, Volume 2, Parts II to IV) Rules - Rule 56; Uttar Pradesh Judicial Officer (Retirement on Superannuation) Rules, 1992 (J.O.R. Rules) - Rules 1, 2 and 3; Constitution of India - Articles 309, 310 and 311; Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Rules 56 (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1970; Civil Service Regulations - Articles 465 and 465A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC1606

Advocate for Respondent : Sunil Ambwani, ;R.K. Saxena, Advs. and ;S.C.

Palok Basu, J. 1. Shri Bharthari Prasad erstwhile member of the Higher Judicial Service of this State has challenged the order dated 27.11.98 passed by the State of U. P. compulsorily retiring him.2. When the writ...

Dr. Jagdish Singh Katiyar and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Regularisation of Ad Hoc Appointments (On Posts with the Purivew of Pulbic Service Commission) Rules, 1979 - Rules 2, 4, 4(2), 4(6), 5 and 6; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2219

Advocate for Respondent : S.C., ;Umesh Narain Sharma, ;R.K. Saxena and ;Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advs.

Palok Basu and S.K. Jain, JJ.1.Bereft of the details of all the relevant writ petitions, the principal question involved in this bunch of the writ petition is whether petitioners Dr. Jagdish Singh Katiyar. Dr. Israr Ahmad,...

Vijai Shankar Saini Vs. Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226

Reported in : (1997)1UPLBEC262

Advocate for Respondent : S. C. and ;R.K. Saxena, Adv.

D.K. Seth, J.1. Sri S. N. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the service of the petitioner with respondent No. 3 in the post of Salesman was dispensed with by an order dated 30-6-1987....

Mohammad Usmanul Haq Vs. Deputy Collector/Election Registration Office ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Election

Acts : Registration of Electorals Rules, 1960 - Rules 12 and 13(3)

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC594

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and ;R.K. Saxena, Adv.

Palok Basu and Lakshmi Bihari,JJ.1. Shri Shashi Nandan, learned counsel for the petitioner argued 3 points :(1) In the Instant case the impugned order dated 8.1.2002 is without jurisdiction because the Electoral Officer has in a...

Surender Singh vs.narender Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.K. Saxena

$~5 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"24th January, 2018 RC.REV. 316/2012 & CM No.12066/2012 SURENDER SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Proxy versus Advocate. ..... Respondent Through: Mr....

Sohan Singh Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1987Supp(1)SCC169

G.L. Oza and; V. Khalid, JJ.1. Heard learned counsel on both sides. Notice was issued in this case restricted only to sentence. This Court noted the facts that the question of sentence deserved consideration in the...