Advanced Search Results

Kehar Singh and ors. Vs. State (Delhi Administration)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 21, 136 and 136(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 9(2), 9(4), 9(6), 36, 51, 57, 91, 161, 164, 164(2), 164(3), 173, 174, 193(2), 194, 233, 281, 313, 327, 327(1), 352, 354(3), 364, 391 and 463; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 107, 108 to 117, 120-A, 120-B, 147, 302, 307, 376, 376-A, 376-B, 376-C and 376-D; Commissions of Enquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3 and 6; Commissions of Enquiry (Amendment) Act, 1986; Commissions Inquiry (Amendment) Ordinance, 1986; Evidence Act - Sections 10, 145, 155, 155(3), 157 and 159

Reported in : AIR1988SC1883; 1988(36)BLJR633; 1989CriLJ1; JT1988(3)SC191; 1988(2)SCALE117; (1988)3SCC609; [1988]Supp2SCR24; MANU/SC/0241/1988

Advocate for Respondent : G. Ramaswamy, Additional Solicitor Genernal, ; S. Madhusudhan Rao, Sr. Adv. and ;

ORDER OF THE COURTSd/-(USHA MEHRA)REGISTRAR16. On the same day, the High Court passed another order under Section 194 of the Code designating Shri Mahesh Chandra, Additional Sessions Judge as the Judge to try the said case....

Mrs. Sarojini Ramaswami Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 61, 67, 70, 94, 118, 119, 121, 122(1), 124(4), 124(5), 136, 141, 218, 226, 317 and 365(1); Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968) - Sections 3, 4 and 6(1); Judges (Inquiry) Rules, 1969 - Rules 6, 9, 10(2) and 16; Parliamentary (Judges) Commission of Inquiry Act, 1988; Punjab Welfare Officer Recruitment and Conditions of Service Rules, 1952; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 5 and 25N; House of Comons (Redistribution of Seats) Act, 1979; Enquiry Rules, 1969; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1992SC2219; JT1992(5)SC1; 1992(2)SCALE257; (1992)4SCC506; [1992]Supp1SCR108

Advocate for Respondent : G. Ramaswami, Attorney General, ; D.N. Dwivedi, Addl. Solicitor Genral (N.P.), ;

ORDERJ.S. Verma, J.1. The person entitled to seek judicial review and the stage at which it is available against the findings of the Inquiry Committee constituted under Section 3(2) of the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 (hereinafter...

A.M.V. Jayaraman Vs. Murugan Bus Service and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 64B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 8, Rule 8

Reported in : AIR1983Mad210

Advocate for Respondent : G. Ramaswami, Adv. for ;K. Thirumalai and C.R. Krishnamurthi, Advs.

ORDER1. The revision relates to the grant of stage carriage permit on the route from Nagalur to Erode. The distance is 46 kms. There were six applicants before the Regional Transport Authority which at its hearing...

Karnataka Electricity Board, Bangalore Vs. Sandur Manganese and Iron O ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 24, 49(3 and 5) and 79; Electricity Supply (Amendment) Act, 1981; Electricity Supply Regulation, 1988 - Regulation 30.07 and 35; Electricity Board (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1976; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 59 to 61

Reported in : AIR1997Kant62; 1996(3)KarLJ1

Advocate for Respondent : M/s. G. Ramaswamy and ;A.N. Jayaram, Sr. Adv. for Vivek Choudhary and ;Smt. Shantha Kumari, Govt. Pleader

ORDERKrishna Moorthy, J.1. The Karnataka State Electricity Board is the Appellant. They have challenged the Judgement of the Single Judge in W.P. 1531/1991 whereby the demand for interest for the period 16-12-1981 to 31-3-1987 on belated...

intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Arif U. Patel

Court : Chennai

Subject : Narcotics

Reported in : 1995(76)ELT28(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri G. Ramaswamy, Sr. Adv.

ORDER1. Crl. O.P. No. 6552/94 is filed under Section 439 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for cancellation of the bail granted to the respondent. The respondent was arrested and remanded before...

Gurcharan Singh Vs. Raghbir Cycles Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CompanyArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 155 and 433

Reported in : [1995]82CompCas203(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : G. Ramaswamy,; Y.K. Jain, Senior Advs.,; Rajiv Dutta

V.K. Bali, J. 1. This order shall dispose of Company Application No. 46 of 1993 in Company Petition No. 134 of 1987, and Company Application No. 47 of 1993 in Company Petition No. 79 of 1987...

Alimenta S.A. Vs. National Agricultural Co-operative Marketing Federat ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 33

Reported in : AIR1987SC643; JT1987(1)SC177; 1987(1)SCALE29; (1987)1SCC615; [1987]1SCR957; 1987(1)LC437(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : G. Ramaswamy, Additional Solicitor General, ; V.P. Singh and ;

Murari Mohan Dutt, J.1. These two appeals by special leave-one preferred by the National Agricultural Co-operative Marketing Federation of India Ltd (for short 'NAFFD') and the other by Alimenta S.A. (for short 'Alimenta'), a Swiss Company-are...

State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. Meghji Pethraj Shah Charitable Trust and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11

Reported in : (1994)2GLR1247; JT1994(3)SC96; 1994(2)SCALE374; (1994)3SCC552; [1994]3SCR163; (1994)2UPLBEC1327

Advocate for Respondent : G. Ramaswamy, ; P. Chidambaram and ; R.F. Nariman, ;

B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. Leave granted.2. Meghji Pethraj Shah Medical College was established by the then Government of Saurashtra at Jamnagar in the year 1955. For establishing the college, Sri M.P. Shah 'donated' a sum of...

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Ashok Kacker

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1995Supp(1)SCC180

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. G. Ramaswamy

J.S. Verma and; A.S. Anand, JJ.1. Leave granted.2. Heard on merits.3. Shri G. Ramaswamy, learned counsel for the respondent does not support the Tribunal's order for the reasons given therein in view of the decisions of...

State of Tamil Nadu Vs. C. Vadiappan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937 - Sections 17-C and 54; Tamil Nadu Arrack (Supply by Wholesale) Rules, 1981 - Rules 5 and 6; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Administrative Law

Reported in : AIR1982Mad386

Advocate for Respondent : G. Ramaswami and ;R. Gandhi, Advs.

1. The respondent herein filed W. P. No. 6568 of 1981 praying for the issue of a Writ of certiorarified mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order, calling for the records relating to the...