Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: c u singh and · Page 1 of about 287 results (0.285 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 04 2011

Chairman and M.D. Indian Overseas Bank and ors Vs. Tribhuwan Nath Sriv ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-04-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated September 3, 2003 passed by a division bench of the Allahabad High Court on a writ petition (Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No.6162...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2003

Engineering and Metal Workers Union Vs. Commissioner of Labour and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-24-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25O and 39(2)

Reported in : 2003(2)ALLMR528; 2003(4)BomCR804; (2003)IILLJ598Bom

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Sawant and ;M.D. Naik, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, ;C.U. Singh, ;Mahendra Ghelani and Helanie D'Souza, Advs., i/b., ;Law Charter for Respondent No. 4

D.B. Bhosale, J. 1. The short question that arises for consideration in this writ petition is whether respondent No. 2 - the Joint Commissioner of Labour, who was holding the charge of the Commissioner of Labour...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2003

Standard Chartered Bank Ltd. Vs. Grindlays Bank Employees Union and an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-11-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1); Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 10

Reported in : [2003(97)FLR760]; (2003)IILLJ512Bom

Advocate for Respondent : C.U. Singh and ;Sunil Dighe, Advs. For Respondent No. 1

D.B. Bhosale, J.1. This petition is directed against the award dated October 29, 2002, passed by the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. II, Mumbai, in Reference bearing no. CGIT- 2/49 of 2001. The dispute...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 09 2002

Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Abhay Raj JaIn and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-09-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1972 - Sections 28(1)

Reported in : [2002(94)FLR1036]; 2002(4)MhLj426

Advocate for Respondent : C.U. Singh and ;Vinod Shetty, Advs.

R.J. Kochar, J. 1. The petitioner is a multinational company having its establishments all over the country. Its registered office is situated in Mumbai. It has also its manufacturing activities at Mumbai. It is a very...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2003

Mr. Kuriakose V. Cherian, Retired Employee of Air India Limited, Vs. A ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-03-2003

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Companies Act, 1913; Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 2(11), 37 and 45; Air India Employees Self Contributory Pension Scheme Rules - Rule 5; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 19, 21, 32, 226 and 300A; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(6), 7(1) and 36(1); Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rules 85, 89, 89(2) and 91; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 15(1); Administrative Act

Reported in : 2003(6)BomCR219

Advocate for Respondent : C.U. Singh and ;J.S. Saluja, Advs., i/b., M.V. Kini and Co. for respondent Nos. 1 and 6 to 17, ;S.K. Talsania, Adv., i/b., M.V. Kini, Adv. for respondent No. 2, ;V.Y. Sanglikar, Adv. for respondent No

A.P. Shah, J. 1. This petition under Article 226 is for the issue of appropriate writ, direction or order directing the Respondents to rescind and revoke the amendment effected to the Air India Employees Self Contributory...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 1996

Transport and Dock Workers Union and anr. Vs. Chowgule Steamships Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-29-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 9-A; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 31, 51, 54, 55 and 56

Reported in : 1997(4)BomCR33; (1997)3BOMLR387; 1997(1)MhLj574

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. C.U. Singh

Dr. B.P. Saraf, J.1. The controversy in this appeal pertains to the true meaning of the expression 'hours of work' appearing in the Fourth Schedule to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The facts giving rise to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2002

Press Trust of India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Press Trust of India Employees ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-16-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1972 - Sections 28, 30(1) and 30(2)

Reported in : 2003(1)BomCR567; (2003)1BOMLR109; [2003(96)FLR565]; (2003)ILLJ709Bom; 2002(4)MhLj653

Advocate for Respondent : C.U. Singh and ;D'Souza, Advs., i/b., ;Sanjay Udeshi and Company for respondent No. 1

R.J. Kochar, J.1. Rule. By consent the writ petition is heard forthwith.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by an interim order passed by the Industrial Court in Complaint ULP No. 623 of 2002 filed by the employees...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2006

Shramik Sena, a Trade Union of Employees Registered Under Trade Unions ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-11-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 11, 12, 14, 14(1), 14(2), 14(3) and 61; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Rules, 1975 - Rule 8; Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 28(3) and 28(4)

Reported in : 2007(1)ALLMR29; 2006(6)BomCR502; 2007(1)MhLj588

Advocate for Respondent : C.U. Singh, Senior Counsel and ;M. D'Souza, Adv., i/b., Junnerkar and Associates for Respondent No. 1 and ;Sarvasri Sudhir Talsania, Senior Counsel and ;V.P. Vaidya, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Heard. Rule. By consent, rule made returnable forthwith. 2. By the present petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 23-8-2006 passed by the Industrial Court, Thane in Application (MRTU) No. 11 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 2000

Bombay Gas Public Ltd. and ors. Vs. Bombay Gas Company Employees Union ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-07-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25O(2) and 25R

Reported in : 2000(3)ALLMR230; [2000(86)FLR162]; (2000)IILLJ509Bom

Advocate for Respondent : C.U. Singh and ;S. Gopal, Advs., i/b., Little & Co., ;R.J. Mane, Adv. for Respondent No. 6, ;I.M. Chagla, ;D.J. Khambata and ;N.A. Agarwal, Advs., i/b., W. Ghandy & Co. for Respondent No. 10,

Ranjana Desai, J.1. By this petition, the petitioners have challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 25-O and 25-R of the Maharashtra Act No. 3 of 1982. The petitioners also seek setting aside of the impugned order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2001

Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Adil K. Patel

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-30-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971

Reported in : (2002)IILLJ383Bom

Advocate for Respondent : C.U. Singh, ;Shobha Gopal and ;S.R. Pandey, Advs.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal was admitted by the Division Bench of this Court on June 22, 1994 by the following order:CORAM : H.H. KANTHARJA and A.P. SHAH, JJ: Appellant Nos. 1 and 2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial