Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr d v sehgal · Page 1 of about 16 results (0.103 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 25 1983

Harnam Singh Vs. Surjit Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-25-1983

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13 and 13(3); Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14-A and 14(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 and 17 - Order 2, Rule 2; Delhi-Ajmer Marwar Rent Control Act, 1947 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1984P& H126

S.S. Sandhawalla, C.J.1. Is the requirement of personal use and occupation by the landlord under sub-section (3)(a)(i) a distinct and separate cause of action from that of non-payment of rent under sub-sec (2)(i) for the eviction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1982

Surta Singh Vs. Pritam Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-25-1982

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 8, 8(1) and 8(2); Indian Limitation Act, 1961 - Schedule - Article 60; Guardianship and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 29; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 44; Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 60; Indian Contract Act - Sections 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 32, Rule 7

Reported in : AIR1983P& H114

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. D. V. Sehgal

S.S. Sandhawalia, C.J.1. Whether a transfer of immovable property by a natural guardian in contravention of Section 8 (1) and (2) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 can be challenged by way of a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2004

Bpl Cellular Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Mar-03-2004

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2004)2CompLJ65TelecomDSAT

1. This petition under Section 14(a)(i) of Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 (as amended) was filed by the petitioner, a service provider, on or about 15.02.2001.2. Petitioner is one of the two cellular mobile...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 12 1994

Hans Raj and ors. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-12-1994

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1994(5)SCALE216; 1995Supp(1)SCC405; 1995(1)LC150(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ujagar Singh

Paripoornan J.1. These are connected appeals. The appellants in both the appeals are the same persons. But the respondents are different in the two different suits and appeals. Civil Appeal No. 808/92 is filed against the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 1982

Amrik Rai Vs. Sat Pal Sood and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-19-1982

Subject : Family

Acts : Guardians and Wards Act - Sections 17, 19 and 25; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 6 and 13; Divorce Act

Reported in : AIR1983P& H301

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Awasthy

1. The petitioner father has been disentitled to the custody of his two minor children by the trial Court. He appeals. The children are now with their maternal grand-parents, the respondents.2. Smt. Rani, wife of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 1995

Indian Council and Enviro-legal Action Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-09-1995

Subject : Environment

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3(3); Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 - Rule 5(3)

Reported in : AIR1995SC2252; JT1997(10)SC444; (1995)3SCC77; 1995(1)LC732(SC)

ORDER1. We have heard Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Mr. Kapil Sibal, Mr. Ashok Desai, Mr. D.V. Sehgal and other learned Counsel appearing in this case. We modify our order dated December 12, 1994 and direct that all...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 1996

improvement Trust, Moga Vs. Manchanda Soap Works and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-16-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 - Sections 26, 27, 36, 38, 40(3), 41(1), 78 and 79

Reported in : 1996IVAD(SC)397; AIR1996SC2019; JT1996(5)SC20; (1996)114PLR111; 1996(4)SCALE171; (1996)8SCC686; [1996]Supp1SCR402

1. This appeal by special leave arises from the Judgment of a Division Bench of the Punjab & Haryana High Court made on October 3, 1988 in CWP No. 1809 of 1986. The fact fairly are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2003

State of U.P. and ors. Vs. Vam Organic Chemicals Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-17-2003

Subject : Excise

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Licences for the Possession of Denatured Spirit and Specially Denatured Spirit Rules, 1976 - Rules 2 and 3; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 3(9), 3(11), 3(13) and 18G; Uttar Pradesh Excise Act, 1910 - Sections 40(1), 40(2) and 41; Oil and Alcohol Taxation (Amendment) Act, 1976; Ethyl Alcohol (Price Control) Orders; Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951 - Sections 76; Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 - Sections 548

Reported in : AIR2003SC4650; JT2003(8)SC1; 2003(8)SCALE775; (2004)1SCC225

Ruma Pal, J. 1. Leave granted in the special leave petition.2. A series of writ petitions were filed by the respondents in the Allahabad High Court challenging a notification dated 13thJanuary 1990 whereby licence fee of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 1993

Sales Tax Officer Vs. Palco Lining Co. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-12-1993

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Section 21

Reported in : 1993Supp(3)SCC529

Kuldip Singh and; B.P. Jeevan Reddy, JJ.1. The main question for consideration before the High Court was whether collar lining (bukram) is a cotton fabric for the purposes of U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 (the Act)....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1996

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-19-1996

Subject : Environment

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 32; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Sections 2, 24, 25, 26 and 27; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

Reported in : JT1997(1)SC221; 1996(9)SCALE397; (1997)2SCC411; [1996]Supp10SCR383

Advocate for Respondent : D. P. Gupta, ; Solicitor General, ; K.T.S. Tulsi, ;

Kuldip Singh, J.1. This petition - public interest - under Article 32 of the Constitution of India was initially directed against the tanneries located in the city of Kanpur. This Court by the order dated September...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial