Advanced Search Results
Chairman and M.D. Indian Overseas Bank and ors Vs. Tribhuwan Nath Sriv ...
Supreme Court of India
Feb-04-2011
Land Acquisition
1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated September 3, 2003 passed by a division bench of the Allahabad High Court on a writ petition (Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No.6162...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEngineering and Metal Workers Union Vs. Commissioner of Labour and ors ...
Mumbai
Jan-24-2003
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25O and 39(2)
2003(2)ALLMR528; 2003(4)BomCR804; (2003)IILLJ598Bom
R.M. Sawant and ;M.D. Naik, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, ;C.U. Singh, ;Mahendra Ghelani and Helanie D'Souza, Advs., i/b., ;Law Charter for Respondent No. 4
D.B. Bhosale, J. 1. The short question that arises for consideration in this writ petition is whether respondent No. 2 - the Joint Commissioner of Labour, who was holding the charge of the Commissioner of Labour...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskStandard Chartered Bank Ltd. Vs. Grindlays Bank Employees Union and an ...
Mumbai
Feb-11-2003
Service
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1); Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 10
[2003(97)FLR760]; (2003)IILLJ512Bom
C.U. Singh and ;Sunil Dighe, Advs. For Respondent No. 1
D.B. Bhosale, J.1. This petition is directed against the award dated October 29, 2002, passed by the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. II, Mumbai, in Reference bearing no. CGIT- 2/49 of 2001. The dispute...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Abhay Raj JaIn and anr.
Mumbai
Jul-09-2002
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1972 - Sections 28(1)
[2002(94)FLR1036]; 2002(4)MhLj426
C.U. Singh and ;Vinod Shetty, Advs.
R.J. Kochar, J. 1. The petitioner is a multinational company having its establishments all over the country. Its registered office is situated in Mumbai. It has also its manufacturing activities at Mumbai. It is a very...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Kuriakose V. Cherian, Retired Employee of Air India Limited, Vs. A ...
Mumbai
Apr-03-2003
ServiceCivil
Companies Act, 1913; Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 37 and 45; Air India Employees Self Contributory Pension Scheme Rules - Rule 5; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 19, 21, 32, 226 and 300A; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(6), 7(1) and 36(1); Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rules 85, 89, 89(2) and 91; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 15(1); Administrative Act
2003(6)BomCR219
C.U. Singh and ;J.S. Saluja, Advs., i/b., M.V. Kini and Co. for respondent Nos. 1 and 6 to 17, ;S.K. Talsania, Adv., i/b., M.V. Kini, Adv. for respondent No. 2, ;V.Y. Sanglikar, Adv. for respondent No
A.P. Shah, J. 1. This petition under Article 226 is for the issue of appropriate writ, direction or order directing the Respondents to rescind and revoke the amendment effected to the Air India Employees Self Contributory...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTransport and Dock Workers Union and anr. Vs. Chowgule Steamships Ltd. ...
Mumbai
Oct-29-1996
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 9-A; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 31, 51, 54, 55 and 56
1997(4)BomCR33; (1997)3BOMLR387; 1997(1)MhLj574
Mr. C.U. Singh
Dr. B.P. Saraf, J.1. The controversy in this appeal pertains to the true meaning of the expression 'hours of work' appearing in the Fourth Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The facts giving rise to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPress Trust of India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Press Trust of India Employees ...
Mumbai
Aug-16-2002
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1972 - Sections 28, 30(1) and 30(2)
2003(1)BomCR567; (2003)1BOMLR109; [2003(96)FLR565]; (2003)ILLJ709Bom; 2002(4)MhLj653
C.U. Singh and ;D'Souza, Advs., i/b., ;Sanjay Udeshi and Company for respondent No. 1
R.J. Kochar, J.1. Rule. By consent the writ petition is heard forthwith.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by an interim order passed by the Industrial Court in Complaint ULP No. 623 of 2002 filed by the employees...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShramik Sena, a Trade Union of Employees Registered Under Trade Unions ...
Mumbai
Oct-11-2006
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 11, 12, 14, 14(1), 14(2), 14(3) and 61; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Rules, 1975 - Rule 8; Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 28(3) and 28(4)
2007(1)ALLMR29; 2006(6)BomCR502; 2007(1)MhLj588
C.U. Singh, Senior Counsel and ;M. D'Souza, Adv., i/b., Junnerkar and Associates for Respondent No. 1 and ;Sarvasri Sudhir Talsania, Senior Counsel and ;V.P. Vaidya, Adv. for Respondent No. 2
R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Heard. Rule. By consent, rule made returnable forthwith. 2. By the present petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 23-8-2006 passed by the Industrial Court, Thane in Application (MRTU) No. 11 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBombay Gas Public Ltd. and ors. Vs. Bombay Gas Company Employees Union ...
Mumbai
Apr-07-2000
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25O(2) and 25R
2000(3)ALLMR230; [2000(86)FLR162]; (2000)IILLJ509Bom
C.U. Singh and ;S. Gopal, Advs., i/b., Little & Co., ;R.J. Mane, Adv. for Respondent No. 6, ;I.M. Chagla, ;D.J. Khambata and ;N.A. Agarwal, Advs., i/b., W. Ghandy & Co. for Respondent No. 10,
Ranjana Desai, J.1. By this petition, the petitioners have challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 25-O and 25-R of the Maharashtra Act No. 3 of 1982. The petitioners also seek setting aside of the impugned order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Adil K. Patel
Mumbai
Nov-30-2001
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971
(2002)IILLJ383Bom
C.U. Singh, ;Shobha Gopal and ;S.R. Pandey, Advs.
R.M. Lodha, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal was admitted by the Division Bench of this Court on June 22, 1994 by the following order:CORAM : H.H. KANTHARJA and A.P. SHAH, JJ: Appellant Nos. 1 and 2...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »