Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: ajay pal · Page 1 of about 449 results (0.130 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 12 2010

The State of Punjab Vs. Manjit Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-12-2010

Subject : Criminal

Hemant Gupta, J.1. This order shall dispose of Murder Reference No. 3 of 2008, Criminal Appeal Nos. 7-DB of 2008 and 25-DB of 2008 arising out of judgment of conviction dated 11.12.2007 vide which Manjit Singh...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 1998

Tam Tam Pedda Guruva Reddy Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-26-1998

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 - Rules 8-B, 9, 11, 31-A and 36 to 41; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 62, 64 and 115; Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 56

Reported in : ILR1998KAR3331; 1998(6)KarLJ99

Advocate for Respondent : Sri Kantharaj and ;Sri M.B. Prabhakar, High Court Government Pleader

ORDER1. The allegations contained in these writ petitions in brief are as follows:The 2nd respondent issued Annexure-A notification under Rule 31-A of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994, hereinafter referred to as the Rules, notifying...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 2008

Dilbagh Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-27-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 5 and 19; Arms Act - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 148, 149, 302, 307 and 382; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2008(8)SCALE262; 2008AIRSCW3803; 2008(4)Supreme34

Advocate for Respondent : Ajay Pal, Adv.

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. The appellant has filed this appeal under Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 against the final judgment and order dated 26.02.2007 passed by the Additional Judge, Designated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 28 2007

The State of Jharkhand Vs. Ajay Kumar Pal

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-28-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 201, 302, 326 and 436; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 366

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR613

Advocate for Respondent : Rajesh Kumar,; Amrita Sarkar,; Deepak Kumar Bharati

D.P. Singh, J.1. The convict Ajay Kumar Pal has been sentenced to be hanged till death for causing death of five persons under Section 302 IPC by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2009

Food Corporation of India Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-21-2009

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 11(2), 22(1) and 22(2)

Reported in : 2009(241)ELT5(SC); JT2009(12)SC437; 2009(11)SCALE569; (2009)9SCC188; (2009)12VatReporter89; (2009)24VST598(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Ajay Pal, Adv.

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by Food Corporation of India (in short 'FCI') is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh dated 08.02.2007 in G.S.T.R....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2008

Lajpat Rai Mehta Vs. Secretary to Government of Punjab, Department of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-16-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 47; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 142

Reported in : (2009)IILLJ331SC; 2009(1)SCALE76; (2009)3SCC260

Advocate for Respondent : Ajay Pal, Adv.

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 31.7.2007 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Civil Revision Petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2007

State of Madhya Pradesh and ors. Vs. Dr. (Smt.) Neelima Singh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-12-2007

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2007(3)MPHT570; 2008(1)MPLJ342

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Rajendra Shrivastava

ORDERA.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. This is an appeal under Section 2 of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 against the order dated 1-8-2006 of learned Single Judge passed in W.P. No. 3326...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 02 2011

Ajay Pal and anr. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-02-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 34; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (CRPC) - Section 313

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Manoj Ohri, Adv.

1. Briefly, the prosecution case is that on 26th March, 2005, the day of Holi, an information was received at Police Station Mayur Vihar vide DD No.29B Ex.PW 7/A at about 3:40 PM from someone that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1991

The Govt. of A.P. Rep. by Its Principal Secretary, Irrigation and C.A. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-01-1991

Subject : CivilArbitration

Acts : Costitution of India - Articles 32, 226 and 229; Writ Proceedings Rules - Rule 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 141 Order 3, Rule 4 and Order 23, Rule 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : 1991(2)ALT378

Advocate for Respondent : Soli Sorabji, Adv. ;for M.R.K. Chowdary, Adv.

P. Venkatarama Reddy, J. 1. An apparently innocuous order passed in a writ petition directing reference of the dispute to arbitration based upon the consent of the Counsel has given rise to these Writ Appeals. 2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 2001

Phullibai Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-16-2001

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32(1); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT445; 2002(1)MPLJ301

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Verma, Panel Lawyer

1. Sole appellant, being aggrieved by her conviction for offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentence of rigorous imprisonment for life passed by Ist Addl. Sessions Judge, Sidhi in Sessions Trial No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial