Advanced Search Results

Arbind Export Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Warner A. Bock K.G.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 33

Reported in : AIR1981Cal18

Advocate for Respondent : Dipak Basu, Adv.

ORDERSalil K. Roy Chowdhury, J.1. This is an application under Section 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, inter alia for determination of the existence, validity and scope of the arbitration agreement and a declaration that noarbitration...

Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. Vs. Banerjee and Banerjee and ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33

Reported in : (1990)2CALLT10(HC),94CWN359

Advocate for Respondent : A.C. Bhadra and ;Dipak Basu, Advs.

P.K. Majumdar, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the award dated 30th January, 1988 passed by Joint Arbitrators, K.K Mishra and S.P. Roy Chowdhury on several grounds mentioned in the petition.2. By a letter of intent dated...

Ashoka Restaurant and Bar and anr. Vs. General Manager, Metro Railways ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1998Cal90

Advocate for Respondent : Anindy Mitra, ;Dipak Basu and ;Milir Chakraborty, Advs.

ORDERSatyabrata Sinha, J. 1. The petitioners who are owners of a restaurant known as 'Ashoka Restaurant & Bar' and carry on bisiness at 3B, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Calcutta have filed this application, inter alia, for issuance...

Union of India Vs. Supriya Kumar Saha

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PRESENTHon'ble Justice Ashoke Kumar Dasadhikari A.P. NO. 296 OF 2007 UNION OF INDIA VS. SUPRIYA KUMAR SAHA For the Petitioner : Mr. P. S. Basu,...

Supriya Kumar Saha Vs. Union of India

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Original Side Present : The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Ashim Kumar Banerjee And The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Debangsu Basak A.P.O.No.329 of 2013 A.P.No.296 of 2007 SUPRIYA KUMAR SAHA versus UNION...

M/S. Raitani Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

AP No.663 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction M/S.RAITANI ENGINEERING WORKS PVT.LTD.Versus UNION OF INDIA BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 9th June, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Dipak Basu, Sr.Adv.Mr.Bijon...

M/S. Inland Construction Company Vs. Union of India

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 11(2, 5 and 6);; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 16 and 21;; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 20;; Indian Contract Act, 1882;; Evidence Act, 1872

Reported in : (2000)2CALLT374(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Bijan Majumdar, Adv.

The Court 1. This is an application for vacating and recalling the order passed by this Court on 17th June, 1991 in A.P. No, 117 of 1999 which is as follows :--'This is an application under...

Prasad Chandra Paul Vs. Sinha Multilevel Marketing Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

ORDER SHEET G.A.No.357 of 2014 APOT No.63 of 2014 AP No.46 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE PRASAD CHANDRA PAUL Versus SINHA MULTILEVEL MARKETING PVT.LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE...

Prateek Plastometals Pvt Ltd Vs. Satish Kumar Agarwal

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE ACO262014 APOT922014 CP1452012 PRATEEK PLASTOMETALS PVT LTD Versus SATISH KUMAR AGARWAL ACO272014 APOT942014 CP4752013 PRATEEK PLASTOMETALS PVT.LTD.Versus SUPERPACK INDUSTRIES ACO282014 APOT952014 CP1602012 PRATEEK...

Madras Forgings and Allied Industries (C.B.C.) Ltd. Vs. Suresh Chandra ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 to 141; ;Banking, Public Financial Institutions and Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Section 4

Reported in : [1992]73CompCas385(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Dipak Bose, Adv. for respondent No. 1 and ;Dipti Bose and ;M. Vidyadharan, Advs. for respondent No. 2

Sengupta, J. 1. Upon the petition of complaint filed by the opposite party,the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Eigth Court, Calcutta, directed issuanceof summons against the petitioners, one of whom is a public limited companyand the other its...