Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sohan Singh Vs. State of U.P.

Sohan Singh vs State of U.P.

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Feb 10, 1987
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/666989

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Supreme Court of India
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Appeal No. 392 of 1976
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- [G.L. Oza and; V. Khalid, JJ.] -- Criminal Trial — Sentence — Accused appellant being totally blind according to jail doctor's certificate, sentence reduced to the period already undergone as his movement in jail would be impossible without outside support -- Notice was issued in this case restricted ...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sohan Singh

Respondent

State of U.P.

Legal References

Reported In
1987Supp(1)SCC169

Excerpt

- [g.l. oza and; v. khalid, jj.] -- criminal trial - sentence - accused appellant being totally blind according to jail doctor's certificate, sentence reduced to the period already undergone as his movement in jail would be impossible without outside support -- notice was issued in this case restricted only to sentence. the appellant has produced a certificate issued by dr r.k. saxena, medical officer, district jail, moradabad. the bail bond of the appellant is discharged.g.l. oza and; v. khalid, jj.1. heard learned counsel on both sides. notice was issued in this case restricted only to sentence. this court noted the facts that the question of sentence deserved consideration in the light of the physical condition of the appellant. the appellant has produced a certificate issued by dr r.k. saxena, medical officer, district jail, moradabad. from this certificate it is seen that the appellant is totally blind and there is some infirmity in his left lower limb also. since he is totally blind, his movement in the jail will be impossible unless there is some support from outside. in these circumstances we are of the opinion that no purpose would be served by continuing him in jail to suffer the rest of the sentence. accordingly, we modify the sentence passed and direct that the sentence already undergone by the appellant will, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, meet the ends of justice. since the appellant is on bail, he need not surrender. the bail bond of the appellant is discharged.

Full Judgment

G.L. Oza and; V. Khalid, JJ.

1. Heard learned counsel on both sides. Notice was issued in this case restricted only to sentence. This Court noted the facts that the question of sentence deserved consideration in the light of the physical condition of the appellant. The appellant has produced a certificate issued by Dr R.K. Saxena, Medical Officer, District Jail, Moradabad. From this certificate it is seen that the appellant is totally blind and there is some infirmity in his left lower limb also. Since he is totally blind, his movement in the jail will be impossible unless there is some support from outside. In these circumstances we are of the opinion that no purpose would be served by continuing him in jail to suffer the rest of the sentence. Accordingly, we modify the sentence passed and direct that the sentence already undergone by the appellant will, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, meet the ends of justice. Since the appellant is on bail, he need not surrender. The bail bond of the appellant is discharged.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial