Advanced Search Results

M/S Sriram Panel Product Pvt. Ltd vs Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B. K. Sood, Mr. Manik Sood, Ms. Jyotsna Bhardwaj

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16193/2025 and CM APPL. 66267/2025 M/S SRIRAM PANEL PRODUCT PVT. LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kumar Vikramaditya, Advocate.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. B....

Bureau of Indian Standards Emp. Union and ors. Vs. Dir. Gen., Bureau o ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999IIIAD(Delhi)789; 80(1999)DLT35

Advocate for Respondent : Shri B.K. Sood, Adv.

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner No.1 is a Union and petitioner Nos. 2 & 3 are employees of the Bureau of Indian Standards. They have prayed for the following reliefs: 'So, under the above facts and...

Meeenal Passi vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B.K. Sood, Mr. Sandeep Thukral, Ms. Tatini Basu

$~53 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % LPA No.286/2017 and CM Nos.14667-69/2017 Date of decision :19. h April, 2017 MEEENAL PASSI ..... Appellant Through : Mr. K.K. Rai, Sr. Adv. with...

Kishan Chand Bhatia (Thr. Lrs.) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 - Sections 7, 8, 14, 16, 19, 20, 22, 24, 25, 25(2), 33 and 40; Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Rules, 1955 - Rule 102; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 118(2005)DLT694; 2005(81)DRJ591

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-1, 2 and 4 and ; B.K. Sood, ; Sub

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the relief claimed is a direction to set aside the order dated 18.10.1978 passed by the Central Government under Section 33...

Bureau of Indian Standards Employees Union and ors. Vs. Bureau of Indi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 - Sections 38; Bureau of Indian Standards (Terms and Conditions of Service of Employees) Regulation, 1988; Bureau of Indian Standards (Recruitment to Administration, Finance and Other Posts) Regulation, 1988; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14 and 16

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT444

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Sood, ; Vikram Bajaj, ; Meera Bhatia and ;

S.B. Sinha, C.J.(A) FACTS OF THE CASE:- 1. The Indian Standards Institution (hereinafter referred to as the 'ISI') was established on 03.09.1946. By virtue of a Resolution adopted by the Government of India, Bye-Laws were framed...

Virtus Dordrecht B.V. and anr. Vs. Vikram Bhargava and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Deepak Chawla, Mr. Raghav Paul, Mr. B.K. Sood, Mr. Meharjit Singh, Mr. Manik Sood, Mr. Arun Bhatia

$~F-32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h February, 2014 Decided on:7. h July, 2014 + CS(OS) 674/1998 VIRTUS DORDRECHT B.V. & ANR. Through: ..... Plaintiffs Mr. L.K. Singh and...

Sh. Sanjeev Kumar & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B.K. Sood, Mr. Sandeep Thukral

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.5594/2000 + % SH. SANJEEV KUMAR & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 27th March, 2017 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Pardeep Dahiya, Advocate. versus ...........

# Prem Lata Vs. $ Pawan Kumar Khurana and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B.K. Sood, Mr. Vipul Sharda

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % R.C.REV.NO. 184/2010 + Date of Decision: 15th February, 2012 # PREM LATA ....Petitioner ! Through: Mr. Anil Kumar Aggarwal and Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocates Versus...

Shah Jethalal Lalji Vs. Khimji M. Bhujpuria

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1974)76BOMLR270

Joshi, J.1. The petitioner (original complainant) whose complaint has been dismissed, mainly on the ground of want of jurisdiction and being bad in law for misjoinder of charges and persons, by the learned Presidency Magistrate, 22nd...

Niloba Ghanshyam Naik and Another Vs. Lodha Pranik Developers Pvt. Ltd ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : MRTP

J.M. Malik, Presiding Member 1. There is a delay of 207 days in filing the instant complaint. The complaint was filed on 1.4.2014, whereas the cause of action had arisen on 21.12.2010 and at the most...