Advanced Search Results
Shivappa S/O Bhujangappa Bembale Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.
Mumbai
Apr-07-2005
Service
Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 - Rules 30, 57 and 110
2005(6)BomCR437; 2005(3)MhLj709
U.K. Patil, AGP for respondent No. 1 and ;C.V. Thombre, Adv. for respondent No. 2
P.B. Gaikwad, J.1. Petitioner Shivappa s/o Bhujangappa Bembale has filed present Writ Petition against Zilla Parishad through its Chief Executive Officer and requested for direction to regularise his services as a Peon w.e.f. 24-7-1970; further direction...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaosaheb S/O Babasaheb Kakade Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
Sep-21-1998
Civil
Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Sections 39; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samities Act, 1961 - Sections 111(13) and 119(1)
1999(3)ALLMR194; 1999(3)BomCR25; 1999(2)MhLj367
K.B. Chaudhari, A.G.P., ;H.K. Mundhe and ;C.V. Thombre, Advs.
ORDERN.P. Chapalgaonker, J. 1. Heard. 2. Rule. Taken up forthwith for hearing by consent. 3. An action was initiated to remove the respondent No, 3 Sahebrao Bajirao Amte, Sarpanch of the Village Panchayat Bedarwadi, Tq. Patoda,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRama S/O Kondiba Khade Vs. Sk. Sakir S/O Sk. Kachru and anr.
Mumbai
Feb-28-2003
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140; Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Rules 1989 - Rule 260(3)
2004ACJ1370; 2004(1)MhLj971
C.V. Thombre, Adv. for respondent No. 1 and ;S.K. Naikwade, Adv. for respondent No. 2
D. S. Zoting, J.1. Heard Mr. R.M. Borde, learned Counsel for the appellant. Mr. C.V. Thombre, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 and Mr. S.K. Naikwade, learned Counsel, for respondent No. 2.2. Admit.With consent of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ramdas Shriram Chaudhari Vs. Guna Kondu Dhanger,
Mumbai
Apr-10-2003
Limitation
Limitation Act - Schedule - Articles 64 and 135
2004(2)ALLMR518
Arun D. Kulkarni, Adv. holding for ;C.V. Thombre, learned counsel
D.S. Zoting, J.1. Heard Mr. V. B. Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Arun D. Kulkarni, advocate, holding for Mr. C.V. Thombre, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Rule, returnable forthwith, by consent of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Vs. Vimlabai and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-04-2006
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 307 and 498A
2006CriLJ3118; I(2007)DMC157
C.V. Thombre, Adv.
P.S. Brahme, J.1. Heard Mr. U. K. Patil, A.P.P. for the appellant-State & Mr. C.V. Thombre, advocate for Respondents.2. This Criminal Appeal is against the judgment and order, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhau Shankarrao Suradkar and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and Othe ...
Mumbai
Jun-11-1998
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 295-A
2000(5)BomCR116; 1999CriLJ1230
Smt. Geeta Deshpande, A.P.P.
ORDERV. K. BARDE, J.1. Heard Shri C.V. Thombre, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Smt. Geeta Deshpande, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 2. The petitioners have contended that the photographs of God and Goddesses of Hindu religion...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovindrao Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
Jan-08-2014
Education
Oral Judgment: 1. Heard Mr. S.W. Munde, the learned Counsel for the appellant. Heard Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, for the respondent no.1. Heard Mr. C.V. Thombre, the learned Counsel for the respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovindrao Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai Aurangabad
Jan-08-2014
Education
Oral Judgment: 1. Heard Mr. S.W. Munde, the learned Counsel for the appellant. Heard Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, for the respondent no.1. Heard Mr. C.V. Thombre, the learned Counsel for the respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBapu and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai Aurangabad
Sep-22-2015
Criminal
S.S. Shinde, J. 1. Criminal Appeal No.596/2011 is filed by the original accused and Criminal Appeal No.437/2014 is filed by the original complainant, praying for enhancement of the sentence. Since both these Criminal Appeals are arising...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRama Vs. Sk. Sakir and anr.
Mumbai
Feb-28-2003
InsuranceMotor Vehicles
I(2005)ACC508
Mr. C.V. Thombre
D.S. Zoting, J.1. Heard Mr. R.M. Borde, learned Counsel for the appellant. Mr. C.V. Thombre, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 and Mr. S.K. Naikwade, the learned Counsel for respondent No. 2.2. Admit. With consent of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »