Skip to content


Pradeep Kashiv Vs. Union of India - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtMadhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
AppellantPradeep Kashiv
RespondentUnion of India
Excerpt:
.....before appropriate bench. accordingly, the application stands allowed and disposed of. certified copy as per rules. ( rajendra meno.) ( smt. vimla jain ) judge judge aks/-
Judgment:

M.C.C.No ::

423. / 2013 Pradeep Kashiv versus Union of India and others 31.07.2013.

Shri Vaibhav Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Ashok Sinha, counsel for the respondents.

This application has been filed for restoration of Writ Petition (S) No.2516/2005, which has been dismissed for want of prosecution on 22.2.2013.

Default on the part of the counsel for non-appearance is explained by pointing out that the counsel had met with some accident and due to his personal difficulties, he could not appear.

The application is supported by affidavit of the counsel himself and we see no reason to dis-believe the same.

In view of the above, this application is allowed.

Writ Petition (S) No.2516/2005 is restored to its original file.

It be placed for orders before Appropriate Bench.

Accordingly, the application stands allowed and disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.

( RAJENDRA MENo.) ( SMT.

VIMLA JAIN ) JUDGE JUDGE Aks/-


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //