Advanced Search Results

Prithviraj Ambalal Patel Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Insutrument Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 143(2); Negotiable Insutrument Amendment Act, 2002

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)9; III(2003)BC613; 2003BomCR(Cri)1713

Advocate for Respondent : K.G. Patil, APP and ;P.M. Shah, Senior Counsel For Respondent No. 4

B.B. Vagyani, J. 1. Rule returnable forthwith. With consent of parties, taken up for final hearing forthwith. 2. In all the criminal writ petitions, common question is raised and, therefore, all these criminal writ petitions are...

The Executive Engineer Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Collector ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Patni

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and learned counsel for respondent No. 3-A. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, heard finally. 3. During pendency of...

Sitabai Kerba Deotarse and ors. Vs. Anil Sahebrao Deotarse and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 39 and 39(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 2A and 11;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 2A and 11

Reported in : 2006(5)BomCR833; 2006(2)MhLj65

Advocate for Respondent : P.F. Patni, Adv. for respondent No. 1 and ;V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 5 to 7

S.B. Deshmukh, J.1. Heard Mr. Barhate, learned Counsel for the petitioners; Mr. P. F. Patni, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 and Mr. V. H. Dighe, learned AGP for respondent Nos. 5 to 7, respondent Nos....

Dr. Prabhakar Singh Vs. M.D., U.P. Seeds and Tarai Development Corpora ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [2001(90)FLR1038]; (2002)IIILLJ18UC

Advocate for Respondent : Dobhal, Adv.

A.A. Desai, C.J. and P.C. Verma, J. 1. Heard Mr. Patni, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Dobhal learned counsel for the respondents at length.2. The petitioner was sent on deputation to Tarai Seed Corporation...

Madhya Pradesh Rajya Bhumi Vikas Nigam Vs. Kasturidevi Dhanna and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(1987)ACC373; 1986MPLJ93

Rampal Singh, J.1. The appellant, by this appeal, filed undfer Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, has challenged the award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Gwalior (for short, hereinafter called 'the Claims...

Kulbhushan Singhal and ors. Vs. Gyan Singh and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : 3(2005)ACC611

S.H. Kapadia, C.J.1. Being aggrieved by the award dated 6.5.1995 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Third Additional District Judge, Nainital, in M.A.C.T. Case No. 542 of 1991, the claimants and the owner of the offending...

Kulbhushan Singhal and ors. Vs. Gyan Singh and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 168

Reported in : 2005ACJ1035; AIR2004Utr36

Advocate for Respondent : Sudhir Kumar and; D.S. Patni, Advs.

1. Being aggrieved by the Award dated 6th May 1995 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/IIIrd Additional District Judge, Nainital in MACT Case No. 542 of 1991, the claimants and the owner of the offending vehicle...

M/S. Kasliwal Constructions Vs. Madhukar

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad

Subject : MRTP

S.M. Shembole, Presiding Judicial Member: 1. Challenge in this appeal is the judgment and order dated 10.09.2008 passed by District Consumer Forum, Aurangabad partly allowing consumer complaint No.361/2006 directing the appellant/opponent to make repairs in the...

Kantabai W/O Sureshchandra Doshi and ors. Vs. Ahmed Khan Chand Khan (D ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140, 147, 147(2), 163A and 168; Workmen's Compensation Act; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 95 and 95(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 33

Reported in : IV(2006)ACC266; 2006ACJ2481; 2006(4)ALLMR305; 2006(5)BomCR672; 2006(4)MhLj161

Advocate for Respondent : A.A. Joshi, Adv., i/b., ;K.M. Loya, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1A to 1C and ;D.V. Soman, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

S.B. Deshmukh, J.1. This group of Appeals, involve common questions of law and fact, and therefore are heard and decided by this common judgment.A) MACP. No. 221 of 1991, was filed by one Kantabai Wd/o Sureshchandra...

Sandu Alias JamaluddIn Madarbhai and anr. Vs. Maruti S/O Trimbak and a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 98; Hyderabad Abolition of Inams and Cash Grants Act, 1954 - Sections 6; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2005(1)MhLj521

Advocate for Respondent : A.A. Joshi, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

S.B. Deshmukh, J.1. Heard Shri Patni, Advocate for petitioners and Shri A. A. Joshi, Advocate for respondent No. 1.2. This petition takes an exception to the judgment and order passed by the learned Member, Maharashtra Revenue...