Skip to content


Bhau Shankarrao Suradkar and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Subject

Criminal

Court

Mumbai High Court

Decided On

Case Number

Criminal Writ Petition No. 365 of 1997

Judge

Reported in

2000(5)BomCR116; 1999CriLJ1230

Acts

Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 295-A

Appellant

Bhau Shankarrao Suradkar and Another

Respondent

State of Maharashtra and Others

Appellant Advocate

C. V. Thombre, Adv.

Respondent Advocate

Smt. Geeta Deshpande, A.P.P.

Excerpt:


.....may arrest a person without intervention of the court subject to the limitations specified under the provisions of the code. the provisions of section 41 of the code provides for arrest by a police officer without an order from a magistrate and without a warrant. a distinct and different power under section 44 of the code empowers the magistrate to arrest or order any person to arrest the offender. under section 44 of the code, that power is vested in the court of the magistrate when an offence is committed in his presence. if the legislature has taken care of providing such specific power under section 44 of the code, then there could be no reason for such a power not to be specified under the provisions of chapter xii of the code. in terms of section 41, a police officer may arrest a person without a warrant or order from the magistrate for any or all of the conditions specified in that provision. language of this provision clearly suggested that the police officer can arrest a person without an order from the magistrate. thus, there appears to be no reason why on the strength of section 156(3) of the code, any restriction should be read into the power specifically..........the fire crackers are fired, those photographs are destroyed and this causes mental agony to the persons from hindu community and,therefore, the manufacturers of the fire crackers be directed not to affix photographs of god and goddesses of hindu religion on the fire crackers.3. it is a fact that photographs of god and goddesses of hindu religion are being pasted on the fire crackers. this is not happening for the first time, but this practice is going on since last many years and up-till-now nobody has raised any objection regarding this practice. that has happened only because nobody thought it objectionable, nobody's feeling were hurt on seeing the firecrackers bursting and the photographs destroying because the photographs on the fire crackers were not being looked at as photographs of god and goddesses but just some prints to attract the attention of the customers. there was no intention that anybody's feeling should be hurt by selling such fire crackers or by bursting such fire crackers. now altogether new dimension is being given to this matter. nobody from hindu community up-till-now has thought over on this issue in this way. it is just whim of the petitioners and for.....

Judgment:


ORDER

V. K. BARDE, J.

1. Heard Shri C.V. Thombre, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Smt. Geeta Deshpande, learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

2. The petitioners have contended that the photographs of God and Goddesses of Hindu religion are being printed on the coverings of the fire crackers and when the fire crackers are fired, those photographs are destroyed and this causes mental agony to the persons from Hindu community and,therefore, the manufacturers of the fire crackers be directed not to affix photographs of God and Goddesses of Hindu religion on the fire crackers.

3. It is a fact that photographs of God and Goddesses of Hindu religion are being pasted on the fire crackers. This is not happening for the first time, but this practice is going on since last many years and up-till-now nobody has raised any objection regarding this practice. That has happened only because nobody thought it objectionable, nobody's feeling were hurt on seeing the firecrackers bursting and the photographs destroying because the photographs on the fire crackers were not being looked at as photographs of God and Goddesses but just some prints to attract the attention of the customers. There was no intention that anybody's feeling should be hurt by selling such fire crackers or by bursting such fire crackers. Now altogether new dimension is being given to this matter. Nobody from Hindu community up-till-now has thought over on this issue in this way. It is just whim of the petitioners and for that they have come before the Court. This is nothing but wasting time, money and energy.

4. Photographs of God and Goddesses, and for that matter, other respectable National Leaders, are being printed everyday in different newspapers and everybody knows that the life of the newspaper is hardly for 24 hours and thereafter it becomes waste paper and those photographs on the newspapers go to the dustbin in majority of the cases without anybody considering that there are photographs of God and Goddesses of Hindu religion or photographs of National Leaders because the matter is never looked at from that point of view.

5. Whenever invitation cards of marriages or other ceremonies being performed by Hindu persons, photographs of God and Goddesses are printed on these invitation cards and once the purpose of the cards is finished, those cards also go to the dustbins, with them the photographs printed on them. Here also nobody's feelings are hurt by saying that the photographs of God and Goddesses are being thrown in dustbins along with other rubbish matters.

6. If the analogy which is being applied by the petitioners for the photographs which are being affixed on the fire crackers is to be applied to all the photographs which are being printed in the newspapers and invitation cards as mentioned above, such printing will have to be stopped and that is nothing but impracticable illogical approach to the matter.

7. If anybody from the petitioners feels that by bursting the fire crackers on which there are photographs of God and Goddesses, he may stop himself using such fire crackers for his own purposes because only his feelings are being hurt, but he should not take the matter in his hands as if he is representing whole of the society when whole of the society is not looking to the matter from that point of view.

8. The petitioners here should have utilised their time, money and energy for some constructive social work which would have helped the society at large. For filing such frivolous writ petition, we actually intend to impose heavy costs on the petitioners. However, the learned Counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners have taken hint from this matter and they would not indulge in such activities henceforth.

9. Hence, the writ petition is being dismissed in limine.

Writ petition dismissed.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //