Advanced Search Results

Punjab National Bank Vs. Sh. Harish Sharma and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Ordered r 9 Rules 4 and 9; Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : 2004IAD(Delhi)106; AIR2003Delhi458; III(2004)BC260; [2004]121CompCas142(Delhi); 107(2003)DLT244; 2003(71)DRJ150

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Talwar, Adv.

H.R. Malhotra, J. 1 These are two applications made by the plaintiff one under Ordered r 9 Rules 4 and 9 read with Section 151 CPC and another under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.2 This...

Mehra Cosmetics vs.ram Kumar Gulati & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K.K. Sharma, Mr. Suwarn Rajan

$~12. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.196/2016 MEHRACOSMETICS ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Mohan Vidhani, Mr. Rahul Vidhani and Ms. Gita, Advs. versus RAM KUMAR GULATI & ORS. ..... Defendants...

Madan Singh and anr. Vs. Vee Pee International Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ritesh Kumr Bahri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Gupta, Mr. K.K. Sharma, Ms. Jasbir Kaur

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h March, 2013 + CRL. M.C. 2071/2012 MADAN SINGH & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Adv. with Mr. Harpreet Singh, Adv....

CaptaIn P.K. Bakshi, Nautical Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. K.K. Sharma, Shri. Asish Nischal

1. In this OA the applicant has sought quashing and setting aside of the order of respondents dated 25.11.2005 whereby he was transferred and posted to Marine Engineering and Research Institute, Kolkata (MERI, for short) along...

CaptaIn P.K. Bakshi, Nautical Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through (the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. K.K. Sharma, Shri. Asish Nischal

1. In this OA the applicant has sought quashing and setting aside of the order of respondents dated 25.11.2005 whereby he was transferred and posted to Marine Engineering and Research Institute, Kolkata (MERI, for short) along...

Municiapal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Ajay Kumar Jain

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2001VAD(Delhi)311; 92(2001)DLT173; 2001(59)DRJ366

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K.K. Sharma, Adv.

ORDERD.K. Jain, J. 1. This appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the Lahore High Court, as applicable to the High Court of Delhi, is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge...

Ultramed Private Ltd. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Companies Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 206, 406, 409, 420 and 424; General (Criminal) Rules, 1980 - Rule 16

Reported in : RLW2006(2)Raj1564; 2006(3)WLC170

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Sharma, Adv.

K.S. Rathore, J.1. The petitioner is a private limited company registered under the Companies Act and the present petition is filed through its Managing Director, Dr. Anil Sharma, for the purpose of issuance of writ order...

Modi Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49

Reported in : AIR1992Raj51; 1991(1)WLC452; 1991(2)WLN219

Advocate for Respondent : G.S. Bapna and; K.K. Sharma, Advs.

ORDERInder Sen Israni, J. 1. All the writ petitions mentioned above raised same question of law, hence they are decided by one order. 2. Through these writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged the legality and validity...

Shrigopal Industries Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1985]58STC75(Raj)

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Sharma, Adv.

1. By order dated 3rd August, 1972, passed under Section 15 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred as 'the Act'), the Board of Revenue has referred the following question for the opinion of this...

National Coal Corporation Vs. Appellate Authority, Industrial and Fina ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Company

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 13(2), 15(1), 15(2) and 20

Reported in : II(2003)BC104; [2004]122CompCas355(Raj); RLW2003(4)Raj2437; 2002(5)WLC944

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Sharma and; Amit Sharma, Advs.

K.S. Rathore, J.1. The petitioners are the Small Scale Industries situated at Kota. The petitioner No. 1 was supplying coal. Petitioner No. 2 undertook the work of repairing and maintaining the machines. Petitioner No. 3 manufactured...