Advanced Search Results

Popcorn Entertainment Corporation, Through Is Proprietor Shri Nilesh G ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 9, 45, 113(3A), 118, 154 and 159; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005; Society Registration Act; Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950; New Bombay Disposal of Land Regulations, 1975; New Bombay Land Disposal Rules, 1975 - Rule 4; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 141 and 226; New Bombay Disposal of Lands Regulations, 1975 - Regulation 4

Reported in : 2009(6)BomCR52

Advocate for Respondent : G.S. Hegde and ;C.M. Lokesh, Advs., i/b., G.S. Hegde & Associates for Respondent No. 1 and ;P.I. Khemani, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 2

V.C. Daga, J.1. The first and second petitioners 'M/s. Popcorn Entertainment in W.P. No. 9467/2008 ('M/s. Popcorn' for short) and M/s. Platinum Entertainment in W.P. No. 9468/2008 ('M/s. Platinum' for short) were allotted plot of lands...

Praveen Kumar Rai Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Writ Petition No ::2117. / 2013 Praveen Kumar Rai versus State of MP and others 01.05.2013. Shri Wakeel Khan for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Panel Lawyer, for the State. Shri Ashok Sinha for respondent...

Vinay Mohan Lal Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(2)SLJ235CAT

1. This OA has been filed by the applicant for quashing and setting aside impugned order dated 24.5.2005 moving the applicant from the post of Chairman, Third Maharastra Finance Commission (in short 'TMFC') and posting him...

Vibhor Raj and Another Vs. the Convenor, Common Law Admission Test and ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Heard Mr. Ashok Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Yashovardhan, learned counsel for opposite party No.2 as well as Mr. D.K.Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.4. 2. Through the instant writ...

Narendra Kumar Shrivastava Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

1 Writ Petition No. 989/2013 23.1.2013 Shri Ashok Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard. Aggrieved by non­grant of Kramonnati (FiRs. and Second) and non­promotion, petitioner, a Clerk in District Co­ operative Central Bank Ltd., Panna...

Union Od India Vs. M.S. Chandel

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Ashok Sinha

20/07/2012 W.P.No.18483.06(s) Writ Petition No.18483 of 2006(s) ( U n i o n o f I n d i a a n d 3 o t he r s V s . M . S ....

Ram Pratp Singh Yadav Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Ashok Sinha

1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR W.P. No.4501/2003 RAM PRATAP SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Present: Hon’ble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon. Shri Atul Choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri...

Smt. Dulari Bai Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Ashok Sinha

1 W.P. No. 7393/2006 (S) 4.9.2012 Shri H.S. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ashok Sinha, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Heard. Order dated 31.8.2005 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench,...

Pradeep Kashiv Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Ashok Sinha

M.C.C.No ::423. / 2013 Pradeep Kashiv versus Union of India and others 31.07.2013. Shri Vaibhav Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ashok Sinha, counsel for the respondents. This application has been filed for restoration of Writ...

Suresh Kumar Vs. Purshottam Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justice R ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Rajeev Barkar

W.P.No.7326/2013 Suresh Kumar Tiwari versus Purshottam Tiwari & ORS.28/01/2014 Shri Ashok Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rajeev Barkar, learned counsel for the respondents. Challenging the order Annexure-P1 dated 12.3.2013 passed by the learned Additional...