Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: j c saha · Page 1 of about 33 results (0.132 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 05 2002

A.W. Figgis and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-05-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961

Reported in : [2002]256ITR268(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : D. Deb, ;P.K. Bhoumick, ;M.P. Agarwal, ;Md. Nizamuddin, ;J.C. Saha and ;Sumit Kumar Chakraborty, Advs.

Tarun Chatterjee, J. 1. The following questions were referred to this court for our opinion under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') : '1. Whether in view of the fact that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2003

i.M.C. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-22-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Interest-tax Act, 1974 - Section 10

Reported in : (2003)183CTR(Cal)445,[2003]261ITR731(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : J.C. Saha and ;Md. Nizalmuddin, Advs.

Girish Chandra Gupta, J.1. The subject matter of challenge in this writ petition comprises two several notices both dated February 12, 1999, issued under Section 10 of the Interest-tax Act, 1974, seeking to reopen the assessment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2003

C.E.S.C. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-22-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143, 143(1), 143(2), 143(3) and 154

Reported in : (2003)183CTR(Cal)116,[2003]262ITR243(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : J.C. Saha, Adv.

Girish Chandra Gupta, J. 1. The notices issued under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, seeking to rectify summary assessments made under Section 143(1)(a) of the aforesaid Act for the assessment years 1990-91, 1992-93,1993-94 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 07 1999

Hope (India) Ltd. (Now Poddar Udyog Ltd.) Vs. Commissioner of Income-t ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-07-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 5, 22, 23 and 23(1); ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act

Reported in : (1999)155CTR(Cal)561,[1999]238ITR740(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : J.C. Saha and ;P.K. Bhowmick, Advs.

S.B. Sinha, J.1. This reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, has been made by the Income-tax Tribunal, Bench-C, Calcutta, in respect of the following question ;'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2002

Sambhu Prasad Agarwal, Vs. Director of Income-tax (investigation) and ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-08-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Section 132 and 132(9A)

Reported in : [2002]254ITR660(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : D.K. Shome and ;J.C. Saha, Advs.

Amitava Lala, J.1. This writ petition is made challenging the search and seizure carried out by the income-tax authority on October 16, 2001, and for withholding books, documents and papers seized in the course of such...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2003

Hindusthan Tea Trading Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-11-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 141; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 68, 131, 133 and 256

Reported in : (2003)182CTR(Cal)585,[2003]263ITR289(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : M.P. Agarwal and ;J.C. Saha, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The reference under Section 256(1) has since been made to this Court on the question, viz.,'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in upholding the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 1996

Orient Beverages Ltd. Vs. Appropriate Authority and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-22-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 269UC and 269UC(4); ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [1997]226ITR317(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : J.C. Saha, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2

V.K. Gupta, J.1. The order dated December 13, 1995, purported to have been passed under Section 269UC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by respondent No. 1, is under challenge in this petition. Under this order, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 1996

indo Asahi Glass Company and anr. Vs. Income-tax Officer and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-17-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 201; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [1996]222ITR534(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Mallick and ;J.C. Saha, Advs.

V.K. Gupta, J.1. This appeal by the appellants, Indo Asahi Glass Company Ltd., and Shri Purnendu Narain Roy, director of Indo Asahi Glass Company Limited, is against the judgment and order dated July 18, 1996, in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 2003

Rani Sati Devi Trust Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-03-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 - Section 88

Reported in : (2003)185CTR(Cal)320,[2003]263ITR93(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Mullick and ;J.C. Saha, Advs.

Girish Chandra Gupta, J.1. The subject matter of challenge in this writ petition is the determination of amount payable by the petitioner under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998, and a clarification dated January 5, 1999,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2003

Netai Chandra Rarhi and Co. and ors., Vs. Income-tax Settlement Commis ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-25-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 154, 234A, 234B, 234C, 245D, 245D(4) and 245D(6)

Reported in : (2004)186CTR(Cal)706,[2003]263ITR186(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : D.K. Shome, ;J.C. Saha and ;Nizamuddin, Advs.

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J.1. In all these applications the same question of law being involved, those were heard analogously.2. By these writ applications the petitioners have prayed for cancellation of orders dated March 20, 2002, passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial