Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: e p sawant · Page 1 of about 43 results (0.070 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 03 2001

Mohammad MazharuddIn S/O HabibuddIn Sidiqui Vs. State of Maharashtra a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-03-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Services (Conduct) Rules, 1967 - Rule 6

Reported in : 2002(3)BomCR300

Advocate for Respondent : E.P. Sawant, G.P., Adv. for respondent No. 1 and ;R.J. Ghute Patil, Adv. for respondent No. 2

Pratibha Upasani, J.1. Heard Shri Deshpande, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri E.P. Sawant, learned Government Pleader for respondent No. 1 and Shri Ghute Patil, learned Counsel for respondent No. 2.2. The petitioner is working as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2006

NitIn S/O Manga Shirsat Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-10-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 20, 20(2), 20(3), 20(5), 21, 21(1), 21(2), 21(4), 21(5) and 453; Constitution of India - Article 226; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Rules - Rule 3(3)

Reported in : 2006(4)ALLMR296; 2006(5)BomCR698; 2006(3)MhLj601

Advocate for Respondent : E.P. Sawant, Government Pleader for respondent No. 1, ;P.M. Shah, Sr. Counsel and ;Mukul Kulkarni, Adv. for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 and ;A.S. Sawant, Adv. for respondent Nos. 5 to 9, 16 to 19 in W.P.

N.V. Dabholkar, J.1. Both writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are clubbed together since common challenge and common question of law is raised by the two petitions. All three petitioners (one in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 2004

Sunil Shrirang Phad Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-25-2004

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 22, 44, 44(1), 44(3), 44(2), 44(3), 44(4), 325 and 325(1); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : 2005(4)BomCR442

Advocate for Respondent : E.P. Sawant, G.P. for respondents 1 to 3

Naik A.B., J.1. Heard Shri Raghuwanshi, Advocate instructed by Shri Bachate, Advocate for petitioner and Shri E.P. Sawant, Government Pleader for respondents 1, 2 and 3. Respondent No. 4 is the State Election Commission.Shri Kendre, Residence...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 31 1996

Baburao and Etc. Vs. the Collector, District Parbhani and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-31-1996

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 55; Constitution of India - Article 226; Maharashtra Municipalities (Conduct of Business) Rules, 1966 - Rule 34; Maharashtra Municipalities (Elections to Subjects Committees) Rules, 1966 - Rule 38; Maharashtra Municipalities (President Election) Rules, 1981- Rules 6 and 7; Municipal Councils (Co-option of Councillors) Rules, 1967 - Rule 7(4); Bombay Village Panchayat (Sarpanch and Upsarpanch) Election Rules, 1964

Reported in : AIR1997Bom49; (1996)98BOMLR567

Advocate for Respondent : E.P. Sawant, Asstt. Govt Pleader, ;S.C. Bora, ;V.J. Dixit, ;A.B. Naik, ;N.N. Shinde and ;S.B. Talekar, Adv.

ORDERChapalgaonkar, J.1. These writ petitions challenge proceedings of a special meeting of Parbhani Municipal Council held on 6-11-1995. The special meeting was called to consider vote of no confidence against President of the Council. 2. Shri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 1994

Karbhari Maruti Agawan and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-07-1994

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226 and 329; Maharashtra Specified Co-operative Societies Elections to Committees Rules, 1971 - Rules 4(1) and 6(2); Maharashtra Co-operatives Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 11, 22, 25A, 38, 144A(2) and 152A; Maharashtra Act, 1974; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 56-D

Reported in : AIR1994Bom304; 1995(1)BomCR596

Advocate for Respondent : E.P. Sawant, A.G.P. and ;S.B. Mhase, holding for ;V.D. Hon, Adv.

ORDERChapalgaonker, J. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Rule. Rule taken up for hearing forthwith by consent of the parties.2. Petitioners are the members of respondent No. 5 Co-operative Sugar Factory, which is a Specified Society...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 1993

Subhash S/O Fakirchand Agarwal and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-28-1993

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 91

Reported in : 1994(1)BomCR356

Advocate for Respondent : E.P. Sawant, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 3, ;V.D. Hon, Adv. for ;P.B. Shirsath, Adv. for respondent Nos. 5 to 9 and ;V.D. Hon, Adv. for respondent Nos. 10 to 17

N.P. Chapalgaonker, J.1. Elections to the Managing Committee of Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Society Ltd., Rahata (Taluka : Kopargaon, District : Ahmednagar) were scheduled to take place in the month of March, 1993. This Society is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 1994

Ramesh Rajaram Patil Vs. the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Divis ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-07-1994

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Maharashtra Specified Co-operative Societies election to Committees Rules, 1971 - Rules 16, 23(5), 26, 27, 56-X and 58(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1860 - Sections 73FF; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 7; Constitution of India - Article 173

Reported in : AIR1995Bom91; 1995(2)BomCR264; (1994)96BOMLR688

Advocate for Respondent : E.P. Sawant, A.G.P. and ;R.S. Parundekar and ;R.G. Jadhav, Advs.

ORDER1. Liberty to add State as a party. 2. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent. 3. Mr. E. P. Sawant, A.G.P. waives notices for respondents Nos. 1, 2 and 5, Mr. Jadhav for respondent No. 3...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2002

Smt. Ranjana W/O Babasaheb Sature @ Smt. Ranjana D/O Namdeo Bagul Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-28-2002

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2004)106BOMLR47

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. We have heard the arguments of the learned Counsel for the respective parties spread over two continuous days and perused the record from the Scrutiny Committee as well as the registers maintained by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2001

Marathwada Janta Vikas Parishad and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-07-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; States Reorganization Act, 1956 - Sections 108

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR217; 2001(4)BomCR126

Advocate for Respondent : C.J. Sawant, Sr. C., ;P. Janardhan, A.G. and ;E.P. Sawant, G.P. for Respondent No. 1, ;Pradeep Deshmukh, Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, ;J.T. Gilda, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. By this Public Interest Litigation, Marathwada Janta Vikas Parishad and a local agriculturist are challenging a major irrigation project undertaken by the State of Maharashtra and Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation known as 'Khadakpurna...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2000

Jayprakash S/O. Raosaheb Salunke and Others Vs. the State of Maharasht ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-03-2000

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesElection

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 73-1D(1) and 91; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 57-A(7)

Reported in : AIR2000Bom461; 2000(4)ALLMR177; 2000(3)BomCR306; (2001)4BOMLR164; 2000(3)MhLj714

Advocate for Respondent : E.P. Sawant, ;G.P., ;V.D. Salunke and ;Shah for Intervenors

ORDERB.H. Marlapalle, J.1. Heard Shri Hon, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Shri Sawant, learned Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, respondent No. 3 is present personally and has made the record available through the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial