Advanced Search Results

Kashi Ram Vs. Rakesh Arora

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 42, 47 and 151 - Order 21, Rule 22; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 42; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 31 - Schedule - Article 136; Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 182

Reported in : AIR1987SC2230; JT1987(3)SC389; 1987(2)SCALE387; (1987)4SCC84; [1987]3SCR1001

Advocate for Respondent : B.R. Agarwala, Adv.

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 289 of 1982.1003From the Judgment and Order dated 17.7. 1981 of the Delhi High Court in S.A.O. No. 249 of 1981. Soli J. Sorabji, Anil Kumar Gupta and Brij Bhushan...

Amarchand Sobhachand Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2)

Reported in : AIR1971SC720; [1971]82ITR591(SC); (1971)1SCC458; [1971]3SCR415; 1971(III)LC267(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Jagadish Swarup, ; S.T. Desai, ; R.N. Sachthey and ;

ORDERShah, J.15. By our order dated July 29, 1969, we called for a supplementary statement of case on the question reframed in the light of the two branches of section 10(2) (xi) of the Indian Income-tax...

India Pipe Fitting Co. Vs. FakruddIn M.A. Baker and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR1978SC45; (1977)4SCC587; [1978]1SCR797; 1977(9)LC742(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : V.S. Desai, ; P.B. Agarwala and ; B.R. Agarwala, Advs.

P.K. Goswami, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order of the Bombay High Court in an application under Article 227 of the Constitution against the judgment and decree of February...

Cyril E. Fernandes Vs. Sr. Maria Lydia and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : AIR1977SC2145; [1977(35)FLR216]; 1977LabIC1549; (1977)4SCC94; [1978]1SCR388; 1977(9)LC595(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : J.P. Mehta, ; B.R. Agarwala and ; Janendra Lal, ;

A.C. Gupta, J.1. The appellant was employed as a teacher in the Presentation Convent High School, Margao, Goa. The school is recognised by the Department of Education of the Government of the Union Territory of Goa,...

Keshavsinh Dwarkadas Kapadia, Etc. Vs. Indian Engineering Company

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 3 and 8

Reported in : AIR1972SC1538; (1971)2SCC706; [1972]1SCR695; 1972(4)LC70(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : S.V. Gupte and ; B.R. Agarwala, Advs.

A.N. Ray, J.1. These two appeals are by special leave against the judgment dated 17 October, 1968 of the High Court at Bombay determining under Section 33 of the Arbitration Act that the umpire rightly entered...

Hakam Sing Vs. Gammon (India) Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 41; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 20; Contract Act - Sections 28

Reported in : AIR1971SC740; (1971)1SCC286; [1971]3SCR314; 1971(III)LC167(SC); MANU/SC/0001/1971

Advocate for Respondent : B.R. Agarwala and ; V.S. Desai, ; Advs.

J.C. Shah, C.J.1. On October 5, 1960 the appellant agreed to do certain construction work for the respondent on the terms and conditions of a 'written tender'. Clauses 12 & 13 of the tender were:12. In...

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Exen Industries

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1974SC2346; (1975)1SCC6; [1975]2SCR364; 1974(6)LC660(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : G.L. Sanghi,. Praveen Kumar and. B.R. Agarwala, Advs.

A. Alagiriswami, J.1. One H.T. Vora and another G. J. Mehta formed a partnership under the name of Exen Industries and were manufacturing fountain pens. In December 1963 the partnership was dissolved and Vora took in...

Shah Babulal Khimji Vs. Jayaben D. Kania and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 202; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 1, 2, 2(2), 2(9), 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 10, 16, 17, 20, 35A, 37, 47, 80, 91, 92, 95, 96 to 112, 116 to 120, 122, 125, 129, 144, 592 and 622 - Order 7, Rules 10 and 11 - Order 9, Rule 8 - Order 10, Rule 3 - Order 16, Rule 2 - Order 18, Rules 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 16 - Order 20, Rules 1 to 8 - Order 38, Rules 2, 3 and 6 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 2A, 4 and 10 - Order 40, Rules 1 and 4 - Order 41, Rule 10 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 49, Rule 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1877 - Sections 588 to 591, 622; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1882 - Sections 588; Arbitration Act - Sections 39; Government of India Act - Sections 108; Indian High Courts Act, 1961 - Sections 13; Letters Patent Act, 1866; Code of Civil P

Reported in : AIR1981SC1786; 1981(3)SCALE1169; (1981)4SCC8; [1982]1SCR187

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Khambata, ; B.R. Agarwala, ; K.P. Khambata, ;

Fazal Ali, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against an Order dated January 15, 1981 of the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court by which the appeal filed by the appellant against the...

Diwakar Shrivastava and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR1984SC468; 1984(32)BLJR206; [1984(48)FLR339]; 1984(1)SCALE141; 1984Supp(1)SCC214; [1984]2SCR792; 1984(16)LC296(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Sanghi, ; B.R. Agarwala and ; V.K. Chitre, Advs.

O. Chinnappa Reddy, J.1. The appellants in the several appeals before us question the relaxation granted to candidates belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in regard to the minimum qualifying marks for admission...

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. N.K. Private Limited and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 299 and 299(1)

Reported in : AIR1972SC915; (1973)3SCC388; [1972]3SCR437

Advocate for Respondent : V.M. Tarkunde, ; G.L. Sanghi, ; B.R. Agarwala and ;

P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J.1. This appeal is by special leave. The question for consideration is whether there is a binding, valid and concluded contract between the appellants and the respondents. On an application filed by the...