Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: manish kumar nigam · Page 1 of about 13 results (0.076 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 28 2002

Raj Kishore Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-28-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 9A, 11, 48 and 52

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1326

Advocate for Respondent : Manish Kumar Nigam, S.C. and ;Satyendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

Ashok Bhushan, J.1. Heard Sri Sankatha Rai, counsel for the petitioner and Sri Satyendra Kumar Singh and Manish Kumar Nigam appearing for the contesting respondents. Counter and rejoinder-affidavits have been exchanged and both the parties had...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2002

Dr. (Km.) Archana Gupta Vs. Joint Director of Education, Bareilly and ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-07-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Commission and Selection Boards Act, 1982 - Sections 33B; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Regulation - Regulation 3

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC2100; (2002)3UPLBEC2213

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Srivastava, Adv. and ;Subodh Kumar, S.C.

Sunil Ambwani, J. 1. By this writ petition, petitioner Dr. Km. ArchanaGupta, Lecturer (Civics) and officiating as Principal of Arya Kanya Inter College, Shahjahanpur, has prayed for quashing the order dated 31.1.2000 passed by Joint Director...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2004

Narendra Kumar and anr. Vs. Collector and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-23-2004

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 3(4); Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 287, 279 and 281; Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 - Sections 183; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : (2004)2UPLBEC2037

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Gaur and ;S.C.

V.M. Sahai, J.1. The questions that arise for consideration in this petition are whether there is any limitation for recovering the sum due as arrears of land revenue under the U.P. Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 14 2007

Km. Sumbul Naqvi D/O Shri Intakhab Haider Naqvi Vs. State of U.P. Thro ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-14-2007

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Reported in : 2008(2)AWC1722

Arun Tandon, J.1. The State of U.P. took a decision on 16.2.2005 to conduct two years Special B.T.C. Training Course (Urdu) for appointment of Assistant Teachers Urdu, against 3000 posts, said to be lying vacant in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2005

Sridharlal Srivastava Vs. Shiv Prakash Verma and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-17-2005

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : 2006(2)AWC1238

Advocate for Respondent : None

Poonam Srivastava, J. 1. Heard Sri Manish Kumar Nigam and Sri Rahul Sahai, learned Counsel for the applicant.2. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed against an order dated 6.1.2005,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 2010

Ashutosh Kumar Srivastava and Others. Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-01-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. This revision is directed against the order dated 10.12.2009 passed the Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 12, Varanasi in Criminal Revision No. 174 of 2009 (Anil Kumar Srivastava v. Ashutosh Kumar Srivastava), whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2003

Dilip Kumar Sharma and anr. Vs. Civil Judge (Senior Division) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-01-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 40, Rules 1 to 5

Reported in : AIR2004All86; 2003(4)AWC3291

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Nigam, ;V.K. Burman, ;Rahul Chaturvedi and ;H.N. Pandey, Advs.

Sunil Ambwani, J. 1. By this writ petition, Sri Dilip Kumar Sharma, claiming himself to be Secretary/ Pradhan Mantri of Committee of Management, Sri Giriraj Sewak Samiti, Bara Bazar, Goverdhan, Mathura (in short 'Society'), and Shri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2002

Radhey Shyam Vs. Ishwari Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-09-2002

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1)

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC687

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Srivastava, Adv.

S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, praying for quashing the judgment and order dated 29.11.2002 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition) passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 2009

Om Prakash Gupta Vs. District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-19-2009

Subject : CivilTenancy

Reported in : 2010(1)AWC521

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. M.K. Nigam

Poonam Srivastav, J.1. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Srivastava, learned Counsel for petitioner and Sri Manish Kumar Nigam, counsel for contesting respondents.2. Petitioner preferred a release application under Section 21(1)(a) of U.P. Act No. XIII of 1972...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2005

Ram Chandra Singh Vs. Mahendra Nath Gupta

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-04-2005

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1), 22, 23 and 34; Limitation Act - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 - Order 9, Rule 13; Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules - Rule 32

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC694; 2005(2)AWC1106

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Nigam, Adv.

Anjani Kumar, J.1. By means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-tenant challenges the Order passed by the prescribed authority/VIIIth A.C.M.M., Kanpur Nagar in Misc. Rent Case No. 16/74...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial