Advanced Search Results
Pranita Powerloom Coop. Soc. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-15-2009
Trusts and Societies
Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 5A, 6, 6(1), 37 and 39; Land Acquisition Rules; Land Acquisition (Company Rules), 1963 - Rule 4(3); Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 20 and 125
2009(4)BomCR152; JT2009(6)SC242; 2009(6)SCALE209; (2009)12SCC652; 2009(5)LC2424(SC):2009AIRSCW3445:2009(5)LHSC2947
Jaideep Gupta, ; A. Mariamputham, Sr. Advs., ; Shivaji M. Jad
V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of SLP (C) No. 12077/07, as also SLP(C) No. 11250/08, SLP(C) No. 11345-11346/08, SLP(C) No. 11357/08, SLP(C) No. 23332-23333/08, SLP(C) No. 23335/08 and SLP(C) No. 20656/08.2. Leave granted in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs (P) Vs. Jayantilal Ambalal Chokshi (P) Ltd. an ...
Mumbai
Apr-25-2003
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108, 112, 121, 129A, 130, 130(1) and 130(3)
2003(5)BomCR54; 2004(163)ELT13(Bom)
D. Chavan and ;S. Kenalkar, Advs., i/b., H. Mehta, Adv.
J.P. Devadhar, J.1. The Commissioner of Customs (P), Mumbai has filed this application under Section 130(3) of the Customs Act, 1962 against the order of CEGAT, Bombay dismissing the Reference Application filed by the Commissioner under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.S.M. Arshad Vs. Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Seco ...
Mumbai
Apr-03-2006
Contract
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 32, 226 and 298
2006(4)ALLMR233; 2006(4)BomCR185; 2006(3)MhLj654
D. Chavan, Adv.
V.G. Palshikar, J.1. By this petition, the Petitioner has made the following prayers:(a) For a Writ of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, direction or order in the nature thereof under Article 226 of the Constitution...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
i.V.R. Construction Limited Vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Board an ...
Mumbai
Aug-12-1998
Commercial
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2
1998(4)BomCR502
C.J. Sawant, A.G., ;Ms. D. Chavan, Adv., i/b Little & Co., ;D.H. Mehta and ;G. Joshi, Advs., i/b Desai & Diwanji
ORDERDr. B.P. Saraf, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the affidavit and minutes of the Board meeting. Also considered the report of the Committee of respondent No, 1 by which (he petitioner's case was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShriniwas Raghvendra Javalgekar Vs. the Bank of Maharashtra and anr.
Mumbai
Apr-25-1994
CivilContract
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 74; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34
1994(4)BomCR139
N.N. Kapadia and ;G.D. Chavan, Advs.
A.A. Halbe, J.1. These appeals are taken up together as they raise common question relating to the propriety of the observations of the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Union Bank v. Dalpat...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrabhubhai Ranchhodbhai Tailor Vs. Bhartiben Prabhubhai Tailor
Mumbai
Feb-28-2003
Family
Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 18
2004(3)ALLMR571; 2003(5)BomCR190
Harshad Pathak, Adv.
J.P. Devadhar, J.1. In this Family Court appeal, the appellant (husband) challenges the judgment and order dated 9th July, 2000 passed by the learned Judge of the Family Court at Bandra wherein permanent alimony of Rs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.D. Chavan (Dr.) Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-17-2002
Civil
Constitution of India - Article 226
2002(5)BomCR29
R.D. Rane, A.G.P. and ;R.D. Soni, Adv. and ;Peter Lobo, Adv. for respondent No. 4.
V.G. Palshikar, J.1. By this petition the petitioner Dr. V.D. Chavan has challenged the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal on 4th May, 2001, allowing the petition of respondent No. 4 herein, quashing the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrabhubhai Ranchhodbhai Tailor Vs. Mrs. Bhartiben Prabhubhai Tailor
Mumbai
Feb-28-2003
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 11 and 25
2004(3)MhLj487
Harsad Pathak, Adv.
J.P. Devadhar, J.1. In this Family Court Appeal, the Appellant (husband) challenges the Judgment and order dated 9th July, 2000 passed by the learned Judge of the Family Court at Bandra wherein permanent alimony of Rs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShivaji @ Shivling Nagendra Gatade Vs. The State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-07-2014
Land Acquisition
A.S. Gadkari, J. 1. The appellant, original accused, has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and order dated 17th March 2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jaisingpur, DistrictKolhapur in Sessions Case No. 3...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDinkar Bapurao Deokar, since deceased through Legal heirs Asha Dinkar ...
Mumbai
Dec-01-2015
Criminal
Oral Judgment: 1. This Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 6th September 2005 passed by the Special Judge (appointed under section 3 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988), Satara, convicting the appellant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »