Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: k k sharma and · Page 1 of about 393 results (0.189 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 10 2003

Punjab National Bank Vs. Sh. Harish Sharma and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-10-2003

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Ordered r 9 Rules 4 and 9; Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : 2004IAD(Delhi)106; AIR2003Delhi458; III(2004)BC260; [2004]121CompCas142(Delhi); 107(2003)DLT244; 2003(71)DRJ150

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Talwar, Adv.

H.R. Malhotra, J. 1 These are two applications made by the plaintiff one under Ordered r 9 Rules 4 and 9 read with Section 151 CPC and another under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.2 This...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2006

Ultramed Private Ltd. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-08-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Companies Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 206, 406, 409, 420 and 424; General (Criminal) Rules, 1980 - Rule 16

Reported in : RLW2006(2)Raj1564; 2006(3)WLC170

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Sharma, Adv.

K.S. Rathore, J.1. The petitioner is a private limited company registered under the Companies Act and the present petition is filed through its Managing Director, Dr. Anil Sharma, for the purpose of issuance of writ order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2001

Municiapal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Ajay Kumar Jain

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-24-2001

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2001VAD(Delhi)311; 92(2001)DLT173; 2001(59)DRJ366

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K.K. Sharma, Adv.

ORDERD.K. Jain, J. 1. This appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the Lahore High Court, as applicable to the High Court of Delhi, is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 27 1984

Shrigopal Industries Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-27-1984

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1985]58STC75(Raj)

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Sharma, Adv.

1. By order dated 3rd August, 1972, passed under Section 15 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred as 'the Act'), the Board of Revenue has referred the following question for the opinion of this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 1991

Modi Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-08-1991

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49

Reported in : AIR1992Raj51; 1991(1)WLC452; 1991(2)WLN219

Advocate for Respondent : G.S. Bapna and; K.K. Sharma, Advs.

ORDERInder Sen Israni, J. 1. All the writ petitions mentioned above raised same question of law, hence they are decided by one order. 2. Through these writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged the legality and validity...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 1984

District Electrical Engineer Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-15-1984

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1987]65STC101(Raj)

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Sharma, Adv.

S.C. Agarwal and S.N. Bhargava, JJ.1. These references raise common questions for consideration and, therefore, they are being disposed of by a common order. In all these references the following questions have been referred to this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2002

Hakim Mohammad Abdul Rahim Khan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-19-2002

Subject : Property

Acts : Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rule 26, 26(1) and 26(3)

Reported in : 2002(2)WLC587

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Sharma, Adv. for Respondents 2 & 3

Sharma, J. 1. The question that arises for consideration in the instant matter relates to interpretation of Rule 26 of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 (in short, 1960 Rules).2. Contextual facts depict that the petitioner submitted an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 2002

National Coal Corporation Vs. Appellate Authority, Industrial and Fina ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-19-2002

Subject : Company

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 13(2), 15(1), 15(2) and 20

Reported in : II(2003)BC104; [2004]122CompCas355(Raj); RLW2003(4)Raj2437; 2002(5)WLC944

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Sharma and; Amit Sharma, Advs.

K.S. Rathore, J.1. The petitioners are the Small Scale Industries situated at Kota. The petitioner No. 1 was supplying coal. Petitioner No. 2 undertook the work of repairing and maintaining the machines. Petitioner No. 3 manufactured...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2004

Devender Singh Vs. Freedom Fighter Division and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-04-2004

Subject : Service

Reported in : 114(2004)DLT634; 2006(1)SLJ481(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Sharma, Adv.

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Petitioner by this writ petition, seeks a direction to the respondents to release the freedom fighter pension to him from the date of its suspension along with interest. Further, quashing of letters dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 1984

Abdul Rashid and anr., Etc. Vs. Ram Dayal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-07-1984

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110(3); Accident Claims Tribunal (Rajasthan) Rules, 1964 - Rule 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22

Reported in : AIR1986Raj30

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Sharma and; R.M. Lodha, Advs.

Guman Mal Lodha, J.1. Both these appeals relate to an accident which took place on 9th Dec., 1972 at about 12.30 p.m. While Ram Dayal, the respondent, was coming from the side of the General Hospital,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial