Advanced Search Results

Smt. Sushil Kumari, W/O Shri Rajesh Sharma and Smt. Madhu Verma, W/O D ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi School Education Rules - Rule 98(2), 98(3) and 98(4)

Reported in : 2003IVAD(Delhi)389; 104(2003)DLT949; 2003(71)DRJ464; 2003(3)SLJ503(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Chhabra, Adv. for R2 and ; K.K. Rai, Adv. for R3 and R4

Vijender Jain, J. 1. Rule.2. This petition, inter alia, seeks issuance of appropriate writ or direction for appointment of the petitioners to the post of Assistant Teachers and quashing the communication dated 19th June, 2001 of...

Ms. Bindu Khanna Vs. Managing Committee and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Ferida Satarwala, Mr. Ashok Chhabra

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W. P. (C) 1366/2011 19th July, 2013 % MS. BINDU KHANNA Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Madhumita Bhattcharjee, Advocate. Versus MANAGING COMMITTEE AND ORS. ..... Respondents...

Rajiv Kumar Damani Vs. M.M.T.C. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ashok Chhabra

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h December, 2013 % + RFA No.674/2002 RAJIV KUMAR DAMANI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Praban K. Sharma, Adv. Versus M.M.T.C. LTD. Through: ..... Respondent...

Suresh Kumar Malhotra & Ors. Vs.gujral Estates Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ashok Chhabra

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.2677/1986 + % SURESH KUMAR MALHOTRA & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs 10th January, 2018 Through: Plaintiff no.1 in person. versus GUJRAL ESTATES PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant...

Ajay Malhotra vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Varun Kumar Tikmani, Mr. Ashok Chhabra, Ms. Ankita Gandhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5th April 2019 Pronounced on:15. h May 2019 + TEST.CAS. 37/2018 & I.As No.12478/2018, 13118/2018 AJAY MALHOTRA ........ Petitioner STATE Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja and...

Mrs. Neelam Kapur vs.the Manageing Committee Queen Mary’s School &am ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ashok Chhabra, Mr. Nikhil, Mr. Satyakaam, Mr. Naveen Jakkar

* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.2579/2014 9th January, 2017 MRS. NEELAM KAPUR Ms. Minal Sehgal, Advocate. ........ Petitioner Through: versus THE MANAGEING COMMITTEE QUEEN MARY’S SCHOOL & ORS....

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kashmiri Lal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 168, 168(3), 173(1) and 174; Constitution of India - Article 227 and 227(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : IV(2005)ACC817; 2007ACJ688; AIR2006Delhi112; 125(2005)DLT571; 2006(86)DRJ99

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Chhabra, Adv. as amices Curiae

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India arose from an execution of an award in favor of the claimant in a motor accident case and discloses a tortuous route...

u.p. Hotels Ltd vs.meenakshi Verma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ashok Chhabra, Mr. Nikhil Karwal

$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 18, 2016 FAO2432012 & C.Ms.10316/12, 131U.P. HOTELS LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amitabh Chaturvedi and Mr. Sumit Kumar Shukla, Advocates...

Ashish Kumar Jain vs Ms Dr Johns Lab Healthcare Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ashok Chhabra, Mr. Kunal Jaggi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 06th April, 2026 Pronounced on: 29thMay, 2026 + RFA 689/2023, CM APPL.44289/2023&44352/2023 ASHISH KUMAR JAIN S/O Shri Labh Chand Jain, Proprietor of M/S Tanishq...

Procter and Gamble Company Vs. Satish Patel and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 4; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 12(3)

Reported in : 1997(1)ARBLR158(Delhi); 64(1996)DLT646

K. Ramamoorthy, J. (1) The first plaintiff, the Procter & Gamble Company and the second plaintiff Procter & Gamble Godrej Limited have filed the suit for injunction on the ground that the defendants are passing off...