Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: r g deo · Page 1 of about 21 results (0.117 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 20 1997

Garware Plastics and Polyester Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of Indi ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-20-1997

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 11-A, 35-A and 36(2); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173-B; Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963; Customs, Central Excise and Salt and Central Boards of Revenue (Amendment) Act, 1977

Reported in : 1998(3)ALLMR777; 1998(2)BomCR845; 1998(97)ELT256(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : R.G. Deo, Adv.

ORDERN.P. Chapalgaonker, J.1. Petitioner No. 1- a Private Limited Company is the producer of the polyester films. On 11th November 1976, they had filed a classification list under Rule 173-B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2000

Gyarasidevi Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-27-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 171, 171(6) and 226(3)

Reported in : [2001]250ITR342(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : R.G. Deo and ;V.D. Sapkal, Advs.

1. We have heard Mr. V. D. Hon, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr, R. G. Deo, learned standing counsel for the Union of India as well as Mr. V. D. Sapkal, learned Additional Government...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 1986

Kondiba Son of Chokha Kamble Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-09-1986

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 304

Reported in : 1986(2)BomCR241

Advocate for Respondent : R.G. Deo, A.P.P.

G.M. Khandekar, J.1. This is an appeal by the accused, who has been convicted by the learned Session Judge, Beed, in session Case No. 26 of 1981 for offence of murder under section 302 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 23 1998

Dr. Abdul Khadar Khan Vs. Shri Javed Siraj Quazi and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-23-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections - 132, 137 and 138; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 54; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123 and 124; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 498-A; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 2; General Clauses Act - Sections 6

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR341; 1999(2)BomCR304

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Deshpande, Adv. and ;R.G. Deo, Addl. Counsel

ORDERA.B. Palkar, J.1. This revision application is filed by original plaintiff in Special Civil Suit No. 62/1991, on the file of the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalgaon, against an order passed on 3-1-1998 on Exhibit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 2005

Tulsabai W/O Narayanrao Deshpande (Died) Through L.R. Madhavrao Naraya ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-25-2005

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14, 14(1) and 14(2); Hindu Law; Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937; Shastric Hindu Law; Transfer of Property Act, 1872 - Sections 8; Evidence Act - Sections 110; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100 and 101

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR144; 2006(2)MhLj219

Advocate for Respondent : R.G. Deo, Adv. for respondent No. 2, ;R.M. Borde, Adv. for respondent No. 3, ;P.M. Shah, Sr. Counsel and ;Mukul Kulkarni, Adv. for respondent No. 5, ;A.S. Deshmukh, Adv. for respondent No. 6, ;R.D. De

Vasanti A. Naik, J. 1. This Letters Patent Appeal involves two important questions, one regarding the applicability of Section 14(1) and (2) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and the other about interpretation of a document...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2000

Smt. Gyarasidevi Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-27-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(Bom)382

ORDERBy The Court:We have heard Mr. V.D. Hon, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.G. Deo, learned standing counsel for the Union of India as well as Mr. V. D, Sapkal, learned Addl. Government Pleader...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 1979

State of Maharashtra Vs. Sewaram Aaildas Aamesar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-24-1979

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1979CriLJ1463

Pratap, J.1 This appeal by the State is directed against the order of acquittal dated 11th March 1977 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thane, in Criminal Case No. 192 of 1973 which was instituted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1998

Sarjerao S/O Ramrao Pole Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-22-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226; Maharashtra Government Prisoness Manual, 1979 - Rule 2; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 1998(5)BomCR834; 1999CriLJ1433

Advocate for Respondent : K.B. Choudhary, A.P.P.

ORDERV.K. Barde, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith for hearing with the consent of learned Counsel for the parties.2. This writ petition is filed by son of the convict - Ramrao Dattarao Pole who is undergoing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 1980

Sk. Bale S/O Fateh Mohammad Vs. HafizoddIn S/O Dadubhai and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-06-1980

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 223, 323, 395, 488, 494 and 506(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 202, 204 and 245(1); Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 1982(1)BomCR545

Advocate for Respondent : N.B. Chapalgaokar, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1, 3 to 6, 9 and 11, ;A.V. Sawant, Adv. for respondent No. 7, ;R.M. Agarwal, Adv. for respondent Nos. 12 to 15 in Criminal Revision Application No. 318 of 1

C.S. Dharmadhikari, J.1. The petitioner Shaikh Bale son of Fateh Mohammad filed a complaint against 16 persons on the allegations that they have committed offences under sections 395, 488, 494, 506(2), 323 read with section 34...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 1982

Venkat Dharmaji Gontalwar Vs. Vishwanath and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-19-1982

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 94 and 151 - Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 ; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53-A

Reported in : AIR1983Bom413; 1983(1)BomCR374; 1983MhLJ284

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Deshmukh, Adv.

1. Plaintiff -Appellant is the prospective purchaser of the Suit-land Gut No. 63. It is alleged that the portion of this suit-land to the extent of 8 Acres 10 Gunthas was purchased, by plaintiff under a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial