Advanced Search Results

SumikIn Bussan International Vs. Manharlal T. Mody and

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 64 and 64(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : 2004(4)BomCR860; 2004(4)MhLj919

Advocate for Respondent : Virag Tulzapurkar and ;A.S. Doctor, Advs., i/b., Kanga and Co.

ORDERAnoop V. Mohta, J.1. The applicants, in this Chamber Summons, being third persons to the Judgment and Decree dated, 31st May, 2002, prayed that the warrant of attachment, dated 12th January, 2004, issued in respect of...

Rajiv K. Mehta Vs. Rekha H. Sheth and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Dwarkardas, Mr. Sancheti

1. By consent of parties, both these notice of motions were heard together and are being disposed of by a common order. 2. Notice of Motion No.368 of 2011 is filed by defendant no.1 inter alia...

Nircon Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Zohrabai FakhruddIn and Oth ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 15, 20 and 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269-UC and UL, 276, 277 and 296-UC - Rule 48(K and L); Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966

Reported in : 1998(2)ALLMR246; 1998(1)BomCR153

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Kadam and ;A. Gadkari, Milind Vasudeo and ;Shiralkar, advs., i/b Shiralkar & Co., ;D.D. Madan and ;Rahul Narichania, i/b Gagrat & Co., ;Ms. Anita Castelina, i/b Pandya & Co., ;J

ORDERS.S. Nijjar, J.1. This suit has been filed by the plaintiffs making a number of prayers. A declaration is sought to the effect that there is a valid and subsisting agreement for sale and development between...

In Re: C.J. Gelatine Products Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Sick Industrial Units Act; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 434; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 16, 17, 17(3), 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 22(1), 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34

Reported in : [1994]81CompCas890(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Madan, Adv.

S.M. Jhunjhunuwala, J.1. C.J. Gelatine Products Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the company') has been incorporated and registered under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'), having its registered...

Commissioner of Customs (Gen) Vs. Raj Clearing Agency

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004 - Regulations 10, 20(1), 20(2), 22 and 22(1)

Reported in : 2006(199)ELT602(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Madan, Sr. Adv., ;S.N. Kantawala, ;H.N. Thakore and ;Agnes Baradia, Advs., i/b., ;Thakore Jariwala and Associates

1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. This is an appeal filed by the Appellant-Commissioner of Customs raising the question of law with regard to the judgment and order of CESTAT dated 12th December, 2005....

In Re: Karam Chand Thapar and Bros. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 16, 22(1) and 25; Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : 1992(3)BomCR14

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Madan and ; D.M. Tavawalla, Advs., i/b., MMCB & Caroe

S.M. Jhunjhunuwala, J.1. C.J. Gelatine Products Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ''the Company') has been incorporated and registered under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act') having its registered...

Hariprasad G. Trivedi Vs. Yeshwant K. Abhyankar and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 - Sections 11(1); Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1-A) and 15-B(1); Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act as Amended in 1997; Maharashtra Act, 1997; Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) (Amendment) Act, 1996; Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 - Sections 8-C, 9

Reported in : 1998(1)BomCR403; 1997(3)MhLj402

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Madan and ;Abhay Patki, Advs.

ORDER1. Rule issued on 17th June, 1997 is, by consent, made returnable forthwith.Heard parties.2. Facts giving rise to the present petition, are as follows:Premises which are the subject matter of controversy in the present petition, are...

Harsud Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd., Kandhwa, M.P. and Another ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CompanyInsurance

Acts : Insurance Act, 1938; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 44; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10, 17 and 73; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3

Reported in : 1993ACJ899; AIR1992Bom341; 1992(1)BomCR5; [1994]80CompCas834(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Madan i/by;M/s. Mulla &;Mulla &;Craigie Blunt &;Caroe, Adv.

ORDER1. This is an action for recovery of compensation on the basis of a contract of insurance against the risk of damage by fire.2. The pre-nationalisation Vulcan Insurance Co. (Vulcan) was in the business of general...

Mahendra Jayantilal Vora and ors. Vs. Aditya Enterprises and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilContract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 11, Rule 1 - Order 1, Rule 10 and 10(2)

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR209; 2006(2)BomCR251

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Madan, Sr. Counsel, ;Cyrus Ardeshir, Adv., i/b., ;Kanga and Co.

Lodha R.M., J.1. The appellants are original plaintiffs in the suit filed by them for declaration that the agreement dated 26th August, 2002 has been legally and validly terminated by the plaintiffs with effect from 10th...

Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Khatau Makanji Spg. and Wvg. Co. Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and IndustrialContempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 12(5)

Reported in : 1997(4)ALLMR684

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Madan, ;T.K. Cooper,; Virag Tulzapurkar, ;Rahul Chitnis and ;Vibha Salvi, Advs.

1. On May 6, 1997, this Court while modifying the earlier order dated May 5, 1997 directed Khatau Makanji Spg. & Wvg. Co. Ltd. ('the company') to make payment of salary of its workers for February...