Advanced Search Results
Punjab National Bank Vs. Sh. Harish Sharma and ors.
Delhi
Jul-10-2003
LimitationCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Ordered r 9 Rules 4 and 9; Limitation Act - Sections 5
2004IAD(Delhi)106; AIR2003Delhi458; III(2004)BC260; [2004]121CompCas142(Delhi); 107(2003)DLT244; 2003(71)DRJ150
R.K. Talwar, Adv.
H.R. Malhotra, J. 1 These are two applications made by the plaintiff one under Ordered r 9 Rules 4 and 9 read with Section 151 CPC and another under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.2 This...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUltramed Private Ltd. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Rajasthan
Feb-08-2006
Civil
Companies Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 206, 406, 409, 420 and 424; General (Criminal) Rules, 1980 - Rule 16
RLW2006(2)Raj1564; 2006(3)WLC170
K.K. Sharma, Adv.
K.S. Rathore, J.1. The petitioner is a private limited company registered under the Companies Act and the present petition is filed through its Managing Director, Dr. Anil Sharma, for the purpose of issuance of writ order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMuniciapal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Ajay Kumar Jain
Delhi
Apr-24-2001
Service
2001VAD(Delhi)311; 92(2001)DLT173; 2001(59)DRJ366
Mr. K.K. Sharma, Adv.
ORDERD.K. Jain, J. 1. This appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the Lahore High Court, as applicable to the High Court of Delhi, is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shrigopal Industries Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Mar-27-1984
Sales Tax
[1985]58STC75(Raj)
K.K. Sharma, Adv.
1. By order dated 3rd August, 1972, passed under Section 15 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred as 'the Act'), the Board of Revenue has referred the following question for the opinion of this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskModi Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
May-08-1991
Electricity
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49
AIR1992Raj51; 1991(1)WLC452; 1991(2)WLN219
G.S. Bapna and; K.K. Sharma, Advs.
ORDERInder Sen Israni, J. 1. All the writ petitions mentioned above raised same question of law, hence they are decided by one order. 2. Through these writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged the legality and validity...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDistrict Electrical Engineer Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Mar-15-1984
Sales Tax
[1987]65STC101(Raj)
K.K. Sharma, Adv.
S.C. Agarwal and S.N. Bhargava, JJ.1. These references raise common questions for consideration and, therefore, they are being disposed of by a common order. In all these references the following questions have been referred to this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHakim Mohammad Abdul Rahim Khan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Rajasthan
Feb-19-2002
Property
Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rule 26, 26(1) and 26(3)
2002(2)WLC587
K.K. Sharma, Adv. for Respondents 2 & 3
Sharma, J. 1. The question that arises for consideration in the instant matter relates to interpretation of Rule 26 of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 (in short, 1960 Rules).2. Contextual facts depict that the petitioner submitted an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Coal Corporation Vs. Appellate Authority, Industrial and Fina ...
Rajasthan
Aug-19-2002
Company
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 13(2), 15(1), 15(2) and 20
II(2003)BC104; [2004]122CompCas355(Raj); RLW2003(4)Raj2437; 2002(5)WLC944
K.K. Sharma and; Amit Sharma, Advs.
K.S. Rathore, J.1. The petitioners are the Small Scale Industries situated at Kota. The petitioner No. 1 was supplying coal. Petitioner No. 2 undertook the work of repairing and maintaining the machines. Petitioner No. 3 manufactured...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevender Singh Vs. Freedom Fighter Division and ors.
Delhi
Oct-04-2004
Service
114(2004)DLT634; 2006(1)SLJ481(Delhi)
K.K. Sharma, Adv.
Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Petitioner by this writ petition, seeks a direction to the respondents to release the freedom fighter pension to him from the date of its suspension along with interest. Further, quashing of letters dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Rashid and anr., Etc. Vs. Ram Dayal and ors.
Rajasthan
Aug-07-1984
Motor VehiclesCivil
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110(3); Accident Claims Tribunal (Rajasthan) Rules, 1964 - Rule 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22
AIR1986Raj30
K.K. Sharma and; R.M. Lodha, Advs.
Guman Mal Lodha, J.1. Both these appeals relate to an accident which took place on 9th Dec., 1972 at about 12.30 p.m. While Ram Dayal, the respondent, was coming from the side of the General Hospital,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »