Advanced Search Results

Kanhaiya Lal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302, 307 and 447

Reported in : RLW2005(3)Raj1797; 2005(3)WLC326

Advocate for Respondent : Nirmala Sharma, Public Prosecutor

V.K. Bali, J.1. The appellants Kanhaiya Lal, Laxman & Narain were tried for intentionally causing deaths of Jagdish and Dilsukh. The resultant trial culminated into the order of conviction and sentence dated 7.5.1998 passed by the...

R.S. Avtar Singh and Co. Vs. National Projects Construction Corporatio ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30

Reported in : 47(1992)DLT599; 1992(23)DRJ184

Usha Mehra, J. (1) Shri T.S. Murthy, the sole arbitrator was appointed to adjudicate the matter between M/s. R.S Avtar Singh and Co. v. M/s. National Projects Construction Corporation Ltd. He made and published his award...

Sudheer T. Vs. M.V. Susheela and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act - Sections 22; Appropriation Act; Motor Vehicles Act; General Clauses Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 363; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 18, Rule 15; Constitution of India - Articles 53(1), 77, 123, 154(1), 166, 166(3), 217(3), 311(2) and 361; Kerala Education Rules - Rules 3, 4, 4(4), 5, 5A, 6, 7, 8, 8(1), 10, 12, 14, 51A and 59

Reported in : 2009(3)KLJ369

Advocate for Respondent : C.P. Sudhakara Prasad, A.G. and; T.B. Hood, G.P.

K. Balakrishnan Nair, J.1. The point that arises for decision in this case, is the applicability of the principle 'he who decides must hear/he who hears must decide' to Governmental decisions. This Writ Appeal was referred...

Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Kerala Industrial Single Window Clearance Boards and Industrial Township Area Development Act, 1999 - Sections 2, 3, 4(1), 5, 5(2), 6, 7 and 10; Companies Act; Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 1, 1(2), 4, 166, 182 and 243C; Constitution (73rd Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution (74th Amendment) Act; Gujarat Industrial Development Act, 1962 - Sections 2 and 16; Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 - Sections 264A; Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1964; Gujarat Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 1993; Kerala Ground Water (Control and Regulation) Act, 2000; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 243A, 243G and 243Q

Reported in : 2008(1)KLJ218

Advocate for Respondent : M. Pathros Mathai, Sr. Adv.,; T.B. Hood, GP,; Saji Vargh

K.S. Radhakrishnan, Acting C.J.1. The cardinal question to be considered in these cases is whether the second respondent Panchayat has got jurisdiction either to issue or cancel the licence granted to the petitioner for setting up...

John Lukose Vs. District Registrar

Court : Kerala

Subject : Family

Acts : Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 16

Reported in : I(2008)DMC273; 2007(1)KLT247

Advocate for Respondent : T.B. Hood, Government Pleader

M. Ramachandran, J.1. Sri. Y. John Lukose, aged 40 years, and resident of Kundara, Kollam is the first appellant and the averments in the Memorandum show that the second appellant (Darly Lukose, aged 37 years) residing...

Smt. Vijaya Sivan vs Prince Paul John,

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K.S. Arunkumar, Mr. T.B. Hood

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. NITIN JAMDAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WA NO. 677...

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Gauri Shankar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 1999VAD(Delhi)905; 81(1999)DLT535; 1999(51)DRJ127; ILR1999Delhi417

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Rajiv Aggarwal, Adv.

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. Municipal Corporation of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as MCD for short) which is petitioner in the instant case has filed this writ petition against award dated 13.1.1995 passed by Industrial Tribunal No. 2...

Hotel Nataraj and Others Vs. Karnataka State Financial Corporation and ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Company

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(2), 32(6) and 36 - order 21 - order 34, Rule 5; State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 31 and 32

Reported in : [1991]71CompCas685(Kar)

Advocate for Respondent : S. Vijayashankar, Adv.

P.K. Shyamasundar, J. 1. These appeals arise under section 32(9) of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 (to be hereinafter called 'the Act'), and are directed against the order made by the learned District Judge, Belgaum,...

Dr M. Ismail Frauqui and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionProperty

Acts : Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act, 1993 - Sections 2, 3, 4(3), 6, 7(1), 7(2), 8 and 8(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 16, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 51A, 143(1), 226, 227, 300A, 356 and 367; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9; General Clauses Act - Sections 3(26)

Reported in : AIR1995SC605; JT1994(6)SC632; (1994)6SCC360; [1994]Supp5SCR1

Advocate for Respondent : D.P. Gupta, Solicitor General, ;M.K. Banerjee, Attorney General, ;A. Subhashini, ;P. Parameswaran, ;Pawan Bahl, and ;Navin Prakash, Adv.

J.S. Verma, J.We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.- Jonathan Swift1. Swami Vivekananda said -Religion is not in doctrines, in dogmas, nor in intellectual argumentation;...

Bloo Aqua Studio vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

W.P.C Nos.19643/2022 & others 1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 5TH ASHADHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 19643 OF 2022 PETITIONERS: 1 SHWAS HOMES...