Advanced Search Results
Hemendra Rasiklal Ghia Vs. Subodh Mody
Mumbai
Oct-16-2008
Civil
Evidence Act - Sections 4, 5, 21, 33, 36, 66, 91, 92, 93 and 123; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 27; Stamp Act - Sections 36; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 89 - Order 7, Rule 14 - Order 8, Rules 1, 1A, 6G and 8A - Order 12, Rule 2 and 2A - Order 13, Rules 1, 3, 4, 4(1) and 6 - Order 18, Rules 2(4), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(3), 4(4), 4(5), 4(6), 4(7), 4(8), 17A, 18 and 19 - Order 19, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 26, Rules 4A, 16, 16A, 17 and 18; Constitution of India - Article 21; Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules - Rule 7
2008(6)ALLMR352; 2008(6)MhLj886
N.Y. Gupte, Adv. in W.P. No. 623 of 2005, ;S.G. Aney, Sr. Counsel and ;S.V. Mhatre, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 in W.P. No. 1902 of 2005, ;R.M. Patne, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 4 in W.P. No. 1902
Vijay C. Daga, J.1. The question presented in these cases require us to resolve two conflicting lines of precedents on the one hand, as the Court stress that 'it is necessary for Court to decide about...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.Y. Gupte and anr. Vs. High Court of Judicature at Bombay and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-24-2001
Constitution
Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 - Sections 7; Bombay Judicial Services Recruitment Rules, 1956 - Rule 5, 5(1) and 5(6); Constitution of India - Articles 233, 234, 236, 309 and 372
2002(3)BomCR707
Gulam Vahanvati, Adv. for respondent No. 1, ;A.A. Kumbhakoni, Adv. for respondent No. 28, ;Abhay Oka, Adv. for respondent No. 29 and ;R.M. Sawant, G.P., for respondent No. 53;M.P. Vashi, K.K.V. Kurup
H.L. Gokhale, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is concerning the appointment to the post of Principal Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, Mumbai. The petition seeks to challenge the High...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askila VipIn Pandya Vs. Smita Ambalal Patel
Mumbai
Oct-17-2000
Media and CommunicationContempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 12
2000(3)ALLMR27; 2001ALLMR(Cri)663; (2001)1BOMLR393; 2001CriLJ838
Smita Patel, the Caveatrix
ORDERD. G. Deshpande, J.1. Contemner is Smita Ambalal Patel, who is the defendant in this suit and who is fighting her own cases in person in the Courts, particularly in this Court.2. This matter was on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
ila VipIn Pandya Vs. Smita Ambalal Patel
Supreme Court of India
May-17-2007
PropertyCivil
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 12
AIR2007SC2404; 2008(3)BomCR482; (SCSuppl)2007(3)CHN164; 2007(6)MhLj618; 2007(7)SCALE331; (2007)6SCC750; 2007AIRSCW4274;
Smita Ambalal Patel, Party-in-Person
Harjit Singh Bedi, J1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the order dated 25th August, 2004 of the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in notice of motion No. 1207 of 2004 in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Kayum Mahomed HooseIn Pitalvala Vs. Ebrahim Abbasbhai Harianival ...
Mumbai
Feb-25-1959
Tenancy
Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 41, 46 and 47
(1959)61BOMLR1223
S.J. Sorabji, Adv. i/b., Jehangirand Seervai Attorneys
Gokhale, J. (1) This is an appeal by the original defendant against a decree passed in respondent's favour by the Bombay City Civil Court in Suit No. 1106 of 1956. The suit came to be filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLaxmidas N. Madhvani Vs. Madhvani Private Ltd.
Mumbai
Aug-23-1985
Civil
(1986)88BOMLR308
R.A. Jahagirdar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order dated September 24, 1979 passed by a Judge of the City Civil Court at Bombay returning the plaint in Suit No. 6769 of 1978. The suit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevi Ramchand Waswani Vs. S.V. Bastikar
Mumbai
Aug-20-1966
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 144 - Order 9, Rule 13
AIR1968Bom57; (1967)69BOMLR121; ILR1967Bom945; 1967MhLJ326
D.S. Parikh, ;R.P. Vyas and ;V.N. Golwala, Advs. (In No. 849 of 1966) and ;A.N. Mirchandani, Adv.
(1) These two matters arise out of an order passed by the Judge of the City Civil Court upon a Notice of Motion being taken out before him to set aside an ex parte decree. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLaxman Pandu and ors. Vs. Chief Mechanical Engineer, Western Railway
Mumbai
Oct-01-1954
Labour and Industrial
Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 3, 5, 15, 15(3), 15(4), 16(2), 16(3), 17 and 17(1); Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1955Bom283; (1955)57BOMLR399; (1955)IILLJ5Bom
M.M. Majumdar and ;D.S. Parikh, Advs.
ORDER1. A rather important question arises on this civil revision application as to the right of appeal by an employer under Section 17 of the Payment of Wages Act. It appears that a joint application of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManmohan Muttappa Attavar, Vs. Harendra Sakarlal Parikh,
Mumbai
Mar-25-2003
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 15 to 20 - Order 7, Rule 11; Court Fees Act - Sections 7; Suits Valuation Act- Sections 9
2003(3)ALLMR98; 2003(6)BomCR423
D.S. Parikh, Adv., i/b., S.S. Balsari, Adv.
R.G. Deshpande, J.1. The order dated September 18, 1996 passed in Short Cause Suit No. 4419 of 1993 by the 2nd Additional Principal Judge, city Civil Court, Bombay is the subject matter of challenge in this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssociation of Commerce House Block Owners Ltd. Vs. Vishandas Samaldas ...
Mumbai
Dec-08-1980
Civil
Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 - Sections 4, 7 and 7(1); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 56; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 23 to 26, 28 to 31 and 32
(1981)83BOMLR339
D.S. Parikh and ;Sheela S. Balsara, Advs. for respondent No. 1
M.N. Chandurkar, J.1. This Letters Patent appeal filed by defendant No. 1 arises out of a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 31st October, 1964 in respect of certain property, the identity of which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »