Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: c v thombre · Page 1 of about 12 results (0.078 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 07 2005

Shivappa S/O Bhujangappa Bembale Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-07-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 - Rules 30, 57 and 110

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR437; 2005(3)MhLj709

Advocate for Respondent : U.K. Patil, AGP for respondent No. 1 and ;C.V. Thombre, Adv. for respondent No. 2

P.B. Gaikwad, J.1. Petitioner Shivappa s/o Bhujangappa Bembale has filed present Writ Petition against Zilla Parishad through its Chief Executive Officer and requested for direction to regularise his services as a Peon w.e.f. 24-7-1970; further direction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1998

Raosaheb S/O Babasaheb Kakade Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-21-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Sections 39; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samities Act, 1961 - Sections 111(13) and 119(1)

Reported in : 1999(3)ALLMR194; 1999(3)BomCR25; 1999(2)MhLj367

Advocate for Respondent : K.B. Chaudhari, A.G.P., ;H.K. Mundhe and ;C.V. Thombre, Advs.

ORDERN.P. Chapalgaonker, J. 1. Heard. 2. Rule. Taken up forthwith for hearing by consent. 3. An action was initiated to remove the respondent No, 3 Sahebrao Bajirao Amte, Sarpanch of the Village Panchayat Bedarwadi, Tq. Patoda,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2003

Rama S/O Kondiba Khade Vs. Sk. Sakir S/O Sk. Kachru and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-28-2003

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140; Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Rules 1989 - Rule 260(3)

Reported in : 2004ACJ1370; 2004(1)MhLj971

Advocate for Respondent : C.V. Thombre, Adv. for respondent No. 1 and ;S.K. Naikwade, Adv. for respondent No. 2

D. S. Zoting, J.1. Heard Mr. R.M. Borde, learned Counsel for the appellant. Mr. C.V. Thombre, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 and Mr. S.K. Naikwade, learned Counsel, for respondent No. 2.2. Admit.With consent of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 10 2003

Ramdas Shriram Chaudhari Vs. Guna Kondu Dhanger,

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-10-2003

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act - Schedule - Articles 64 and 135

Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR518

Advocate for Respondent : Arun D. Kulkarni, Adv. holding for ;C.V. Thombre, learned counsel

D.S. Zoting, J.1. Heard Mr. V. B. Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Arun D. Kulkarni, advocate, holding for Mr. C.V. Thombre, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Rule, returnable forthwith, by consent of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2006

State of Maharashtra Vs. Vimlabai and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-04-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 307 and 498A

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3118; I(2007)DMC157

Advocate for Respondent : C.V. Thombre, Adv.

P.S. Brahme, J.1. Heard Mr. U. K. Patil, A.P.P. for the appellant-State & Mr. C.V. Thombre, advocate for Respondents.2. This Criminal Appeal is against the judgment and order, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 11 1998

Bhau Shankarrao Suradkar and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and Othe ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-11-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 295-A

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR116; 1999CriLJ1230

Advocate for Respondent : Smt. Geeta Deshpande, A.P.P.

ORDERV. K. BARDE, J.1. Heard Shri C.V. Thombre, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Smt. Geeta Deshpande, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 2. The petitioners have contended that the photographs of God and Goddesses of Hindu religion...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2014

Govindrao Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-08-2014

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: 1. Heard Mr. S.W. Munde, the learned Counsel for the appellant. Heard Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, for the respondent no.1. Heard Mr. C.V. Thombre, the learned Counsel for the respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2014

Govindrao Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Jan-08-2014

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: 1. Heard Mr. S.W. Munde, the learned Counsel for the appellant. Heard Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, for the respondent no.1. Heard Mr. C.V. Thombre, the learned Counsel for the respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 2015

Bapu and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Sep-22-2015

Subject : Criminal

S.S. Shinde, J. 1. Criminal Appeal No.596/2011 is filed by the original accused and Criminal Appeal No.437/2014 is filed by the original complainant, praying for enhancement of the sentence. Since both these Criminal Appeals are arising...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2003

Rama Vs. Sk. Sakir and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-28-2003

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(2005)ACC508

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. C.V. Thombre

D.S. Zoting, J.1. Heard Mr. R.M. Borde, learned Counsel for the appellant. Mr. C.V. Thombre, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 and Mr. S.K. Naikwade, the learned Counsel for respondent No. 2.2. Admit. With consent of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial