Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: dy govt · Page 1 of about 706 results (0.092 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 07 2000

J.D. Suryavanshi Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-07-2000

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2000(4)MPHT81

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Chitnis, Dy. Govt. Adv.

ORDERS.P. Srivastava, J.1. Heard Shri A.K. Shrivastava, learned counsel for petitioner as well as Shri S.G. Chitnis, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State-respondents,2. Perused the record.3. The petitioner had been appointed as Additional Government Pleader and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1996

Madanlal Sharma Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-13-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 25, 26 and 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482; Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 34A and 49C

Reported in : 1997(2)MPLJ299

Advocate for Respondent : S.H. Sen, Dy. Govt. Adv. and ;A. Salim, Panel Lawyer

ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. Shri S. S. Garg with Ku. Rekha Shrivastava and Shri C. S. Ujjainia for the petitioner.Shri S. H. Sen, Dy. Govt. Advocate with Shri A. Salim, Panel Lawyer for the prosecution.The petitioner is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 1993

Manoj Kumar Bansal Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-12-1993

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226; Rajasthan Civil Services (Service Matters) Appellate Tribunal Act, 1976

Reported in : (1994)ILLJ1155Raj; 1993(2)WLC751

Advocate for Respondent : Sumitra Goyal, Dy. Govt. Adv.

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. It is indeed unfortunate that despite a clear verdict given by this Court as early as on October 7, 1991 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5368/90 Riyaz Ali v. State of Rajasthan...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 07 2003

Mukesh Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : May-07-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 27

Reported in : 2003(4)MPHT57(CG)

Advocate for Respondent : Sharmila Singhai, Dy. Govt. Adv.

L.C. Bhadoo, J.1. Accused/appellant Mukesh Sahu has preferred this criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal procedure being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 18-12-2000 passed by the learned First...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1996

Sadhvi Ritumbhara Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-24-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 173 and 207; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 153A

Reported in : 1997(1)MPLJ116

Advocate for Respondent : Girish Desai, Govt. Adv. assisted by ;S.H. Sen, Dy. Govt. Adv.

ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. Shri Umesh Maheshwari for the petitioner. Shri Girish Desai, Govt. Advocate assisted by Shri S. H. Sen, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State.This revision petition is being decided finally at this stage for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 1995

Ramanand Batole Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-06-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : 1996(0)MPLJ63

Advocate for Respondent : M.M. Qureshi, Dy. Govt. Adv.

Fakhruddin, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by appellant Ramanand against his conviction and sentence passed by Shri M. S. Qureshi, Additional Judge to the Court of Sessions Judge, Gwalior in S. T. No. 49/80, on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1996

Ramprasad Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-31-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376

Reported in : 1997(1)MPLJ111

Advocate for Respondent : S.H. Sen, Dy. Govt. Adv.

J.G. Chitre, J.1. Shri J. L. Jain appointed by Legal Aid Committee for the appellant. Shri S. H. Sen, Dy. Govt. Advocate for prosecution. Both of them have been heard. Evidence has been examined in view...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 2005

Smt. Pushpa and ors. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-28-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006(1)MPHT322

Advocate for Respondent : Samdarshi Tiwari, Dy. Govt. Adv.

ORDERA.K. Shrivastava, J.1. This petition was originally filed before the State Administrative Tribunal at Jabalpur on 27-7-1990. However, on account of abolition of the Tribunal, this petition has been received by this Court for its adjudication.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 1993

Vinod Kumar Bharti and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-06-1993

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1994Raj82; 1993(2)WLC715

Advocate for Respondent : C.R. Jakhar, Dy. Govt. Adv.

A.K. Mathur, J.1. All these writ petitions involve common questions of law and facts, therefore, they are disposed of by this common order.2. For the convenient disposal of these writ petitions, the facts given in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2003

Smt. Saraswatibai Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : May-07-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 309

Reported in : 2003(4)MPHT3(CG)

Advocate for Respondent : Sharmila Singhai, Dy. Govt. Adv.

L.C. Bhadoo, J. 1. Accused/appellant Saraswatibai has preferred this criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 23-7-2001 passed by the learned Seventh Additional Sessions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial