Advanced Search Results
Sundaram Finance Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Jan-11-1984
Direct Taxation
(1984)7ITD845(Mad.)
1. The question to be decided in this appeal concerns the interpretation of Section 37(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') read with Rule 6D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. Delhi Bench 'E' of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKanakadhara Industries Vs. Third Income-tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Aug-03-1983
Direct Taxation
(1984)7ITD142(Mad.)
1. The assessee is in appeal against the order dated 4-10-1982 of Shri S.S.N. Moorthy, the AAC, who dismissed the appeal against the order dated 31-7-1981 of Shri K. Rajaram, the ITO.2. The relevant facts in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Bank of Travancore Vs. Wealth-tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Mar-24-1984
Direct Taxation
(1984)8ITD529(Mad.)
1. The point for determination in these cases by a Special Bench is as to whether the assessee, State Bank of Travancore Employees Union, a trade union registered under the Indian Trade Unions Act, 1926, is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
income-tax Officer Vs. Sivam and Co.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Sep-04-1984
Direct Taxation
(1984)10ITD799(Mad.)
1. The revenue has preferred this appeal against the order dated 18-10-1982 of Shri A.B. Menon, the Commissioner (Appeals), who partly, allowed the appeal against the order dated 25-5-1982 of Shri S. Bavi, the ITO.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askincome-tax Officer Vs. Sundaram Spinning Mills
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Dec-04-1984
Direct Taxation
(1985)11ITD596(Mad.)
1. These two appeals by the revenue relating to the same assessee are heard together and disposed of by this common order. The assessee-firm is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of yarn. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited India Insurance Company Ltd Vs. Anju Antony
Kerala
Jul-14-2015
Land Acquisition
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.JYOTHINDRANATH TUESDAY, THE14H DAY OF JULY201523RD ASHADHA, 1937 MACA.No. 578 of 2009 ( ) ------------------------- AGAINST THE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSecretary, Vijayakumar Mills National Workers' Union Vs. the Managemen ...
Chennai
Nov-20-1962
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 10(1)
AIR1963Mad427; [1964(8)FLR151]; (1963)ILLJ510Mad
C.S. Padmanabhan, Adv. for ;King and Patridge
ORDERVeeraswami, J. 1. The petitioner, who was employed by the first respondent as a time-keeper, was dismissed from service on 29th March, 1958, on a finding that a certain charge framed against him was proved. His...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChief Controlling Revenue Authority, Board of Revenue, Madras Vs. Simp ...
Chennai
Jan-28-1969
Civil
Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 3, 9 and 76(2); Madras City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919 - Sections 98 and 135
AIR1970Mad7
C.S. Padmanabhan, Adv. for ;King and Partridge
1. The point involved in this Reference is a short but an interesting one. Under Section 9 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, there is a statutory power in the Government, not merely to reduce the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Madras, Represented by Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Vs. Madu ...
Chennai
Apr-11-1963
Sales TaxConstitution
Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 9 to 12D and 18A; Constitution of India - Article 133
AIR1964Mad494; [1964]15STC207(Mad)
C.S. Padmanabhan, Adv. for ;King and Partridge
Jagadisan, J.1. This is a petition by the State of Madras, for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of India from the judgment of this Court in T. C. No. 162 of 1958. Leave is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Madras Vs. Voltas Limited
Chennai
Jul-12-1963
Sales Tax
[1963]14STC861(Mad)
C.S. Padmanabhan, Adv. for ;King and ;Partridge, Attorneys
Jagadisan, J.1. The State of Madras is the revision petitioner. It questions the correctness of the order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras, holding that the turnover of Rs. 98,518 of the assessees (respondents) is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›