Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr u bhuyan · Page 1 of about 142 results (0.039 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 26 2000

Keshrichand Jaisukhlal Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Sep-26-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131, 145(1) and 256(2)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. U. Bhuyan, Adv.

D. Biswas, J. 1. By this judgment and order, both the references made under Section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, hereinafter referred to as the 'Act', are being disposed of. 2. The identical questions to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2001

Rajesh Sharma Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-13-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132, 132(5), 132(11), 132A, 132B and 230A(1); Indian Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1992; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922; Constitution of India - Article 226; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Sections 112

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. U. Bhuyan, Adv.

1. The issue under judicial scrutiny in this application under Article 226 of the Constitution pertains to the non-release of the seized assets which were found to have been properly explained under section 132(5) of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2001

Rajesh Sharma Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-13-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132, 132(5), 132(11), 132A, 132B and 230A(1);; Indian Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1992;; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922;; Constitution of India - Article 226;; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Section 112

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. U. Bhuyan, Adv.

1. The issue under judicial scrutiny in this application under Article 226 of the Constitution pertains to the non-release of the seized assets which were found to have been properly explained undersection 132(5) of the Income...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 27 2000

Sudhir Trivedi Vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Sep-27-2000

Subject : Service

Advocate for Respondent : N.M. Lahiri, B. Goyal, U. Bhuyan and R.P. Sharma, Advs.

J.N. Sarma, J. 1. CR 662/97 has been filed for a direction for restoration of seniority of the petitioner as Divisional Manager in Arunchal Pradesh Forest Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter called 'APFC Ltd.') by necessary revision/amendment of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2009

Pancharatna Cement P. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-30-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)227CTR(Gau)267,[2009]317ITR259(Gauhati)

Amitava Roy, J.1. By the challenge laid in the instant proceeding, the petitioner seeks to abrogate the process of reassessment sought to be initiated by the impugned notice dated September 13, 2007, issued by the Deputy...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2005

M.S. Associates Vs. Uoi

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-22-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. P. Upadhyaya

I.A. Ansari, J. The five appeals enlisted above are being disposed of by this common judgment and order, for all these appeals have arisen out of the common judgment and order, dated 31-5-2004 (see M.S. Associates...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2007

Anupam Choudhury Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Dec-14-2007

Subject : Property

H.N. Sarma, J.1. This case depicts a pathetic situation of a citizen, suffering at the hands of the respondent who has taken possession of his landed property without any formal acquisition order under the provisions of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 2010

Shri Tilak Saikia Vs. State of Assam.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-04-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : IPC - Section 409

Advocate for Respondent : Ms B Das; Mr. D. Baruah, Advs.

1. Heard Mr. U. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner. The respondents 1 and 2 are represented by Ms. B. Das, learned Govt. Advocate. Mr. D. Barua, learned CGC appears for the Accountant General(AG). 2. 1The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 2005

Bamboo Bagicha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-28-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : S. Sharma, A.C. Borbora, G.N. Sahewalla, K. Agarwal and U. Bhuyan, Advs.

I.A. Ansari, J.1. I have heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. D Barua, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. S Sharma, learned standing counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 5....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2006

Atul Chandra BuragohaIn Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Sep-19-2006

Subject : Criminal

I.A. Ansari, J.1. Whether a judicial magistrate can direct investigation or further investigation to be conducted by the Central Bureau of Investigation (commonly known as 'CBI') This is the principal question, which has been raised for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial