Advanced Search Results

Yasoda Sharma Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(1)JCR569(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Pradeep Modi, G.P.-I

ORDERTapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. V. Shivnath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pradeep Modi, learned G.P.-I and with their consent this writ petition is being disposed off at this stage. At the outset, Mr....

Jai Jyoti Kishore Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 22; Memorandum of Association Rules - Rule 20; Service Law

Reported in : [2004(4)JCR769(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Pradeep Modi, GP-I

Tapen Sen, J.1. Heard the parties.2. The petitioner prays for quashing the order dated 10.6.2002 issued by the respondent No. 4 removing the petitioner from service without holding any departmental enquiry. According to the petitioned the...

Savitri Bala Devi Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2004(1)JCR567(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Pradeep Modi and; Sarvendra Kumar, Advs.

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Heard the parties.2. The petitioner who is the widow of Late Parmeshwar Ram has approached this Court for a direction upon the respondents for payment of Group Insurance amount on the death of...

Raghunath Prasad Tiwari Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR326(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Pradeep Modi, Adv.

ORDERTapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. V. Shivnath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pradeep Modi, learned counsel for the respondents.2. This writ application was filed on 12.3.2001. Ten days prior there to, i.e. on 2.3.2001,...

Bimal Kumar Agarwal Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 6, 6A and 7

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR689(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Pradeep Modi, Adv.

Tapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. S.L. Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pradeep Modi, learned G.P.-I for the respondents.2. The writ petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 26/10/1999 (Annexure-3) passed by the respondent...

Motilal Saw and ors. Vs. A.K. Chouhan, Director-cum-secretary of Healt ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 11 and 12

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR456(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Pradeep Modi, G.P. I

ORDERTapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mrs. M.M. Pal,learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Pradeep Modi, learned G.P.I for the opposite parties.2. The instant Contempt Application has been filed for non- compliance of the Judgment delivered by this...

Amarjit Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 6A, 6B and 613

Reported in : AIR2007Jhar23; [2006(4)JCR407(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Pradeep Modi, G.P. - I

Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application is for quashing of the order dated 26.10.1999 as contained in Annexure-4, passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Singhbhum East at Jamshedpur whereby, in a...

Baleshwar Prasad Vs. the State of Bihar,

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2006(4)JCR213(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Pradeep Modi, G.P. - I

Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. The petitioner has prayed for issuance of writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 23.01.1998 (Annexure-7) by which the petitioner who was an Assistant was dismissed from the service and also for...

Rohini Dobya Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2004(4)JCR298(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Pradeep Modi, G.P.I.

ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J.1. At the very outset I must express my serious anguish and displeasure towards the manner in which the cases are conducted by the State Counsels, 1 am told by Mr. Pradeep Modi, learned...

Employers in Relation to Manag Vs. Their Workmen Being Represente

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (L) No. 6002 of 2009 Employers in relation to the Management of Kusunda Area of M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, PO Kusunda, PS Putkee, Distrcit...