Advanced Search Results

The Competent Authority. Vs. A.Sowkath Ali and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Custom

Acts : Customs Act - Section 108; Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property)(SAFEMA) Act, 1976 - Section 6(1), 12, 5, 15, 12(5), 26(2),; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Section 54; Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property) Rules, 1977 - Rule 7 ; Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.B.Kumar, Adv.

Writ Petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari,to call for the records of the third respondent in his proceedings in FPA No.12/MDS/2009 and FPA...

Mariammal Vs. Govindammal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 9, 74 and 103; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR1985Mad5

Advocate for Respondent : B. Kumar, Adv.

Swamikkannu, J.1. The second plaintiff Mariammal in O. S. No. 108 of 1974. on the file of the Subordinate Judge. 26 Mayuram, is the appellant herein. The suit was filed by one Nagammal for partition and...

A. Michael Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Chennai

Subject : FERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 3, 4(1), 5, 6, 6(4), 6(5), 7, 8(1), 34, 35, 40, 49, 51, 52(3), 52(4), 54, 56, 57, 59, 63, 64(2) and 71; Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Sections 35; Income Tax Act - Sections 253 and 256; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act - Sections 37; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1983 - Sections 138 and 142; Authentication Orders and Other Instruments Rules, 2002; Conditions of Services Rules - Rule 3

Reported in : [2009]96SCL321(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : B. Kumar and ;B. Sathish Sundar, Advs.

Prabha Sridevan, J.1. Heard Mr. B. Kumar, learned senior counsel appearing for the writ petitioners and respondents in the appeals and Mr. K. Ramasamy, learned Special Counsel for the respondents in the writ petitions and appellants...

M.V. Mohammed and ors. Vs. M. Srinivasan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : City Tenants Protection Act - Section 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Sections 200, 482

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B. Kumar; Mr.R. Loganathan, Advs.

ORDER1. By consent of both sides, the matter has been taken up for final hearing. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to call for the proceedings in C.C.No.2731 of 2010 on the file of the...

Dr. Subramanian Swamy Vs. T.T.V. Dinakaran, Member of Parliament,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2004)2MLJ238

Advocate for Respondent : B. Kumar, Sr. Counsel, for ; A. Jinasenan, Adv., For 1st Respondent, ;G. Rajagopalan, Sr. Counsel, For 2nd Respondent and ;J. Madanagopal Rao, S.C.G.S.C. For 3rd Respondent

ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, C. J. 1. This writ petition has been originally filed seeking a writ of quo warranto to declare that the 1st respondent i.e, Mr.T.T.V.Dinakaran as being disqualified to be a member of the...

Palanivel Pillai Vs. Santharam Iyer and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1984)2MLJ109

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B. Kumar

S. Nainar Sundaram, J.1. In this second appeal, the defendant in O.S. No. 290 of 1976 on the file of the District Munsif, Mayuram, is the appellant. The respondents herein are the plaintiffs in the suit....

R. Paulsamy and Gladys Lilly Vs. Superintendent, Narcotics Control Bur ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 374

Reported in : 2003(162)ELT39(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : B. Kumar, Senior Counsel for ;S. Shanmugavelayutham, Adv. in CA 928/00 and ;P.N. Prakash, Special Public Prosecutor in C.A.868/00

1. This judgment shall govern both the criminal appeals, and the parties hereinafter will be referred to as per the cause title in C.A.868 of 2000 namely appellants/A-1 and A-2 and respondent.2. The appellants, who were...

Intelligence Officer Vs. P Balakrishnan @ Krishna @ Balan @ Rajan

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. B. Kumar

1 ® IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF FEBRUARY2017BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.71 OF2009BETWEEN: Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, South Zonal Unit, Chennai. (By...

Uphar Picture Palace Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, 1953 - Sections 26(2)

Reported in : [2002(95)FLR101]

Advocate for Respondent : A.B. Kumar, Adv.

ORDERS.M. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. This application has been preferred by petitioner, M/s. Uphar picture Palace against the order dated 6.8.1999 passed by learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ranchi, in B.S. Case No. 11/97. The application under Section...

V. Manakkan and Five Others Vs. Veera Perumal

Court : Chennai

Subject : propertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 100; Evidence Act, 1872 -- Sections 3, 101 to 104; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 41

Reported in : 1998(2)CTC157; (1998)IIIMLJ577

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.B. Kumar, Adv.

ORDER1. The defendants are the appellants.2. The suit O.S. No.56 of 1980 was filed by the respondent herein against the appellants before the District Munsif, Tirunelveli, for declaration of title and for permanent injunction against them...