Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: d chavan · Page 1 of about 11 results (0.065 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 15 2009

Pranita Powerloom Coop. Soc. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-15-2009

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 5A, 6, 6(1), 37 and 39; Land Acquisition Rules; Land Acquisition (Company Rules), 1963 - Rule 4(3); Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 20 and 125

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR152; JT2009(6)SC242; 2009(6)SCALE209; (2009)12SCC652; 2009(5)LC2424(SC):2009AIRSCW3445:2009(5)LHSC2947

Advocate for Respondent : Jaideep Gupta, ; A. Mariamputham, Sr. Advs., ; Shivaji M. Jad

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of SLP (C) No. 12077/07, as also SLP(C) No. 11250/08, SLP(C) No. 11345-11346/08, SLP(C) No. 11357/08, SLP(C) No. 23332-23333/08, SLP(C) No. 23335/08 and SLP(C) No. 20656/08.2. Leave granted in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2003

Commissioner of Customs (P) Vs. Jayantilal Ambalal Chokshi (P) Ltd. an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-25-2003

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108, 112, 121, 129A, 130, 130(1) and 130(3)

Reported in : 2003(5)BomCR54; 2004(163)ELT13(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : D. Chavan and ;S. Kenalkar, Advs., i/b., H. Mehta, Adv.

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. The Commissioner of Customs (P), Mumbai has filed this application under Section 130(3) of the Customs Act, 1962 against the order of CEGAT, Bombay dismissing the Reference Application filed by the Commissioner under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2006

S.S.M. Arshad Vs. Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Seco ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-03-2006

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 32, 226 and 298

Reported in : 2006(4)ALLMR233; 2006(4)BomCR185; 2006(3)MhLj654

Advocate for Respondent : D. Chavan, Adv.

V.G. Palshikar, J.1. By this petition, the Petitioner has made the following prayers:(a) For a Writ of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, direction or order in the nature thereof under Article 226 of the Constitution...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 12 1998

i.V.R. Construction Limited Vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Board an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-12-1998

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 1998(4)BomCR502

Advocate for Respondent : C.J. Sawant, A.G., ;Ms. D. Chavan, Adv., i/b Little & Co., ;D.H. Mehta and ;G. Joshi, Advs., i/b Desai & Diwanji

ORDERDr. B.P. Saraf, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the affidavit and minutes of the Board meeting. Also considered the report of the Committee of respondent No, 1 by which (he petitioner's case was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 1994

Shriniwas Raghvendra Javalgekar Vs. the Bank of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-25-1994

Subject : CivilContract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 74; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34

Reported in : 1994(4)BomCR139

Advocate for Respondent : N.N. Kapadia and ;G.D. Chavan, Advs.

A.A. Halbe, J.1. These appeals are taken up together as they raise common question relating to the propriety of the observations of the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Union Bank v. Dalpat...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2003

Prabhubhai Ranchhodbhai Tailor Vs. Bhartiben Prabhubhai Tailor

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-28-2003

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 18

Reported in : 2004(3)ALLMR571; 2003(5)BomCR190

Advocate for Respondent : Harshad Pathak, Adv.

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. In this Family Court appeal, the appellant (husband) challenges the judgment and order dated 9th July, 2000 passed by the learned Judge of the Family Court at Bandra wherein permanent alimony of Rs....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2002

V.D. Chavan (Dr.) Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-17-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(5)BomCR29

Advocate for Respondent : R.D. Rane, A.G.P. and ;R.D. Soni, Adv. and ;Peter Lobo, Adv. for respondent No. 4.

V.G. Palshikar, J.1. By this petition the petitioner Dr. V.D. Chavan has challenged the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal on 4th May, 2001, allowing the petition of respondent No. 4 herein, quashing the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2003

Prabhubhai Ranchhodbhai Tailor Vs. Mrs. Bhartiben Prabhubhai Tailor

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-28-2003

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 11 and 25

Reported in : 2004(3)MhLj487

Advocate for Respondent : Harsad Pathak, Adv.

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. In this Family Court Appeal, the Appellant (husband) challenges the Judgment and order dated 9th July, 2000 passed by the learned Judge of the Family Court at Bandra wherein permanent alimony of Rs....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2014

Shivaji @ Shivling Nagendra Gatade Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-07-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

A.S. Gadkari, J. 1. The appellant, original accused, has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and order dated 17th March 2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jaisingpur, DistrictKolhapur in Sessions Case No. 3...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 2015

Dinkar Bapurao Deokar, since deceased through Legal heirs Asha Dinkar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-01-2015

Subject : Criminal

Oral Judgment: 1. This Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 6th September 2005 passed by the Special Judge (appointed under section 3 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988), Satara, convicting the appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial