Advanced Search Results

Jagat NaraIn Dwivedi Vs. District Inspector of Schools, Pratapgarh and ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Education Act, 1921 - Sections 16E, 16F and 16FF; Uttar Pradesh Education Regulations, 1921 - Regulation 3(1) and (2)

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC118; (1998)1UPLBEC181

Advocate for Respondent : I.B. Singh, ;Smt. Mathuri Singh, ;M.M. Srivastava, ;H.G.S. Parihar, ;Alok Mathur, ;S.K. Gaur and ;Pankaj Bajpai, Advs.

Mrs. Shobha Dikshit, J.1. The short question which falls for consideration in this writ petition is as to what is the relevant date for the purpose of determining inter se seniority amongst the teachers in the...

Shekhar Tewari and Others. Vs. State of U.P. and Others.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 121 ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 407 ;

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. I.B.Singh, Adv.

1. Heard Mr.Parmanand Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. I.B.Singh, Special Public Prosecutor. The petitioners have filed the present petition under section 407 Code of Criminal Procedure to transfer the proceedings of Sessions Trial...

Raman Ispat (P.) Ltd. Vs. U.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilElectricity

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1999 - Sections 24

Reported in : 2003(2)AWC1672

Advocate for Respondent : I.B. Singh, Adv.

N.K. Mehrotra, J.1. This is an appeal against the order dated 22.10.2002 passed by the U. P. Electricity Regulatory Commission under Section 24 of the U. P. Electricity Reforms Act, 1999 in Petition No. 7 of...

Shekhar Tewari Vs. the State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr. P.C) - Section 161, 313, 234, 235, 311; Evidence Act - Sections 65-A and 65-B(1), 165

Advocate for Respondent : Government, Adv; , Abhishekh Ranjan; I.B.Singh, Advs

1. Heard Mr. Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. I.B.Singh, learned Senior Advocate Special Public Prosecutor as well as Mr. Salil Srivastava, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2. 2. The petitioner has...

Major S.N.Tripathi ( as Per Electoral Roll) Vs. the Election Commissio ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Election

Advocate for Respondent : Sri I.B. Singh, Adv

1. Heard Major S. N. Tripathi, the petitioner who appeared in person and Sri I. B. Singh, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Amit Jaiswal, learned counsel for the opposite parties. The petitioner preferred this Election Petition...

Vipul Gupta (Dr.) Vs. State of U.P. Through Secretary, Medical Educati ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7A, 10, 28(5), 41, 42 and 45; Uttar Pradesh States Universities (Amendment) Act, 1978; Constitution of India - Articles 2, 14, 21, 38, 39, 41, 46 and 254(2)

Reported in : (2004)3UPLBEC3070

Advocate for Respondent : I.B. Singh, Adv. and ;SC

Devi Prasad Singh, J.1. Heard Shri PS. Baghel, Advocate, Shri Sandeep Dixit, Advocate, Shri R.R.Awasthi, Advocate and Shri Manish Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Shri I.B.Singh, learned Counsel for the respondents No. 4 and...

Manna Lal Gupta Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009CriLJ2659

ORDERNarayan Shukla, J.1. Heard Mr. Salil K. Srivastava, learned Counsel for the revisionist, Mr. Bireshwar Nath, learned Counsel for the C.B.I., and Mr. I.B. Singh, learned Counsel for the complainant.2. The revisionist has challenged the order...

Sri Madhukar Dwivedi Vs. State of U.P. Through Secretary (Appointments ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(1)AWC1044

U.K. dhaon, J.1. Heard Sri I.B.Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Asit Kumar Chaturvedi, leaned counsel for opposite parties 3 and 4. The learned Standing Counsel for opposite parties 1 and 2 and Sri R.K.Singh...

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Altaf HussaIn Alias Jumai and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotics Drug and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 8, 21, 25, 27A, 29, 52, 67 and 108; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25; Criminal Proceedure Code , 1973 - Sections 82, 83, 161, 227, 228, 397 and 401; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1850 - Sections 116; Customs Act - Sections 108

Reported in : 1998CriLJ2782

Advocate for Respondent : Amar Saran, ;G.S. Chaturvedi and ;Smith Gopal, Advs.

ORDERT.P. Garg, J.1. This criminal revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, filed by the Union of India through the Assistant Narcotics Commissioner, Central Bureau of Narcotics, Lucknow, is...

Moreshwar Savey and Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Law Amendment Act - Sections 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 11, 11(1), 145, 161, 169, 173(8), 190, 193, 226, 227, 228, 233, 234, 234(1), 397, 460 and 482; General Clauses Act 1897 - Sections 10 and 21; Delhi Special Police Establisment Act, 1946; Evidence Act - Sections 10; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 114, 120A, 120-B, 141, 147, 149, 153-A-B, 201, 295, 295-A, 297, 323, 332, 336, 337, 338, 342, 379, 391, 390, 392, 394, 395, 397, 406, 408, 409, 427 and 505; Ayodhya Act, 1993; Limitation Act 1908; Companies Act - Sections 630; Constitution of India - Article 216, 233 and 227

Reported in : 2001CriLJ1765

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Chaubey, Sr. Counsel, for C.B.I and ;Arun Sinha, ;A.K. Mittal, ;D. Satya Narain, ;Ravindra Pratap Singh, Govt. Advs.

ORDERJagdish Bhalla, J.1. All the above revisions are directed against the same order dated 9th September, 1997 passed by the Special Additional Sessions Judge (Ayodhya Prakaran), Lucknow for framing charges against the revisionists, therefore, they were...